Attack Relations among Dynamic Coalitions

Belgian/Netherlands Artificial Intelligence Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 25-32

  Boella, Guido ^a   van der Torre, Leendert ^b   Villata, Serena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; COALITION FORMATIONS; DYNAMIC COALITIONS; DYNAMIC EXTENSION; FORMAL ARGUMENTATION; TASK-BASED;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 71149086316     PISSN: 15687805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. L. Amgoud, An Argumentation-Based Model for Reasoning About Coalition Structures, Proceedings of ArgMAS'05, pp. 217-228, (2005).
2. P. Baroni andM. Giacomin, On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15): 675-700, (2007).
3. H. Barringer, D. M. Gabbay and J. Woods, Temporal Dynamics of Support and Attack Networks: From Argumentation to Zoology. Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning, pp. 59-98, (2005).
4. T. J.M. Bench-Capon and P. E. Dunne, Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15): 619-641, (2007).
5. G. Boella, L. Sauro and L. van der Torre, Strengthening Admissible Coalitions, Proceedings of ECAI'06, (2006).
6. P. Bresciani, A. Perini, P. Giorgini, F. Giunchiglia and J. Mylopoulos, Tropos: An Agent-Oriented Software DevelopmentMethodology, Autonomous Agents andMulti-Agent Systems Journal, 8, pp. 203- 236, (2004).
7. G. Brewka, Reasoning about Priorities in Default Logic, Proceedings of AAAI, pp. 940-945, (1994).
8. N. Bulling, C. I. Chesnevar and J. Dix, Modelling Coalitions: ATL + Argumentation, Proceedings of AAMAS'08, pp. 681-688, (2008).
9. P. Caire, S. Villata, L. van der Torre and G. Boella, ConvivialityMasks inMultiagent Systems, Proceedings of AAMAS'08, pp. 1265-1268, (2008).
10. C. Castelfranchi, The micro-macro constitution of power, Protosociology, 18, pp. 208-269, (2003).
11. P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artif. Intell., 77(2), pp. 321-357, (1995).
12. S. Kaci, L. van der Torre and E. Weydert, On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments. Proceedings of ECSQARU'07, pp. 247-258, (2007).
13. S. Modgil, An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences. Proceedings of ECSQARU'07, pp. 648-659, (2007).
14. H. Prakken and G. Sartor, Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 7(1), (1997).
15. O. Shehory and S. Kraus, Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation, Artif. Intell., 101, pp. 165-200, (1998).
16. J. S. Sichman, DEPINT: Dependence-Based Coalition Formation in an Open Multi-Agent Scenario, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation,1(2), (1998).
17. J. S. Sichman and R. Conte, Multi-agent dependence by dependence graphs, Proceedings of AAMAS' 02, pp. 483-490, (2002).