An abstract theory of argumentation that accommodates defeasible reasoning about preferences

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4724 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 648-659

  Modgil, Sanjay ^a  

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LOGIC PROGRAMMING; SEMANTICS;

ARGUMENTATION; DEFEASIBLE PRIORITIES; DEFEASIBLE REASONING; LOGIC BASED SYSTEMS;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 38049138858     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_57     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Amgoud, L.: Using Preferences to Select Acceptable Arguments. In: Proc. 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 43-44 (1998)
2. Amgoud, L., Parsons, S.: Agent Dialogues with Conflicting Preferences. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 190-205. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
3. Atkinson, K.M., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., McBurney, P.: Computational Representation of Practical Argument. Synthese 152(2), 157-206 (2006)
4. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429-448 (2003)
5. Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 93, 63-101 (1997)
6. Brewka, G.: Reasoning about priorities in default logic. In: Proc. 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAT/94), pp. 940-945 (1994)
7. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321-357 (1995)
8. Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proc. Second international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 883-890 (2003)
9. Modgil, S.: Hierarchical Argumentation. In: Proc. 10th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 319-332 (2006)
10. Modgil, S.: Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks. In: Proc. 1 st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pp. 297-308 (2006)
11. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7, 25-75 (1997)