Parallel divergence in mate guarding behaviour following colonization of a novel habitat

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2540-2549

  Karlsson, K ^a   Eroukhmanoff, F ^a   Hardling R ^a   Svensson, E I ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Asellus aquaticus; Mating behaviour; Parallel evolution; Precopulatory mate guarding; Predation; Rapid divergence; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; COLONIZATION; DIVERGENCE; ECOTYPE; FITNESS; HABITAT TYPE; ISOPOD; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; MATE GUARDING; PARALLEL EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PREDATION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; ISOPODA; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SWEDEN; TIME;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; ISOPODA; MALE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS;

SWEDEN;

ASELLUS AQUATICUS;

EID: 78449236773     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02102.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Benesh, D.P., Valtonen, E.T. & Jormalainen, V. 2007. Reduced survival associated with precopulatory mate guarding in male Asellus aquaticus (isopoda). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 44: 425-434.
3. Bonduriansky, R. & Chenoweth, S.F. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 280-288.
4. Boughman, J.W., Rundle, H.D. & Schluter, D. 2005. Parallel evolution of sexual isolation in sticklebacks. Evolution 59: 361-373.
5. Candolin, U., Salesto, T. & Evers, M. 2007. Changed environmental conditions weaken sexual selection in sticklebacks. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 233-239.
6. Cothran, R.D. 2004. Precopulatory mate guarding affects predation risk in two freshwater amphipod species. Anim. Behav. 68: 1133-1138.
7. Davies, N.B. & Lundberg, A. 1984. Food distribution and a variable mating system in the Dunnock Prunella-Modularis. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 895-912.
8. Davies, N., Hartley, I., Hatchwell, B., Desrochers, A., Skeer, J. & Nebel, D. 1995. The polygynandrous mating system of the alpine accentor, Prunella collaris: I. Ecological causes and reproductive conflicts. Anim. Behav. 49: 769-788.
9. Edward, D.A. & Gilburn, A.S. 2007. The effect of habitat composition on sexual conflict in the seaweed flies Coelopa frigida and C-pilipes. Anim. Behav. 74: 343-348.
10. Emlen, S.T. & Oring, L.W. 1977. Ecology sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215-223.
11. Endler, J.A. & Houde, A.E. 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49: 456-468.
12. Eroukhmanoff, F. 2009. The interplay between selection and constraints on adaptive divergence and phenotypic evolution. PhD-thesis, Lund University.
13. Eroukhmanoff, F. & Svensson, E.I. 2009. Contemporary parallel diversification, antipredator adaptations and phenotypic integration in an aquatic isopod. PLoS ONE 4: e6173.
14. Eroukhmanoff, F., Hargeby, A., Nowshiravani, N., Hellgren, O., Bensch, S. & Svensson, E.I. 2009a. Parallelism and historical contingency in ecotype divergence of a freshwater isopod. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 1098-1110.
15. ST analysis. Mol. Ecol. 18: 4912-4923.
16. Forsgren, E. 1992. Predation risk affects mate choice in a Gobiid fish. Am. Nat. 140: 1041-1049.
17. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
18. Hargeby, A. & Erlandsson, J. 2006. Is size-assortative mating important for rapid pigment differentiation in a freshwater isopod? J. Evol. Biol. 19: 1911-1919.
19. Hargeby, A., Johansson, J. & Ahnesj, J.Ö. 2004. Habitat-specific pigmentation in a freshwater isopod: adaptive evolution over a small spatiotemporal scale. Evolution 58: 81-94.
20. Hargeby, A., Stoltz, J. & Johansson, J. 2005. Locally differentiated cryptic pigmentation in the freshwater isopod Asellus aquaticus. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 713-721.
21. Hargeby, A., Blindow, I. & Andersson, G. 2007. Long-term patterns of shifts between clear and turbid states in Lake Krankesjön and Lake Tåkern. Ecosystems 10: 28-35.
22. Jarvenpaa, M. & Lindstrom, K. 2004. Water turbidity by algal blooms causes mating system breakdown in a shallow-water fish, the sand goby Pomatoschistus minutus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 2361-2365.
23. Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283-327.
24. Jormalainen, V. 1998. Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Q. Rev. Biol. 73: 275-304.
25. Jormalainen, V. & Merilaita, S. 1993. Female resistance and precopulatory guarding in the isopod Idotea baltica (Pallas). Behaviour 125: 219-231.
26. Jormalainen, V. & Merilaita, S. 1995. Female resistance and duration of mate-guarding in three aquatic peracarids (Crustacea). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 43-48.
27. Jormalainen, V. & Shuster, S.M. 1999. Female reproductive cycle and sexual conflict over precopulatory mate-guarding in Thermosphaeroma (Crustacea, Isopoda). Ethology 105: 233-246.
28. Jormalainen, V., Tuomi, J. & Merilaita, S. 1992. Mate choice for male and female size in aquatic isopod Idotea balthica. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29: 161-167.
29. Jormalainen, V., Merilaita, S. & Tuomi, J. 1994a. Male choice and male-male competition in Idotea baltica (Crustacea, Isopoda). Ethology 96: 46-57.
30. Jormalainen, V., Tuomi, J. & Yamamura, N. 1994b. Intersexual conflict over precopula duration in mate guarding Crustacea. Behav. Processes 32: 265-284.
31. Jormalainen, V., Merilaita, S. & Härdling, R. 2000. Dynamics of intersexual conflict over precopulatory mate guarding in two populations of the isopod Idotea baltica. Anim. Behav. 60: 85-93.
32. Jormalainen, V., Merilaita, S. & Riihimaki, J. 2001. Costs of intersexual conflict in the isopod Idotea baltica. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 763-772.
33. Karlsson, K., Eroukhmanoff, F. & Svensson, E.I. 2010. Phenotypic plasticity in response to the social environment: effects of density and sex ratio on mating behaviour following ecotype divergence. PLoS ONE, in press.
34. Langerhans, R. & DeWitt, T.J. 2004. Shared and unique features of evolutionary diversification. Am. Nat. 164: 335-349.
35. Langerhans, R., Knouft, J.H. & Losos, J.B. 2006. Shared and unique features of diversification in greater Antillean Anolis ecomorphs. Evolution 60: 362-369.
36. Lankinen, Å. & Kiboi, S. 2007. Pollen donor identity affects timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): a sexual conflict during pollen competition? Am. Nat. 170: 854-863.
37. Madjidian, J.A. & Lankinen, Å. 2009. Sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution in an annual plant. PLoS ONE 4: e5477.
38. Magellan, K. & Magurran, A.E. 2006. Habitat use mediates the conflict of interest between the sexes. Anim. Behav. 72: 75-81.
39. Magurran, A.E. & Seghers, B.H. 1994. Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255: 31-36.
40. Manning, J.T. 1975. Male discrimination and investment in Asellus-Aquaticus and Asellus-Meridianus Crustacea Isopoda. Behaviour 55: 1-14.
41. Økland, K.A. 1978. Life history and growth of Asellus-Aquaticus in relation to environment in a Eutrophic Lake in Norway. Hydrobiologia 59: 243-260.
42. Orteiza, N., Linder, J. & Rice, W. 2005. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1315-1323.
43. Parker, G.A. 1974. Courtship persistence and female guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48: 157-184.
44. Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M.S. Blum & N.A. Blum, eds), Academic Press, London.
45. Ridley, M. & Thompson, D.J. 1979. Size and mating in Asellus-Aquaticus Crustacea Isopoda. Z. Tierpsychol. 51: 380-397.
46. Rowe, L., Arnqvist, G., Sih, A. & Krupa, J.J. 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 289-293.
47. Sakurai, G. & Kasuya, E. 2008. The costs of harassment in the adzuki bean beetle. Anim. Behav. 75: 1367-1373.
48. Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42: 849-861.
49. Seehausen, O., Van Alphen, J.J.M. & Witte, F. 1997. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277: 1808-1811.
50. Siva-Jothy, M. 2006. Trauma, disease and collateral damage: conflict in cimicids. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361: 269-275.
51. Statsoft, Inc. 2004. statistica (Data Analysis Software System) Vers. 7. Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA.
52. Svensson, E.I., Karlsson, K., Friberg, M. & Eroukhmanoff, F. 2007. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation. Curr. Biol. 17: 1943-1947.
53. Unwin, E.E. 1920. Notes upon the reproduction of Asellus aquaticus. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. 34: 335-343.
54. Verovnik, R., Sket, B. & Trontelj, P. 2005. The colonization of Europe by the freshwater crustacean Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea Isopoda) proceeded from ancient refugia and was directed by habitat connectivity. Mol. Ecol. 14: 4355-4369.
55. Wagner, B.M. & Hansson, L.A. 1998. Food competition and niche separation between fish and the Red-necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena (Boddaert, 1783). Hydrobiologia 368: 75-81.
56. Wellborn, G.A. 1994. Size-biased predation and prey life histories: a comparative study of freshwater amphipod populations. Ecology (Tempe) 75: 2104-2117.
57. Wellborn, G.A., Skelly, D.K. & Werner, E.E. 1996. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 337-363.
58. Yamamura, N. & Jormalainen, V. 1996. Compromised strategy resolves intersexual conflict over precopulatory guarding duration. Evol. Ecol. 10: 661-680.