Influences of source-item contingency and schematic knowledge on source monitoring: Tests of the probability-matching account

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-17

  Bayen, Ute J ^a   Kuhlmann, Beatrice G ^b  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Human judgment; Human memory; Multinomial model; Schemas; Source monitoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 78349306796     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alba J.W., Hasher L. Is memory schematic?. Psychological Bulletin 1983, 93:203-231.
2. Batchelder W.H., Batchelder E. Meta-cognitive guessing strategies in source monitoring. Handbook of metamemory and memory 2008, 211-244. Psychology Press, New York, NY. J. Dunlosky, R.A. Bjork (Eds.).
3. Batchelder W.H., Riefer D.M. Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review 1990, 97:548-564.
4. Batchelder W.H., Riefer D.M. Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6:57-86.
5. Bayen U.J., Murnane K., Erdfelder E. Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:197-215.
6. Bayen U.J., Nakamura G.V., Dupuis S.E., Yang C.-L. The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:480-500.
7. Bransford J.D., Johnson M.K. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1972, 11:717-726.
8. Brewer W.F., Treyens J.C. Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology 1981, 13:207-230.
9. Bröder A., Noethen D., Schütz J., Bay P. Utilization of covariation knowledge in source monitoring: No evidence for implicit processes. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 2007, 71:524-538.
10. Buchner A., Erdfelder E., Vaterrodt-Plünnecke B. Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:137-160.
11. Bullock D.H., Bitterman M.E. Probability-matching in the pigeon. The American Journal of Psychology 1962, 75:634-639.
12. Cook G.I., Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L. Halo and devil effects demonstrate valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal 2003, 12:257-278.
13. Devine P.G. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 56:5-18.
14. Dodson C.S., Darragh J., Williams A. Stereotypes and retrieval-provoked illusory source recollections. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:460-477.
15. Ehrenberg K., Klauer K.C. Flexible use of source information: Processing components of the inconsistency effect in person memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005, 41:369-387.
16. Estes W.K., Straughan J.H. Analysis of a verbal conditioning situation in terms of statistical learning theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1954, 47:225-234.
17. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 1995, 102:684-704.
18. Graesser A.C., Nakamura G.V. The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. The psychology of learning and motivation 1982, Vol. 16:59-109. Academic Press, New York.
19. Greene R.L. Mirror effect in order and associative information: Role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:687-695.
20. Hamilton D.L., Gifford R.K. Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1976, 12:392-407.
21. Healy A.F., Kubovy M. The effects of payoffs and prior probabilities on indices of performance and cutoff location in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 1978, 6:544-553.
22. Hendrickx H., DeHouwer J., Baeyens F., Eelen P., VanAvermaet E. Hidden covariation detection might be very hidden indeed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:201-220.
23. Hicks J.L., Cockman D.W. The effect of general knowledge on source memory and decision processes. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:489-501.
24. Hu X., Batchelder W.H. The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika 1994, 59:21-47.
25. Johnson M.K., Hashtroudi S., Lindsay D.S. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114:3-28.
26. Klauer K.C., Ehrenberg K. Social categorization and fit detection under cognitive load: Efficient or effortful?. European Journal of Social Psychology 2005, 35:493-516.
27. Klauer K.C., Meiser T. A source-monitoring analysis of illusory correlations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:1074-1093.
28. Klauer K.C., Wegener I. Unraveling social categorization in the "Who said what?" paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:1155-1178.
29. Kunda Z., Oleson K.C. Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 68:565-579.
30. Marsh R.L., Cook G.I., Hicks J.L. Gender and orientation stereotypes bias source-monitoring attributions. Memory 2006, 14:148-160.
31. Mather M., Johnson M.K., De Leonardis D.M. Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1999, 16:437-458.
32. Meiser T. Effects of processing strategy on episodic memory and contingency learning in group stereotype formation. Social Cognition 2003, 21:121-156.
33. Meiser T. Contingency learning and biased group impressions. Information sampling and adaptive cognition 2006, 183-209. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. P. Juslin, K. Fielder (Eds.).
34. Meiser T., Bröder A. Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:116-137.
35. Meiser T., Sattler C., von Hecker U. Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: The role of perceived differences in item recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:1015-1040.
36. Murnane K., Bayen U.J. An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition 1996, 24:417-428.
37. Niv Y., Joel D., Meilijson I., Ruppin E. Evolution of reinforcement learning in uncertain environments: A simple explanation for complex foraging behaviors. Adaptive Behavior 2002, 10:5-24.
38. Ratcliff R., Sheu C.F., Gronlund S.D. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review 1992, 99:518-535.
39. Reber A.S. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118:219-235.
40. Richards Z., Hewstone M. Subtyping and subgrouping: Processes for the prevention and promotion of stereotype change. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2001, 5:52-73.
41. Riefer D.M., Hu X., Batchelder W.H. Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:680-693.
42. Rubinstein I. Some factors in probability matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1959, 57:413-416.
43. Siegel S. Theoretical models of choice and strategy behavior: Stable state behavior in the two-choice uncertain outcome situation. Psychometrika 1959, 24:303-316.
44. Sherman J.W., Bessenoff G.R. Stereotypes as source-monitoring cues: On the interaction between episodic and semantic memory. Psychological Science 1999, 10:106-110.
45. Spaniol J., Bayen U.J. When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:631-651.
46. Stahl C., Klauer K.C. HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:267-273.
47. Van Zandt T. ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:582-600.
48. Wegener, I. (2000). Soziale Kategorien im situativen Kontext: Kognitive Flexibilität bei der Personenwahrnehmung [Social categories in a situative context: Cognitive flexibility in person perception]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bonn, Germany: University of Bonn.