Effects of processing strategy on episodic memory and contingency learning in group stereotype formation

Social Cognition

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 121-156

  Meiser, Thorsten ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242678273     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.21.2.121.21318     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
2. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
3. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
4. Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. V., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C.-L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 480-500.
5. Bless, H., Hamilton, D. L., & Mackie, D. M. (1992). Mood effects on the organization of person information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 497-509.
6. Carlston, D. E., & Skowronski, J. J. (1986). Trait memory and behavior memory: The effects of alternative pathways on impression judgment response times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 5-13.
7. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 464-478.
8. Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275-277.
9. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
10. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11.
11. Fiedler, K. (1991). The tricky nature of skewed frequency tables: An information loss account of distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 24-36.
12. Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659-676.
13. Fiedler, K., Walther, E., Freytag, P., & Stryczek, E. (2002). Playing mating games in foreign cultures: A conceptual framework and an experimental paradigm for inductive trivariate inference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 14-30.
14. Garcia-Marques, L., & Hamilton, D. L. (1996). Resolving the apparent discrepancy between the incongruency effect and the expectancy-based illusory correlation effect: The TRAP model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 845-860.
15. Garcia-Marques, L., Hamilton, D. L., & Maddox, K. B. (2002). Exhaustive and heuristic retrieval processes in person cognition: Further tests of the TRAP model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 193-207.
16. Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of Stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392-407.
17. Hamilton, D. L., Katz, L. B., & Leirer, V. O. (1980). Cognitive representation of personality impressions: Organizational processes in first impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1050-1063.
18. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
19. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
20. Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (1989). Notes on the distinction between memory-based versus on-line judgments. In J. N. Bassili (Ed.), On-line cognition in person perception (pp. 1-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
22. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
23. Klauer, K. C., & Meiser, T. (2000). A source-monitoring analysis of illusory correlations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1074-1093.
24. Klauer, K. C., Wegener, L., & Ehrenberg, K. (2002). Perceiving minority members as individuals: The effects of relative group size in social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 223-245.
25. Lichtenstein, M., & Srull, T. K. (1987). Processing objectives as & determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 93-118.
26. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Pacific Groove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
27. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457.
28. McConnell, A. R. (2001). Implicit theories: Consequences for social judgments of individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 215-227.
29. McConnell, A. R., Leibold, J. M., & Sherman, S. J. (1997). Within-target illusory correlations and the formation of context-dependent attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 675-686.
30. McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). On-line and memory-based aspects of individual and group target judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 173-185.
31. McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Target entitativity: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 750-762.
32. Meiser, T., & Bröder, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137.
33. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Crossed categorization effects on the formation of illusory correlations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 443-466.
34. Mullen, B., & Johnson, C. (1990). Distinctiveness-based illusory correlations and stereotyping: A meta-analytic integration. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 11-28.
35. O'Reilly, R., & Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108, 311-345.
36. Pryor, J. B. (1986). The influence of different encoding sets upon the formation of illusory correlations and group impressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 216-226.
37. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Shavitt, S., & Sherman, S. J. (1991). The role of personal relevance in the formation of distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 124-132.
38. Schaller, M. (1992). In-group favoritism and statistical reasoning in social inference: Implications for formation and maintenance of group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 61-74.
39. Schaller, M. (1994). The role of statistical reasoning in the formation, preservation and prevention of group stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 47-61.
40. Schaller, M., & O'Brien, M. (1992). "Intuitive analysis of covariance" and group stereotype formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 776-785.
41. Sherman, J. W., & Frost, L. A. (2000). On the encoding of stereotype-relevant information under cognitive load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 26-34.
42. Sherman, J. W., Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Attention and stereotyping: Cognitive constraints on the construction of meaningful social impressions. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 145-175). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
43. Sherman, J. W., Stroessner, S. J., Loftus, S. T., & Deguzman, G. (1997). Stereotype suppression and recognition memory for stereotypical and nonstereotypical information. Social Cognition, 15, 205-215.
44. Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 23, 238-241.
45. Srull, T. K. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 440-463.
46. Srull, T. K. (1983). Organizational and retrieval processes in person memory: An examination of processing objectives, presentation format, and the possible role of self-generated retrieval cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1157-1170.
47. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.
48. Susskind, J., Maurer, K., Thakkar, V., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 181-191.
49. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, A., & Dijksterhuis, A. (1997). Processing goal as moderator of in-group-serving illusory correlations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 427-441.