Metacognitive guessing strategies in source monitoring

Handbook of Metamemory and Memory

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 211-244

  Batchelder, William H ^a   Batchelder, Ece ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064099367     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203805503     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, R. E. (1984). Did I do it or did I only imagine doing it? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 594-613.
3. Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Vol. 1. Learning, memory, thinking (pp. 243-293). San Francisco: Freeman.
4. Banks, W. P. (2000). Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes. Psychological Science, 11, 267-273.
5. Batchelder, E., & Batchelder, W. H. (2005). Multinomial models for social information processing. Paper presented at Cognitive Psychometrics: Cognitive Models as Measurement Tools, January 2005, University of California, Irvine (prepublication paper available on request).
6. Batchelder, W. H. (1998). Multinomial processing tree models and psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 10, 331-344.
7. Batchelder, W. H. (2002). Discrete state models of information processing. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, (Vol. 6, pp. 3746-3751). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
8. Batchelder, W. H., Hu, X., & Riefer, D. M. (1994). Analysis of a model for source monitoring. In G. H. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology (pp. 51-65). New York: Springer.
9. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
10. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
11. Batchelder, W. H., and Riefer, D. M. (2007). Using multinomial processing tree models to measure cognitive deficits in clinical populations. In R. Neufeld (Ed.). Advances in clinical cognitive science: Formal modeling of processes and symptoms (pp. 19-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
12. Batchelder, W. H., Riefer, D. M., & Hu, X. (1994). Measuring memory factors in source monitoring. Psychological Review, 101, 172-176.
13. Bayen, U. J., Murname, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 22, 197-215.
14. Benjamin, A. S. (2003). Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 297-305.
15. Benjamin, A. S., & Bawa, S. (2004). Distractor plausibility and criterion placement in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 159-172.
16. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Hirshman, E. (1998). Predicting the future and reconstructing the past: A Bayesian characterization of the utility of subjective fluency. Acta Psychologica, 98, 267-290.
17. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metacognitive index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 1-14.
18. Bray, N. W., & Batchelder, W. H. (1972). Effects of instructions and retention interval on memory of presentation mode. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 367-374.
19. Brown, S. D., Steyvers, M., & Hemmer, P. (2007). Modeling experimentally induced strategy shifts. Psychological Science, 18, 40-45.
20. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plunnecke, B. (1995). Unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
21. Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review, 63, 277-293.
22. Cary, M., & Reder, L. M. (2003). A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 231-248.
23. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How do the models match the data? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
24. Curran, T., DeBuse, C., & Leynes, P. A. (2007). Conflict and criteria setting in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 2-17.
25. Davis, J. A. (1967). Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations, 20, 181-187.
26. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological review, 108, 452-478.
27. DeSoto, C. B. (1960). Learning a social structure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 417-421.
28. Diana, R. A., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J., & Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1-21.
29. Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review, 111, 524-542.
30. Durso, F. T., & Johnson, M. K. (1980). The effect of orienting tasks on recognition, recall, and modality confusions of pictures and words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 416-429.
31. Egan, J. P. (1958). Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (AFCRC-TN-58-51). Bloomington: Indiana University Hearing and Communication Laboratory.
32. Ehrenberg, K., & Klauer, K. C. (2005). The flexible use of source information: processing components of the inconsistency effect in person memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 369-387.
33. Estes, W. K. (1964). Probability learning. In A. W. Melton, (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 89-128). New York: Academic Press.
34. Freeman, L. C. (1992). Filling in the blanks: A theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliations. Social Science Quarterly, 55, 118-127.
35. Gardiner, J. M., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229-244). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., and the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Gill, J. (2002). Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach. New York: Chapman & Hall.
38. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
39. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5-16.
40. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
41. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
42. Greene, R. L. (1996). Mirror effect in order and associative information: Role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 687-695.
43. Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392-407.
44. Heathcote, A. (2003). Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1210-1230.
45. Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107-112.
46. Hilford, A., Glanzer, M., Kim, K., & DeCarlo, L. T. (2002). Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 494-510.
47. Hintzman, D. L., Block, R. A., & Inskeep, N. R. (1972). Memory for mode of input. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 741-749.
48. Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., & Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, amd Cognition, 18, 667-680.
49. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
50. Hu, X., & Phillips, G. A. (1999). GPT.EXE: A powerful tool for the visualization and analysis of general processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 220-234.
51. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
52. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
53. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
54. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1409-1419.
55. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review. 88, 67-85.
56. Kinchla, R. A. (1994). Comments on Batchelder and Riefer’s multinomial model of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 101, 166-171.
57. Klauer, K. C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-class approach. Psychometrika, 71, 1-31.
58. Klauer, K. C., & Ehrenberg, K. (2005). Categorization and fit detection under cognitive load: Efficient or effortful? European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 493-516.
59. Klauer, K. C., & Meiser, T. (2000). A source-monitoring analysis of illusory correlations. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 26, 1074-1093.
60. Klauer, K. C., & Wegener, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the “who said what” paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1155-1178.
61. Klauer K. C., & Wegener, I. (1999). Die Salienz sozialer Kategorien: Ein Modell der sozialen Kategorisierung im “Who said what?”-Paradigma. In W. Hacker & M. Rinck (Eds.), Schwerpunktthema “Zukunft gestalten” (pp. 366-72). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
62. Klauer, K. C., Wegener, I., & Ehrenberg, K. (2002). Perceiving minority members as individuals: The effects of relative group size in social categorization, European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 223-245.
63. Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. (2004). Predicting one’s own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643-656.
64. Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., & Ma’ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 147-162.
65. Kumbasar, E, Romney, A. K., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Systematic biases in social perception. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 477-505.
66. Lee, M. D., & Webb, M. R. (2005). Modeling individual differences in cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 605-621.
67. Lewandowsky, S. (1986). Priming in recognition memory for categorized lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 562-574.
68. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 368-374.
70. McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjectivelikelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724-760.
71. Meiser, T., & Broder, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137.
72. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Crossed categorization effects on the formation of illusory correlations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 443-466.
73. Meiser, T., Sattler, C., & von Hecker, U. (2007).Metacognitive inferences in source monitoring: The role of perceived differences in item recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 10115-1040.
74. Morrell, H. E. R., Gaitan, S., & Wixted, J. T. (2002). On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection based models of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1095-1110.
75. Nelson, D. L., Reed, U. S., & Walling, J. R. (1976). Picture superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 523-528.
76. Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
77. Nosofsky, R. M. (1990). Relations between exemplar-similarity and likelihood models of classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34, 393-418.
78. Picek, J. S., Sherman, S. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1975). Cognitive organization and storage of social structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 758-768.
79. Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M., Angstadt, P., & Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 294-320.
80. Riefer, D. M., Chien, Y., & Reimer, J. F. (2007). Positive and negative generation effects in source monitoring. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1389-1405.
81. Riefer, D. M., Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 680-693.
82. Rouder, J. N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 573-604.
83. Shepard, R. N., & Teghtsoonian, M. (1961). Retention of information under conditions approaching a steady state. (1961). Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 302-309.
84. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 408-438.
85. Sikstrom, S. (2001). The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 408-438.
86. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
87. Slotnick, S. D., Dodson, C. S., Klein, S. A., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1499-1517.
88. Smith, J. B., and Batchelder, W. H. (2005). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, August 2005, Memphis, TN.
89. Smith, J. B., & Batchelder, W. H. (in press). Assessing individual differences in categorical data. Unpublished manuscript available on request.
90. Staddon, J. E. R., King, M., & Lockhead, G. R. (1980). On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 290-301.
91. Stahl, C. (2006). Multinomiale verarbeitungs-baummodelle in der socialpsychologie (Multinomial processing tree models in social psychology). Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 161-171.
92. Strack, F., & Forster, J. (1998). Self-reflection and recognition: The role of metacognitive knowledge in the attribution of recollective experience. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 111-123.
93. Stretch, V., & Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequencybased mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1379-1396.
94. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. J., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778-793.
95. Thornton, T. L., & Gilden, D. L. (2005). Provenance of correlations in psychological data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 409-441.
96. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1-22.
97. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
98. Van Zandt, T., & Maldonado-Molina, M. M. (2004). Response reversals in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1147-1166.
99. Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T., Post, T. A., & Ney, L. G. (1987). Was the item recalled and if so, by whom? Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 466-479.
100. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Farrell, S., & Ratcliff, R. (2004). Estimation and interpretation of 1/f noise in human cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 579-615.
101. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.