Comparison between micro-and macrosurgical techniques for the treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally positioned flaps and enamel matrix derivative

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 81, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1572-1579

  Andrade, Patrícia F ^a   Grisi, Marcio F M ^a   Marcaccini, Andrea M ^a   Fernandes, Patrícia G ^a   Reino, Danilo M ^a   Souza, Sergio L S ^a   Taba Jr , Mário ^a   Palioto, Daniela B ^a   Novaes Jr , Arthur B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Enamel matrix proteins; Gingival recession; Microsurgery

Indexed keywords

ENAMEL MATRIX PROTEINS; ENAMEL PROTEIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MICROSURGERY; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PERIODONTAL POCKET; PERIODONTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUTURE; SUTURING METHOD; TOOTH ROOT; WOUND HEALING;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ADULT; DENTAL ENAMEL PROTEINS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION, PERIODONTAL; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSURGERY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PERIODONTAL ATTACHMENT LOSS; PERIODONTAL POCKET; SURGICAL FLAPS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; TOOTH ROOT; WOUND HEALING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78249276839     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.100155     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Felipe ME, Andrade PF, Grisi MF, et al. Comparison of two surgical procedures for use of the acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: A randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 2007;78:1209-1217.
2. Cueva MA, Boltchi FE, Hallmon WW, Nunn ME, Rivera-Hidalgo F, Rees T. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 2004;75:949-956.
3. Castellanos A, de la Rosa M, de la Garza M, Caffesse RG. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions. J Periodontol 2006;77:7-14.
4. Trombelli L. Periodontal regeneration in gingival recession defects. Periodontol 2000 1999;19:138-150.
5. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Esposito P, et al. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: A comparative 1-year clinical study. J Periodontol 2002;73:1299-1307. (Pubitemid 35469678)
6. Paolantonio M, di Murro C, Cattabriga A, Cattabriga M. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:51-56.
7. Harris RJ. A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: Guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. Results of a series of consecutive cases. J Periodontol 1998;69:1426-1434.
8. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985;56:715-720.
9. Harris RJ. The connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft: The results of 100 consecutivelytreated defects. J Periodontol 1994;65:448-461.
10. Cordioli G, Mortarino C, Chierico A, Grusovin MG, Majzoub Z. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions. J Periodontol 2001;72:1470-1476.
11. Guinard EA, Caffesse RG. Treatment of localized gingival recessions. Part I. Lateral sliding flap. J Periodontol 1978;49:351-356.
12. Cohen DW, Ross SE. The double papillae repositioned flap in periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1968;39:65-70.
13. Allen EP, Miller PD Jr. Coronal positioning of existing gingiva: Short term results in the treatment of shallow marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 1989;60:316-319.
14. Pini Prato G, Pagliaro U, Baldi C, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Flap with tension versus flap without tension: A randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 2000;71:188-201.
15. Henderson RD, Greenwell H, Drisko C, et al. Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft. J Periodontol 2001;72:571-582.
16. Novaes AB Jr., Grisi DC, Molina GO, Souza SL, Taba M Jr., Grisi MF. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol 2001;72:1477-1484.
17. Barros RR, Novaes AB, Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba MJ, Palioto DB. A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix. J Periodontol 2004;75:1350-1356.
18. Andrade PF, Felipe ME, Novaes AB Jr., et al. Comparison between two surgical techniques for root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:263-269.
19. Pilloni A, Paolantonio M, Camargo PM. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation. J Periodontol 2006;77:2031-2039.
20. Modica F, Del Pizzo M, Roccuzzo M, Romagnoli R. Coronally advanced flap for the treatment of buccal gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study. J Periodontol 2000;71:1693-1698.
21. Hägewald S, Spahr A, Rompola E, Haller B, Heijl L, Bernimoulin JP. Comparative study of Emdogain and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of human gingival recessions. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:35-41.
22. Del Pizzo M, Zucchelli G, Modica F, Villa R, Debernardi C. Coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: A 2-year study. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:1181-1187.
23. Spahr A, Haegewald S, Tsoulfidou F, et al. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: A 2-year report. J Periodontol 2005;76:1871-1880.
24. Cheng YF, Chen JW, Lin SJ, Lu HK. Is coronally positioned flap procedure adjunct with enamel matrix derivative or root conditioning a relevant predictor for achieving root coverage? A systemic review. J Periodontal Res 2007;42:474-485.
25. Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(2):8-13.
26. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(Suppl. 8):136-162.
27. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. A minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative in the regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects: A novel approach to limit morbidity. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:87-93.
28. Francetti L, Del Fabbro M, Calace S, Testori T, Weinstein RL. Microsurgical treatment of gingival recession: A controlled clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25(2):181-188.
29. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Microsurgical approach to periodontal regeneration. Initial evaluation in a case cohort. J Periodontol 2001;72:559-569.
30. Shanelec DA, Tibbetts LS. A perspective on the future of periodontal microsurgery. Periodontol 2000 1996;11:58-64.
31. Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Coverage of localized gingival recessions: Comparison of micro-and macrosurgical techniques. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:287-293.
32. Zucchelli G, Mounssif I, Stefanini M, Mele M, Montebugnoli L, Sforza NM. Hand and ultrasonic instrumentation in combination with root-coverage surgery: A comparative controlled randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2009;80:577-585.
33. Shepherd N, Greenwell H, Hill M, Vidal R, Scheetz JP. Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel with and without platelet-rich plasma: A pilot study in humans. J Periodontol 2009;80:397-404.
34. de Andrade PF, de Souza SL, de Oliveira Macedo G, et al. Acellular dermal matrix as a membrane for guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of Class II furcation lesions: A histometric and clinical study in dogs. J Periodontol 2007;78:1288-1299.
35. Moses O, Artzi Z, Sculean A, et al. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: A 24-month follow-up multicenter study. J Periodontol 2006;77:195-202.
36. Hammarström L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:658-668.
37. Hammarström L, Heijl L, Gestrelius S. Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:669-677.
38. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Moses O. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: Coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2004;75:600-607.
39. Ainamo A, Bergenholtz A, Hugoson A, Ainamo J. Location of the mucogingival junction 18 years after apically repositioned flap surgery. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:49-52.
40. Cattaneo V, Rota C, Silvestri M, et al. Effect of enamel matrix derivative on human periodontal fibroblasts: Proliferation, morphology and root surface colonization. An in vitro study. J Periodontal Res 2003;38:568-574.
41. Miyasato M, Crigger M, Egelberg J. Gingival condition in areas of minimal and appreciable width of keratinized gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:200-209.
42. Wennström JL. Lack of association between width of attached gingiva and development of soft tissue recession. A 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:181-184.
43. Novaes AB, Ruben MP, Kon S, Goldman HM, Novaes AB Jr. The development of the periodontal cleft. A clinical and histopathologic study. J Periodontol 1975;46:701-709.