A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: Coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 600-607

  Nemcovsky, Carlos E ^a   Artzi, Zvi ^a   Tal, Haim ^a   Kozlovsky, Avital ^a   Moses, Ofer ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Comparison studies; Connective tissue; Enamel matrix derivative; Gingival recesion surgery; Grafts; Subpedicle; Surgical flaps; Tooth root surgery

Indexed keywords

MATRIX PROTEIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVARIANCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENAMEL; FEMALE; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATINIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTION; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE FLAP; TISSUE GRAFT; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DENTAL ENAMEL PROTEINS; FEMALE; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GINGIVOPLASTY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH MUCOSA; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 2442438782     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.600     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Wennström J. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol 1996;1:671-701.
2. Borghetti A, Gardella JP. Thick gingival autograft for the coverage of gingival recession: A clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1990;10:216-229.
3. Wennström JL, Pini Prato G. Mucogingival therapy. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, eds. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1998:550-596.
4. Edel A. Clinical evaluation of free connective tissue grafts used to increase the width of keratinised gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1974;1:185-196.
5. Edel A. The use of a free connective tissue graft to increase the width of attached gingiva. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975;39:341-346.
6. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985;56: 715-720.
7. Raetzke PB. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the envelope technique. J Periodontol 1985; 56:397-402.
8. Nelson SW. The subpedicle connective tissue graft. A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces. J Periodontol 1987;58: 95-102.
9. Harris RJ. The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: A predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol 1992;63:477-486.
10. Miller PD. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(5):8-13.
11. Jahnke PV, Sandifer JB, Gher ME, Gray JL, Richardson AC. Thick free gingival and connective tissue autografts for root coverage. J Periodontol 1993;64:315-322.
12. Paolantonio M, Di Murro C, Cattabriga A, Cattabriga M. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:51-56.
13. Harris RJ. Root coverage with connective tissue grafts: An evaluation of short and long term results. J Periodontol 2002;73:1054-1059.
14. Greenwell H, Bissada NF, Henderson RD, Dodge JR. The deceptive nature of root coverage results. J Periodontol 2000;71:1327-1337.
15. Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G, Clauser C. Guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of human facial recession. A 12-case report. J Periodontol 1992;63: 54-60.
16. Pini Prato G, Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Magnani C, Cortellini P, Clauser C. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal recession. J Periodontol 1992;63:919-928.
17. Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with guided tissue regeneration utilizing a bioabsorbable membrane versus the connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft. J Periodontol 1997;68: 779-790.
18. Tatakis DN, Trombelli L. Gingival recession treatment: Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2000;71: 299-307.
19. Weng D, Hürzeler MB, Quinones CR, Pechstadt B, Mota L, Caffesse RG. Healing patterns in recession defects treated with ePTFE membranes and with free connective tissue grafts. A histologic and histometric study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25: 238-245.
20. Jepsen K, Heinz B, Halben JH, Jepsen S. Treatment of gingival recession with titanium reinforced barrier membranes versus connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol 1998;69:383-391.
21. Zucchelli G, Clauser C, De Sanctis M, Calandriello M. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects. J Periodontol 1998;69:138-145.
22. Cortellini P, Clauser C, Pini Prato G. Histologic assessment of new attachment following the treatment of a human buccal recession by means of guided tissue regeneration procedure. J Periodontol 1993;64: 387-391.
23. Roccuzzo M, Lungo M, Corrente G, Gandolfo S. Comparative study of bioresorbable and a non-resorbable membrane in the treatment of human buccal gingival recessions. J Periodontol 1996;67:7-14.
24. Harris RJ. GTR for root coverage: A long-term follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:55-61.
25. Matter J. Free gingival graft and coronally repositioned flap. A 2-year follow-up report. J Clin Periodontol 1979;6: 437-442.
26. Trombelli L, Tatakis DN, Scabbia A, Zimmerman GJ. Comparison of mucogingival changes following treatment with coronally positioned flap and guided tissue regeneration procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:448-455.
27. Lee EJ, Meraw SJ, Oh TJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Comparative histologic analysis of coronally advanced flap with and without collagen membrane for root coverage. J Periodontol 2002;73:779-788.
28. Amarante ES, Leknes KN, Skavland J, Lie T. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recessions. J Periodontol 2000;71:989-998.
29. Allen EP, Miller PD. Coronal positioning of existing gingiva: Short-term results in the treatment of shallow marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 1989;60: 316-319.
30. Harris RJ, Harris AW. The coronally positioned pedicle flap with inlaid margins: A predictable method of obtaining root coverage of shallow defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:229-241.
31. Bernimoulin JP, Lüscher B, Mühlemann HR. Coronally repositioned flap. Clinical evaluation after one year. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:1-13.
32. Tenenbaum H, Klewansky P, Roth JJ. Clinical evaluation of gingival recession treated by coronally repositioned flap technique. J Periodontol 1980;51:686-690.
33. Hägewald S, Spahr A, Rompola E, Haller B, Heijl L, Bernimoulin JP. Comparative study of Emdogain and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of human gingival recessions. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:35-41.
34. Modica F, Del Pizzo M, Roccuzzo M, Romagnoli R. Coronally advanced flap for the treatment of buccal gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study. J Periodontol 2000;71: 1693-1698.
35. Berlucchi I, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Weinstein RL. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow recessions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22: 583-593.
36. Miller PD. Root coverage using a free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application. A successful and predictable procedure in areas of deep-wide recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(5):14-37.
37. Trombelli L, Scabbia A, Wikesjö UME, Calura G. Fibrin glue application in conjunction with tetracycline root conditioning and coronally positioned flap procedure in the treatment of mucogingival defects. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:861-867.
38. Woodyard SG, Snyder AJ, Henley G, O'Neal RB. A histometric evaluation of the effect of citric acid preparation upon healing of coronally positioned flaps in nonhuman primates. J Periodontol 1984;55:203-212.
39. Hammarström L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:658-668.
40. Gestrelius S, Lyngstadaas SP, Hammarström L. Emdogain-periodontal regeneration based on biomimicry. Clin Oral Invest 2000;4:120-125.
41. Zeichner-David M. Is there more to enamel matrix proteins than biomineralization? Matrix Biol 2001;20: 307-316.
42. Heijl L. Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in one human experimental defect. A case report. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:693-696.
43. Hammarström L, Heijl L, Gestrelius S. Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:669-677.
44. Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Schenk RK, Nevins ML. Clinical and histologic evaluation of human gingival recession treated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain): A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20: 269-275.
45. Tal H, Moses O, Zohar R, Meir H, Nemcovsky CE. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: A comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol 2002; 73:1405-1411.
46. Majzoub Z, Landi L, Grusovin MG, Cordioli G. Histology of connective tissue graft. A case report. J Periodontol 2001;72:1607-1615.
47. Goldstein M, Boyan BD, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z. Human histology of new attachment after root coverage using subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:657-662.
48. Carnio J, Camargo PM, Kenney EB, Schenk RK. Histological evaluation of 4 cases of root coverage following a connective tissue graft combined with an enamel matrix derivative preparation. J Periodontol 2002;73: 1534-1543.