Comparative study of two root coverage procedure: A 24-month follow-up multicenter study

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 195-202

  Moses, Ofer ^a   Artzi, Zvi ^a   Sculean, Anton ^b   Tal, Haim ^a   Kozlovsky, Avital ^a   Romanos, Goergios E ^c   Nemcovsky, Carlos E ^a,d  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Enamel matrix proteins; Gingival recession surgery; Surgical flaps; Tooth

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION; TOOTH ROOT; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; GINGIVA; GINGIVOPLASTY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTITIS; PLASTIC SURGERY; TOOTH CERVIX; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ENAMEL MATRIX PROTEINS; ENAMEL PROTEIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DENTAL ENAMEL PROTEINS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GINGIVOPLASTY; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIODONTAL POCKET; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646166839     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.050008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Wennström J. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol 1996;1:671-706.
2. Edel A. Clinical evaluation of free connective tissue grafts used to increase the width of keratinised gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1974;1:185-196.
3. Edel A. The use of a free connective tissue graft to increase the width of attached gingiva. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975;39:341-346.
4. Miller PD. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(2):8-13.
5. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985;56:715-720.
6. Jahnke PV, Sandifer JB, Gher ME, Gray JL, Richardson AC. Thick free gingival and connective tissue autografts for root coverage. J Periodontol 1993;64:315-322.
7. Paolantonio M, Di Murro C, Cattabriga A, Cattabriga M. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:51-56.
8. Harris RJ. Root coverage with connective tissue grafts: An evaluation of short- and long-term results. J Periodontol 2002;73:1054-1059.
9. Greenwell H, Bissada NF, Henderson RD, Dodge JR. The deceptive nature of root coverage results. J Periodontol 2000;71:1327-1337.
10. Tal H, Moses O, Zohar R, Meir H, Nemcovsky CE. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: A comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol 2002;73:1405-1411.
11. Harris RJ. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft. J Periodontol 2004;75:734-743.
12. Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G, Clauser C. Guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of human facial recession. A 12-case report. J Periodontol 1992;63:554-560.
13. Pini Prato G, Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Magnani C, Cortellini P, Clauser C. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal recession. J Periodontol 1992;63:919-928.
14. Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with guided tissue regeneration utilizing a bioabsorbable membrane versus the connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft. J Periodontol 1997;68:779-790.
15. Tatakis DN, Trombelli L. Gingival recession treatment: Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2000;71:299-307.
16. Weng D, Hürzeler MB, Quinones CR, Pechstadt B, Mota L, Caffesse RG. Healing patterns in recession defects treated with ePTFE membranes and with free connective tissue grafts. A histologic and histometric study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25: 238-245.
17. Jepsen K, Heinz B, Halben JH, Jepsen S. Treatment of gingival recession with titanium reinforced barrier membranes versus connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol 1998;69:383-391.
18. Zucchelli G, Clauser C, De Sanctis M, Calandriello M. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects. J Periodontol 1998;69:138-145.
19. Cortellini P, Clauser C, Pini Prato G. Histologic assessment of new attachment following the treatment of a human buccal recession by means of guided tissue regeneration procedure. J Periodontol 1993;64:387-391.
20. Wennström JL, Pini Prato G. Mucogingival therapy. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, eds. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1998:550-596.
21. Harris RJ. GTR for root coverage: A long-term follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:55-61.
22. Matter J. Free gingival graft and coronally repositioned flap. A 2-year follow-up report. J Clin Periodontol 1979;6:437-442.
23. Trombelli L, Tatakis DN, Scabbia A, Zimmerman GJ. Comparison of mucogingival changes following treatment with coronally positioned flap and guided tissue regeneration procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:448-455.
24. Lee EJ, Meraw SJ, Oh TJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Comparative histologic analysis of coronally advanced flap with and without collagen membrane for root coverage. J Periodontol 2002;73:779-788.
25. Amarante ES, Leknes KN, Skavland J, Lie T. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recessions. J Periodontol 2000;71:989-998.
26. Allen EP, Miller PD. Coronal positioning of existing gingiva: Short-term results in the treatment of shallow marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 1989;60: 316-319.
27. Harris RJ, Harris AW. The coronally positioned pedicle flap with inlaid margins: A predictable method of obtaining root coverage of shallow defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:228-241.
28. Bernimoulin JP, Libscher B, Mijhlemann HR. Coronally repositioned flap. Clinical evaluation after one year. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:1-13.
29. Tenenbaum H, Klewansky P, Roth JJ. Clinical evaluation of gingival recession treated by coronally repositioned flap technique. J Periodontol 1980;51: 686-690.
30. Hägewald S, Spahr A, Rompola E, Haller B, Heijl L, Bernimoulin J-P. Comparative study of Emdogain and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of human gingival recessions. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:35-41.
31. Modica F, Del Pizzo M, Roccuzzo M, Romagnoli R. Coronally advanced flap for the treatment of buccal gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study. J Periodontol 2000; 71:1693-1698.
32. Cueva MA, Boltchi FA, Hallmon WW, Nunn ME, Francisco Rivera-Hidalgo F, Rees T. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 2004;75: 949-956.
33. Heijl L. Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in one human experimental defect. A case report. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:693-696.
34. Hammarström L, Heijl L, Gestrelius S. Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:669-677.
35. McGuire MK, Nunn M. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters. J Periodontol 2003;74:1110-1125.
36. McGuire MK, Cochran DL. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histological evaluation. J Periodontol 2003; 74:1126-1135.
37. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Moses O. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: Coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2004;75:600-607.
38. Sculean A, Donos N, Reich E, Brecx M, Karring T. Healing of recession-type defects following treatment with enamel matrix proteins or guided tissue regeneration. A pilot study in monkeys. J Parodontol Implantol Orale 2000;19:19-31.
39. Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Schenk RK, Nevins ML. Clinical and histologic evaluation of human gingival recession treated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain): A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:269-275.
40. Carnio J, Camargo PM, Kenney EB, Schenk RK. Histological evaluation of 4 cases of root coverage following a connective tissue graft combined with an enamel matrix derivative preparation. J Periodontol 2002;73:1534-1543.
41. Carvalho Da Silva R, Joly JC, Martorelli de Lima AF, Tatakis DN. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2004;75:413-419.
42. Harris RJ. The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: A predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol 1992;63:477-486.
43. Keila S, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O, Artzi Z, Weinreb M. In vitro effects of enamel matrix proteins on rat bone marrow cells and gingival fibroblasts. J Dent Res 2004; 83:134-138.
44. Woodyard SG, Snyder AJ, Henley G, O'Neal RB. A histometric evaluation of the effect of citric acid preparation upon healing of coronally positioned flaps in nonhuman primates. J Periodontol 1984;55:203-212.
45. Majzoub Z, Landi L, Grusovin MG, Cordioli G. Histology of connective tissue graft. A case report. J Periodontol 2001;72:1607-1615.
46. Goldstein M, Boyan BD, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z. Human histology of new attachment after root coverage using subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:657-662.