A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix deriative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 75, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 949-956

  Cueva, Marco A ^a,b   Boltchi, Farhard E ^a,b   Hallmon, William W ^a   Nunn, Martha E ^c   Rivera Hidalgo, Francisco ^a,b   Rees, Terry ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b Boston University ^*

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trials, controlled; Clinical trials, randomised; Comparison studies; Enamel matrix derivative; Surgical flaps; Tooth root, surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEEK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENAMEL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCISION; KERATINIZATION; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD; TISSUE FLAP; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 4444372797     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.7.949     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Hall WB. Gingival augmentation/mucogingival surgery. Proceedings of the World Workshop in Clinical Periodontics. Chicago: The American Academy of Periodontology; 1989: VII/1-VII/20.
2. Miller PD. Regenerative and reconstructive periodontal plastic surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1988;32:287-306.
3. Miller PD. Root coverage using a free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application. I. Technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1982;2(1):65-70.
4. Holbrook T, Ochsenbein C. Complete coverage of denuded root surface with a one stage gingival graft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1983;3(3)8-27.
5. Espinal MC, Caffesse RG. Lateral positioned pedicle sliding flap-revised technique in the treatment of localized gingival recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1981;1(5):43-51.
6. Grupe HE, Warren RF. Repair of gingival defects by a sliding flap operation. J Periodontol 1956;27:92-95.
7. Pfeifer J, Heller R. Histological evaluation of full and partial thickness lateral repositioned flaps. A pilot study. J Periodontol 1971;42:331-333.
8. Cohen D, Ross S. The double papillae flap in periodontal surgery. J Periodontol 1968;39:65-70.
9. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985;56:715-720.
10. Allen E, Miller PD. Coronal positioning of existing gingiva: Short term results in the treatment of shallow marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 1989;60: 316-319.
11. Tarnow D. Semilunar coronally repositioned flap. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:182-185.
12. Nelson SW. The subpedicle connective tissue graft. A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces. J Periodontol 1987;58:95-102.
13. Maynard J. Corona] positioning of a previously placed autogenous gingival graft. J Periodontol 1977;48:151-155.
14. Bernimoulin J-P, Lüscher B, Mühlemann HR. Coronally repositioned periodontal flap. Clinical evaluation after one year. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:1-13.
15. Caffesse R, Guinard E. Treatment of localized recessions, part IV: Results after three years. J Periodontol 1980;51: 167-170.
16. Harris RJ. The connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft: The results of 100 consecutively treated defects. J Periodontol 1994;65:448-461.
17. Borghetti A, Louise F. Controlled clinical evaluation of the subpedicle connective tissue graft for the coverage of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1994;65: 1107-1112.
18. Roccuzzo M, Lungo M, Corrente G, Gandolfo S. Comparative study of a bioresorbable and a non-resorbable membrane in the treatment of human buccal gingival recessions. J Periodontol 1996;67:7-14.
19. Boltchi F, Allen EP, Hallmon W. The use of a bioabsorbable barrier for regenerative management of marginal tissue recession. I. Report of 100 consecutive cases. J Periodontol 2000;71:1641-1653.
20. Rachlin G, Koubi G, Dejou J, Franquin JC. The use of a resorbable membrane in mucogingival surgery. Case series. J Periodontol 1996;67:621-626.
21. Pini Prato G, Clauser C, Magnani C, Cortellini P. Resorbable membranes in the treatment of human buccal recession: A nine-case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15:258-267.
22. Harris RJ. A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: Guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. Results of a series of consecutive cases. J Periodontol 1998;69:1426-1434.
23. De Sanctis M, Zucchelli G. Guided tissue regeneration with a resorbable barrier membrane (Vicryl) for the management of buccal recession: A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996; 16:435-441.
24. Zucchelli G, Clauser C, De Sanctis M, Calandriello M. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects. J Periodontol 1998;69:138-145.
25. Hammarström L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24: 658-668.
26. Zetterström O, Andersson C. Clinical safety of enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) in the treatment of periodontal defects. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:697-704.
27. Gestrelius S, Andersson C. In vitro studies on periodontal ligament cells and enamel matrix derivative. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:685-692.
28. Hammarström L, Heijl L. Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix derivative. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24: 669-677.
29. Heijl L. Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in one human experimental defect. A case report. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:693-696.
30. Sculean A, Reich E. Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogain): A report or 32 cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:157-164.
31. Heden G. A case report study of 72 consecutive Emdogain-treated intrabony periodontal defects: Clinical and radiographic findings after 1 year. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;21:127-139.
32. Heinz B, Jepsen K, Arjomand M, Jepsen S. Enamel matrix derivative in the simultaneous treatment of multiple recession defects. J Periodontol 2000;71:1664-1665.
33. Miller PD. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(2):8-13.
34. O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor GE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972;43:38.
35. Fasske E, Morgenroth K. Comparative stomatoscopic and histochemical studies of the marginal gingiva in man. Parodontologie 1958;12:151-160.
36. Wennström JL, Zucchelli G. Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2-year prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:770-777.
37. Greenwell H, Bissada N. The deceptive nature of root coverage results. J Periodontol 2000;71:1327-1337.
38. Modica F, Del Pizzo M. Coronally advanced flap for the treatment of buccal gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study. J Periodontol 2000;71:1693-1698.
39. Hägewald S, Spahr A, Rompola E, Haller B, Heijl L, Bernimoulin J-P. Comparative study of Emdogain and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of human gingival recessions. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:35-41.
40. Berlucchi I, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Weinstein R. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22:583-593.
41. Aukhil I, Iglhaut J. Periodontal ligament cell kinetics following experimental regenerative procedures. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:374-382.
42. Suzuki N, Ohyama M. Attachment of human periodontal ligament cells to enamel matrix-derived protein is mediated via interaction between BSP-like molecules and integrin αvβ3. J Periodontol 2001;72:1520-1526.