Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 7-14

  Castellanos, Adriana T ^a,b   de la Rosa, Manuel R ^a,b   de la Garza, Myriam ^a   Caffesse, Raul G ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE NUEVO LEÓN   (Mexico)

^b NONE   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Enamel; Flap; Gingival recession; Root; Surgical flaps

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENAMEL; FEMALE; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATINIZATION; MALE; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE FLAP; TOOTH ROOT; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PERIODONTICS; PERIODONTITIS; PLASTIC SURGERY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH PLAQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ENAMEL MATRIX PROTEINS; ENAMEL PROTEIN; KERATIN;

ADULT; AGED; DENTAL ENAMEL PROTEINS; DENTAL PLAQUE INDEX; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; HUMANS; KERATINS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIODONTAL ATTACHMENT LOSS; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PERIODONTAL POCKET; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646176403     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.77.1.7     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Miller AJ, Brunelle JA, Carlos JP, Brown LJ, Löe H. Oral Health of United States Adults. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Dental Research; 1987. NIH publication no. 87-2868.
2. Pini Prato G. Mucogingival deformities. Ann Periodontol 1999;4:98-100.
3. Lang K, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol 1972;13:623-627.
4. Seichter U. Root surface caries: A critical literature review. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;115:305-309.
5. Löe H, Anerud A, Boysen H. The natural history of periodontal disease in man: Prevalence, severity and extent of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1992; 63:489-495.
6. Guinard E, Caffesse R. Treatment of localized gingival recession. Part I. Lateral sliding flap. J Periodontol 1978;49:351-356.
7. Joshipura K, Kent R, De Paola P. Gingival recession: Intraoral distribution and associated factors. J Periodontol 1994;65:864-871.
8. Wennström J. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol 1996;1:671-706.
9. Mlinek A, Smukler H, Buchner A. The use of free gingival grafts for the root coverage of denuded roots. J Periodontol 1973;44:248-254.
10. Holbrook T, Ochsenbein C. Complete coverage of the denuded root surface with a one-stage gingival graft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1983;3(3):8-27.
11. Miller PD. Root coverage using free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application. III. A successful and predictable procedure in areas of deep-wide recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985; 5(2):14-37.
12. Borghetti A, Gardella JP. Thick gingival autograft for the coverage of gingival recession: A clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1990;10:216-229.
13. Raetzke PB. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the "envelope" technique. J Periodontol 1985;56:397-402.
14. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985; 56:715-720.
15. Nelson SW. The subpedicle connective tissue graft. A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage or denuded root surfaces. J Periodontol 1987;58:95-102.
16. Harris RJ. Creeping attachment associated with the connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft. J Periodontol 1997;68:890-899.
17. Smukler H. Laterally positioned mucoperiosteal pedicle grafts in the treatment of denuded roots. A clinical and statistical study. J Periodontol 1976;47:590-595.
18. Caffesse RG, Alspach SR, Morrison EC, Burgett FG. Lateral sliding flaps with and without citric acid. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1987;7(6):42-57.
19. Allen EP, Miller PD. Coronal positioning of existing gingival: Short-term results in the treatment of shallow marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 1989;60: 316-319.
20. Romanos GE, Bernimoulin J-P, Marggraf E. The double lateral bridging flap for coverage of denuded root surface: Longitudinal study and clinical evaluation after 5 to 8 years. J Periodontol 1993;64: 683-688.
21. Pini-Prato G, Baldi C, Pagliaro U, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage treatment of root surface: Root planing versus polishing. J Periodontol 1999;70:1064-1076.
22. Ricci G, Silvestri M, Tinti C, Rasperini G. A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:538-545.
23. Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with guided tissue regeneration utilizing a bioabsorbable membrane versus the connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft. J Periodontol 1997;68:779-790.
24. Jepsen K, Heinz B, Halben JH, Jepsen S. Treatment of gingival recession with titanium reinforced barrier membranes versus connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol 1998;69:383-391.
25. Bernimoulin J-P, Lüscher B, Mühlemann HR. Coronally repositioned flap. Clinical evaluation after one year. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:1-13.
26. Tenenbaum H, Klewansky P, Roth JJ. Clinical evaluation of gingival recession treated by coronally repositioned flap technique. J Periodontol 1980;51: 686-690.
27. Wennström J, Zucchelli G. Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2-year prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:770-777.
28. Trombelli L, Tatakis DN, Scabbia A, Zimmerman GJ. Comparison of mucogingival changes following treatment with coronally positioned flap and guided tissue regeneration procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:448-455.
29. Allen EP. Use of mucogingival surgical procedures to enhance esthetics. Dent Clin N Am 1988;32:307-330.
30. Modica F, Del Pizzo M, Rocuzzo M, Romagnoli R. Coronally advanced flap for the treatment of buccal gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study. J Periodontol 2000; 71:1693-1698.
31. Wennström J, Pini Prato G. Mucogingival therapy. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang N, eds. Clin Periodontol and Impl Dent. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1998:550-596.
32. Gestrelius S, Andersson C, Johansson AC, et al. Formulation of enamel matrix derivative for surface coating. Kinetics and cell colonization. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:678-684.
33. Hammarström L. Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24: 658-668.
34. Hammarström L, Heijl L, Gestrelius S. Periodontal regeneration in a bucal dehiscensce model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:669-677.
35. Heijl L, Heden G, Svärdström G, Östgren A. Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24:705-714.
36. Pontoriero R, Wennström J, Lindhe J. The use of barrier membranes and enamel matrix proteins in the treatment of angular bone defects. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26:833-840.
37. Sculean A, Reich E, Chiantella GD, Brecx M. Comparison of enamel matrix proteins and bioabsorbable membranes in the treatment of infrabony defects. A split mouth study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:157-163.
38. Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Schenk RK, Nevins ML, Nevins M. Clinical and histological evaluation of human gingival recession treated with subepithelial connective tissue graft plus enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain): A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:269-275.
39. Hägewald S, Spahr A, Rampola E, Haller B, Heijl L, Bernimoulin J-P. Comparative study of Emdogain and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of human gingival recessions. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:35-41.
40. McGuire MK, Nunn M. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters. J Periodontol 2003;74:1110-1125.
41. Heijl L. Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in one human experimental defect. A case report. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:693-696.
42. Löe H. The gingival index, plaque index and the retention index system. J Periodontol 1967;38:610-616.
43. Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of vitamin C. J Periodontol 1970;41:41-43.
44. Vincenzi G, De Chiesa A, Trisi P. Guided tissue regeneration using a resorbable membrane in gingival recession-type defects. A histologic case report in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18:24-33.
45. Cueva MA, Boltchi FE, Hallmon WW, Nunn ME, Rivera-Hidalgo F, Rees T. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 2004;75:949-956.
46. Pini Prato G, Pagliaro U, Baldi C, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Flap with tension versus flap without tension: A randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 2000;71:188-201.
47. Karring T, Ostergaard E, Löe H. Conservation of tissue specificity after heterotopic transplantation of gingival and alveolar mucosa. J Periodontal Res 1971;6:282-293.
48. Karring T, Cumming BR, Oliver RC, Löe H. The origin of granulation tissue and its impact on postoperative results of mucogingival surgery. J Periodontol 1975; 46:577-585.
49. McGuire MK, Cochran D. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histological evaluation. J Periodontol 2003;74:1126-1135.
50. Suzuki N, Ohyama M. Attachment of human periodontal ligament cells to enamel matrix-derived protein is mediated via interaction between BSP-like molecules and integrin ανβ3. J Periodontol 2001; 72:1520-1526.