Cluster subtypes on the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) in a traumatic brain injury sample

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 953-960

  Dejong, Joy ^a   Donders, Jacobus ^a  

^a MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Learning; Memory; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN INJURY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMA; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE TEST; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN INJURIES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMA; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VERBAL LEARNING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78249259084     PISSN: 13803395     EISSN: 1744411X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803391003645640     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baldo, J. V., Delis, D., Kramer, J., & Shimamura, A. (2002). Memory performance on the California Verbal Learning Test-II: Findings from patients with focal frontal lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 539-546.
2. Blashfield, R. K. (1976). Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 377-388.
3. Carroll, L. J., Cassidy, J. D., Peloso, P. M., Borg, J., von Holst, H., Holm, L., et al. (2004). Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, S43, 84-105. (Pubitemid 38268224)
4. Carter, R. L., Morris, R., & Blashfield, R. K. (1989). On the partitioning of squared Euclidean distance and its applications in cluster analysis. Psychometrika, 54, 9-23.
5. Curtiss, G., Vanderploeg, R. D., Spencer, J., & Salazar, A. M. (2001). Patterns of verbal learning and memory in traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 574-585.
6. DeJong, J., & Donders, J. (2009). A confirmatory factor analysis of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) in a traumatic brain injury sample. Assessment, 16, 328-336.
7. Delis, D. C., & Fridlund, A. J. (2000). CVLT-II comprehensive scoring program. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
8. Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
9. Delis, D. C., Wetter, S. R., Jacobson, M. W., Peavy, G., Hamilton, J., Gongvatana, A., et al. (2005). Recall discriminability: Utility of a new CVLT-II measure in the differential diagnosis of dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 708-715.
10. Desphande, S. A., Millis, S. R., Reeder, K. P., Fuerst, D., & Ricker, J. H. (1996). Verbal learning subtypes in traumatic brain injury: A replication. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 836-842.
11. Donders, J. (1996). Cluster subtypes in the WISC-III standardization sample: Analysis of factor index scores. Psychological Assessment, 8, 312-318.
12. Donders, J. (1999). Cluster subtypes in the standardization sample of the California Verbal Learning Test-Children's Version. Developmental Neuropsychology, 15, 395-406. (Pubitemid 29233066)
13. Donders, J. (2006). Performance discrepancies on the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) in the standardization sample. Psychological Assessment, 18, 458-463.
14. Donders, J. (2008a). A confirmatory factor analysis of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) in the standardization sample. Assessment, 15, 123-131.
15. Donders, J. (2008b). Subtypes of learning and memory on the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) in the standardization sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 741-748.
16. Donders, J., & Nienhuis, J. B. (2007). Utility of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition recall discriminability indices in the evaluation of traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 354-358. (Pubitemid 46487365)
17. Donders, J., Tulsky, D. S., & Zhu, J. (2001). Criterion validity of new WAIS-III subtest scores after traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 892-898.
18. Eslinger, P. J., Zappala, G., Chakara, F., & Barrett, A. M. (2007). Cognitive impairments after TBI. In N. D. Zasler, D. I. Katz, & R. D. Zafonte (Eds.), Brain injury medicine (pp. 779-790). New York: Demos.
19. Fuerst, D. R., & Rourke, B. P. (1995). Psychosocial functioning of children with learning disabilities at three age levels. Child Neuropsychology, 1, 38-55.
20. Hair, J. F., & Black, W. C. (2002). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147-205). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Hanks, R. A., Ricker, J. H., & Millis, S. R. (2004). Empirical evidence regarding the neuropsychological assessment of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. In J. H. Ricker (Ed.), Differential diagnosis in adult neuropsychological assessment (pp. 218-242). New York: Springer.
22. Jacobs, M. L., & Donders, J. (2007). Criterion validity of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 143-149. (Pubitemid 46371362)
23. Milligan, G. W. (1980). An examination of the effects of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika, 50, 325-342.
24. Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159-179.
25. Milligan, G. W., & Hirtle, S. C. (2003). Clustering and classification methods. In J. Schinka & W. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 165-186). New York: Wiley.
26. Moore, B. A., & Donders, J. (2004). Predictors of invalid neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 975-984. (Pubitemid 39199468)
27. Mottram, L., & Donders, J. (2006). Cluster subtypes on the California Verbal Learning Test-Children's Version after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 30, 865-883.
28. SAS (1990). SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6, 4th ed., vol. 1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
29. Schinka, J., Vanderploeg, R., & Greblo, P. (1998). Frequency of WISC-III and WAIS-R pairwise subtest differences. Psychological Assessment, 10, 171-175.
30. Strong, C. A. H., Donders, J., & Van Dyke, S. (2005). Validity of demographically corrected norms for the WAIS-III. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 746-758.
31. Van der Heijden, P., & Donders, J. (2003). WAIS-III factor index score patterns after traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 10, 115-122.
32. Wechsler, W. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
33. Wiegner, S., & Donders, J. (1999). Performance on the California Verbal Learning Test after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 159-170.