Performance discrepancies on the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) in the standardization sample

Psychological Assessment

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 458-463

  Donders, Jacobus ^a  

^a MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition; Discrepancies; Learning; Memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LEARNING; LEARNING TEST; MEMORY; MENTAL CAPACITY; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; RATING SCALE; STANDARDIZATION;

CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 33845660377     PISSN: 10403590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.458     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baldo, J. V., Delis, D., Kramer, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (2002). Memory performance on the California Verbal Learning Test II: Findings from patients with focal frontal lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 539-546.
2. Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1987). California Verbal Learning Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
3. Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
4. Delis, D. C., Massman, P. J., Butters, N., Salmon, D. P., Cermak, L. S., & Kramer, J. H. (1991). Profiles of demented and amnesic patients on the California Verbal Learning Test: Implications of the assessment of memory disorders. Psychological Assessment, 3, 19-26.
5. Delis, D. C., Wetter, S. R., Jacobson, M. W., Peavy, G., Hamilton, J., Gongvatana, A., et al. (2005). Recall discriminability: Utility of a new CVLT-II measure in the differential diagnosis of dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 708-715.
6. Donders, J. (1999). Performance discrepancies on the California Verbal Learning Test - Children's Version in the standardization sample. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 26-31.
7. Dori, G. A., & Chelune, G. J. (2004). Education-stratified base-rate information on discrepancy scores within and between the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition and the Wechsler Memory Scale - Third Edition. Psychological Assessment, 16, 146-154.
8. Doyle, E. P., Duff, K., Schoenberg, M. R., Mold, J., Scott, J. G., & Adams, R. L. (2006). RBANS index discrepancies: Base rates for older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 151-160.
9. Duchnick, J. J., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Curtiss, G. (2002). Identifying retrieval problems using the California Verbal Learning Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 840-851.
10. Elwood, R. W. (1995). The California Verbal Learning Test: Psychometric characteristics and clinical application. Neuropsychology Review, 5, 173-201.
11. Gershberg, F. B., & Shimamura, A. P. (1995). Impaired use of organizational strategies in free recall following frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1305-1333.
12. Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley.
13. McDonald, C. R., Bauer, R. M., Grande, L., Gilmore, R., & Roper, S. (2001). The role of the frontal lobes in memory: Evidence from unilateral frontal resections for relief of intractable epilepsy. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 571-585.
14. Mittenberg, W., Thompson, G. B., & Schwartz, J. A. (1991). Abnormal and reliable differences among Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised subtests. Psychological Assessment, 3, 492-495.
15. Moore, B. A., & Donders, J. (2004). Predictors of invalid neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 975-984.
16. Reynolds, C. R. (1984). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 18, 451-475.
17. Schretlen, D. J., Munro, C. A., Anthony, J. C., & Pearlson, G. D. (2003). Examining the range of normal intraindividual variability in neuropsychological test performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 864-870.
18. Skeel, R. L., & Edwards, S. (2001). The assessment and rehabilitation of memory impairments. In B. Johnstone & H. H. Stonnington (Eds.), Rehabilitation of neuropsychological disorders (pp. 53-85). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
19. Smith, M. L., Leonard, G., Crane, J., & Milner, B. (1995). The effects of frontal- or temporal-lobe lesions on susceptibility to interference in spatial memory. Neuropsychologia, 33, 275-285.
20. Stricker, J. L., Brown, G. G., Wixted, J., Baldo, J. V., & Delis, D. C. (2002). New semantic and serial clustering indices for the California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition: Background, rationale, and formulae. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 425-435.
21. Tulsky, D. S., Rolfhus, E. L., & Zhu, J. (2000). Two-tailed versus one-tailed base rates of discrepancy scores in the WAIS-III. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 451-460.
22. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
23. Wiegner, S., & Donders, J. (1999). Performance on the California Verbal Learning Test after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 159-170.
24. Wilde, M. C., Boake, C., & Sherer, M. (1995). Do recognition-free recall discrepancies detect retrieval deficits in closed-head injury? An exploratory analysis with the California Verbal Learning Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 849-855.