The paradox of de-coupling: A study of flexible work program and workers' productivity

Social Science Research

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 299-311

  Yang, Song ^a   Zheng, Lu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

De coupling; Flexible work; Flextime; Neo institutional theory; Productivity; Sociology of organizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149467340     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Appelbaum E., Batt R. The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States 1994, ILR Press, New York.
2. Baltes B.B., Briggs T.E., Huff J.W., Wright J.A., Neuman G.A. Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: a meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology 1999, 84:496-513.
3. Becker G.S. The Economics of Discrimination 1957, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. Becker G.S. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education 1993, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. third ed.
5. Bielby D., Bielby W.T. She works hard for her money: household responsibilities and the allocation of work effort. American Journal of Sociology 1988, 93:1031-1059.
6. Burawoy M. Manufacturing Consent 1979, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2005. Workers on Flexible and Shift Schedules in 2004: Summary. USDL 05-1198, July 1.
8. Caldwell D., O'Reilly C. Measuring person-job fit with a profile comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology 1990, 75:648-657.
9. Cappelli P., Bassi L., Katz H., Knoke D., Osterman P., Useem M. Change at Work 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
10. Chawla R.K. The changing profile of dual-earner families. Perspectives on Labour and Income 1992, 4:22-29.
11. Chevalier A., Harmon C., Walker I., Zhu Y. Does education raise productivity, or just reflect it?. Economic Journal 2004, 114:499-517.
12. Cole J.R., Zuckerman H. The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement 1984, 2:217-258.
13. Dalton M. Conflicts between staff and line managerial officers. American Sociological Review 1950, 25:342-351.
14. Davis A.E., Kalleberg A. Family-friendly organizations? Work and family programs in the 1990s. Work and Occupations 2006, 33:191-223.
15. Davis, J.A., Smith, T.W., Marsden, P.V., 2002. General Social Survey (GSS) ICPSR Version. National Opinion Research Center [producer], Chicago, IL, 2003. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI, 2003.
16. deCarufel A., Schaan J.L. The impact of compressed workweeks on police job involvement. Canadian Police College Journal 1990, 14:81-97.
17. Delaney, J.T., Lewin, D., Ichniowski, C., 1989. Human Resource Policies and Practices in American Firms. US Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations and Cooperative Programs, Washington, DC.
18. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 1983, 48:147-160.
19. Edelman L.B. Legal environments and organizational governance: the expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology 1990, 95:1401-1440.
20. Edelman L.B. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology 1992, 97:1531-1576.
21. Epstein C.F., Kalleberg A.L. Fighting for Time: Shifting Boundaries of Work and Social Life 2006, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
22. Estlund C. Working together: crossing color lines at work. Labor History 2005, 46:79-98.
23. Fenwick R., Tausig M. Scheduling stress: family and health outcomes of shift work and schedule control. American Behavioral Scientist 2001, 44:1179-1198.
24. Glass J., Estes S. The family responsive workplace. Annual Review of Sociology 1997, 23:289-313.
25. Glisson C.A., Martin P.Y. Productivity and efficiency in human service organizations as related to structure, size, and age. Academy of Management Journal 1980, 23:21-37.
26. Golden L. Flexible work schedules: which workers get them?. American Behavioral Scientist 2001, 44:1157-1178.
27. Goudner A.W. Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy 1954, Free Press, New York.
28. Haltivanger J.C., Lane J.I., Spletzer J.I. Productivity differences across employers: the roles of employer size, age and human capital. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 1999, 89:94-98.
29. Hammer L.B., Barbara K.M. Toward an integration of alternative work. Human Resource Planning 1997, 20:28-37.
30. Hobson C.J., Delunas L., Kesic D. Compelling evidence of the need for corporate work/life balance initiatives: results from a national survey of stressful life-events. Journal of Employment Counseling 2001, 38:38-45.
31. Johnson N.B., Provan K. The relationship between work/family benefits and earnings: a test of competing predictions. Journal of Socio-Economics 1995, 24:571-584.
32. Kalev A., Kelly E., Dobbin F. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review 2006, 71:589-617.
33. Kalleberg A.L., Marsden P., Reynolds J., Knoke D. Beyond profit? Sectoral differences in high-performance work practices. Work and Occupations 2006, 33:271-302.
34. Kelleberg A.L. The Mismatched Worker 2007, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
35. Kelly E.L. Theorizing corporate family policies: how advocates built "the Business Case" for "Family-Friendly" programs. Research in the Sociology of Work 1999, 7:169-202.
36. Kelly E.L., Kalev A. Managing flexible work arrangements in US organizations: formalized discretion or 'Right to Ask'. Socio-Economic Review 2006, 4:379-416.
37. Kim J.S., Campagna A.F. Effects of flextime on employee attendance and performance: a field experiment. Academy of Management Journal 1981, 24:729-741.
38. Kossek E.E., Barber A.E., Winters D. Using flexible schedules in the managerial world: the power of peers. Human Resource Management 1999, 38:33-46.
39. Laabs J. They want more support - inside and outside of work. Workforce 1998, 77:54-56.
40. Lawler E.E., Mohrman S.A., Ledford G.E. Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000 Companies 1992, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
41. Leicht K.T., Fennell M. The changing organizational context of professional work. Annual Review of Sociology 2007, 23:215-231.
42. Leicht K., Wallace M. The property rights of jobs: job entitlement versus managerial prerogative in manufacturing firms. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 1988, 7:189-221.
43. McGuire J.B., Liro J.R. Flexible work schedules, work attributes, and perceptions of productivity. Public Personnel Management 1986, 15:65-73.
44. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 1977, 83:340-363.
45. Mincer J. Human capital: a review. Labor Economics and Industrial Relations: Markets and Institutions 1994, 109-141. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Kerr, P.D. Staudohar (Eds.).
46. Murrell A.J., James H. Gender and diversity in organization: past, present, and future directions. Sex Roles 2001, 45:243-257.
47. Narayanan V.K., Nath R. Hierarchical level and the impact of flextime. Industrial Relations 1982, 21:216-230.
48. Nee V., Ingram P. Embeddedness and beyond: institutions, exchange, and social structure. The New Institutionalism in Sociology 1998, 19-45. Stanford University Press, California. M.C. Brinton, V. Nee (Eds.).
49. Nollen S.D., Martin V.H. Alternative Work Schedules: Flextime 1978, AMACOM, New York.
50. Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 1991, 106:145-167.
51. Porter L.W., Steers R.M. Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin 1973, 80:151-176.
52. Raudenbush S., Bryk A. Hierarchical Linear Models 2002, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. second ed.
53. Ryan A., Kossek E. Work-life policy implementation: breaking down or creating barriers to inclusiveness. Human Resource Management 2008, 47(2):295-310.
54. Scandura T.A., Lankau M.J. Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior 1997, 18:377-391.
55. Schein V.E., Mauer E.H., Novak J.F. Impact of flexible working hours on productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology 1977, 62:463-465.
56. Schultz T.W. Investment in human capital. American Economic Review 1961, 51:1-17.
57. Scott R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests 2008, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. third ed.
58. Shepard E.M.I.I.I., Clifton T.J., Kruse D. Flexible work hours and productivity: some evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Relations 1996, 35:123-139.
59. Shirbekk V. Age and individual productivity: a literature survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2004, 1(1):133-153.
60. Smith, T.W., Kallberg, A.L., Marsden, P.V., 2002. National Organizations Survey (NOS) [Computer file]. ICPSR Version. National Opinion Research Center (NORC) [producer], Chicago, IL, 2003. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], Ann Arbor, MI, 2004.
61. Tomaskovic-Devey D. Labor force composition, market concentration, structural power, and industrial productivity. Industries, Firms, and Jobs: Sociological and Economic Approaches 1988, 66-97. Plenum Press, New York. G. Farkas, P. England (Eds.).
62. Topel R. Specific capital, mobility, and wages: wages rise with job seniority. Journal of Political Economy 1991, 99:145-176.
63. Tsang M.C., Rumberger R.W., Levin H.M. The impact of surplus schooling on worker productivity. Industrial Relations 1991, 30:209-228.
64. Walker I., Smith H. Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York.
65. Westphal J.D., Zajac E.J. Substance and symbolism in CEOs' long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly 1994, 39:367-390.
66. Westphal J.D., Zajac E.J. The symbolic management of stockholders: corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly 1998, 43:127-153.
67. Westphal J.D., Zajac E.J. Decoupling policy from practice: the case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly 2001, 46:202-228.
68. Wilson W.J. The Declining Significance of Race 1978, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
69. Yang S. Bureaucracy versus high performance: work reorganization in the 1990s. Journal of Socio-Economics 2008, 37:1825-1845.
70. Zuckerman E.W. The categorical imperative: securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology 1999, 104:1398-1438.