Transit userś route-choice modelling in transit assignment: A review

Transport Reviews

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 753-769

  Liu, Yulin ^a   Bunker, Jonathan ^a   Ferreira, Luis ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUTURE PROSPECT; HEURISTICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; RESEARCH WORK; ROUTING; STOCHASTICITY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 78149367100     PISSN: 01441647     EISSN: 14645327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01441641003744261     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Anez, J., de La Barra, T., and Perez, B. (1996) Dual graph representation of transport networks. Transportation Research, 30B(3), pp. 209-216.
2. Atkins, S. (1994) Passenger Information at Bus Stops (PIBS): Report on Monitoring Studies of Route 18 Demonstration. Unpublished London Transport Report.
3. Avineri, E. (2004) A cumulative Prospect Theory approach to passengers behavior modeling: waiting time paradox revisited. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(4), pp. 195-204.
4. Avineri, E. and Prashker, J. N. (2003) Sensitivity to uncertainty: need for a paradigm shift. Transportation Research Record, 1854, pp. 90-98.
5. Babazadeh, A. and Aashtiani, H. Z. (2005) Algorithm for equilibrium transit assignment problem. Transportation Research Record, 1923, pp. 227-235.
6. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. R. (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press).
7. Bouzaiene-Ayari, B., Gendreau, M. and Nguyen, S. (1995) An Equilibrium-Fixed Point Model for Passenger Assignment in Congested Transit Networks. Publication no. CRT-95-97 (Montreal: Universite de Montreal).
8. Caulfield, B. and O' Mahnoy, M. (2009) A stated preference analysis of real-time public transit stop information. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(3), pp. 1-20.
9. Cepeda, M., Cominetti, R. and Florian, M. (2006) A frequency-based assignment model for congested transit networks with strict capacity constraints: characterization and computation of equilibria. Transportation Research, 40B(6), pp. 437-459.
10. Chriqui, C. and Robillard, P. (1975) Common bus lines. Transportation Science, 9(2), pp. 115-121.
11. Cominetti, R. and Correa, J. (2001) Common-lines and passenger assignment in congested transit networks. Transportation Science, 35(3), pp. 250-267.
12. Coppola, P. and Rosati, L. (2009) Simulation-based evaluation of advanced public transportation information systems (APTIS), in: N. H. M Wilson and A. Nuzzolo (Eds) Schedule-Based Modeling of Transportation Networks: Theory and Applications, pp. 195-216 (New York: Springer).
13. Daganzo, C. F. and Sheffi, Y. (1977) On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transportation Science, 11(3), pp. 253-274.
14. de Cea, J., Bunster, J. P., Zubieta, L. and Florian, M. (1988) Optimal strategies and optimal routes in public transit assignment models: an empirical comparison. Traffic Engineering & Control, 29(10), pp. 520-526.
15. de Cea, J. and Fernandez, J. E. (1989) Transit assignment to minimal routes: an efficient new algorithm. Traffic Engineering & Control, 30(10), pp. 491-494.
16. de Cea, J. and Fernandez, J. E. (1993) Transit assignment for congested public transport systems: an equilibrium model. Transportation Science, 27(2), pp. 133-147.
17. Dial, R. B. (1967) Transit pathfinder algorithm. Highway Research Board, 205, pp. 67-85.
18. Douglas, N. and Karpouzis, G. (2005) Estimating the passenger cost of station crowding. Paper presented at the 28th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Sydney, October.
19. Douglas, N. and Karpouzis, G. (2006) Estimating the passenger cost of train overcrowding. Paper presented at the 29th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Auckland, October.
20. Dziekan, K. and Kottenhoff, K. (2007) Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers. Transportation Research, 41A(6), pp. 489-501.
21. Gärling, T. (1998) Behavioural assumptions overlooked in travel-choice modelling, in: J. de Dios Ortuzar, D. Hensher and S. Jara-Diaz (Eds) Travel Behaviour Research: Updating the State of Play, pp. 1-25 (New York: Elsevier).
22. Gendreau, M. (1984) Une Etude Approfondie d'un Module d'rquilibre Pour l'affectation des Passagers dans les Rrseaux de Transport en Commun [An in-depth study of an equilibrium model for passengers assignment in public transport networks]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universite de Montreal.
23. Gentile, G., Nguyen, S. and Pallottino, S. (2005) Route choice on transit networks with online information at stops. Transportation Science, 39(3), pp. 289-297.
24. Hall, R. W. (1982) Traveler route choice under six information scenarios: transit level of service implications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California.
25. Hamdouch, Y. and Lawphongpanich, S. (2008) Schedule-based transit assignment model with travel strategies and capacity constraints. Transportation Research, 42B(7), pp. 663-684.
26. Hazelton, M. L. (1998) Some remarks on stochastic user equilibrium. Transportation Research, 32B(2), pp. 101-108.
27. Hess, S. (2005) Advanced discrete choice models with applications to transport demand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Imperial College London.
28. Hickman, M. D. (1993) Assessing the impact of real-time information on transit passenger behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
29. Hickman, M. D. and Bernstein, D. H. (1997) Transit service and path choice models in stochastic and time-dependent networks. Transportation Science, 31, pp. 129-146.
30. Hickman, M. D. and Wilson, N. H. M. (1995) Passenger travel time and path choice implications of real-time transit information. Transportation Research, 3C(4), pp. 211-226.
31. Huang, H. J., Tian, Q., Yang, H. and Gao, Z. Y. (2004) Modeling the equilibrium bus riding behavior in morning rush hour. Paper presented at the 9th annual conference of the Hong Kong Society of Transportation Studies, Hong Kong, May.
32. Hunt, J. A. (1990) Logit model for public transport route choice. ITE Journal, 12, pp. 26-30.
33. Jansson, K. and Ridderstolpe, B. (1992) A method for the route-choice problem in public transport systems. Transportation Science, 26(3), pp. 246-251.
34. Jollife, J. K. and Hutchinson, T. P. (1975) A behavioural explanation of the association between bus and passenger arrivals at a bus stop. Transportation Science, 9(3), pp. 248-282.
35. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (pre-1986), 47(2), pp. 263-291.
36. Lam, S.-H. and Xie, F. (2002) Transit path-choice models that use revealed preference and stated preference data. Transportation Research Record, 1799, pp. 58-65.
37. Lam, W. H. K., Chung-Yu, C. and Lam, C. F. (1999a) A study of crowding effects at the Hong Kong light rail transit stations. Transportation Research, 33A(5), pp. 401-415.
38. Lam, W. H. K., Gao, Z. Y., Chan, K. S. and Yang, N. (1999b) A stochastic user equilibrium assignment model for congested transit networks. Transportation Research, 33B(5), pp. 351-368.
39. Last, A. and Leak, S. E. (1976) Transept: a bus model. Traffic Engineering & Control, 17(1), pp. 14-17.
40. le Clercq, F. (1972) A public transport assignment model. Traffic Engineering & Control, 14(1), pp. 91-96.
41. Lo, H. K., Yip, C.-W. and Wan, Q. K. (2004) Modeling competitive multi-modal transit services: a Nested Logit approach. Transportation Research, 12C(3), pp. 251-272.
42. Mahmassani, H. S. (1997) Dynamics of commuter behaviour: Recent research and continuing challenges, in: P. Stopher and M. Lee-Gosselin (Eds) Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change, pp. 279-313 (Oxford: Pergamon).
43. Marguier, P. H. J. (1981) Optimal strategies in waiting for common bus lines. Unpublished master's dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
44. Marguier, P. H. J. and Ceder, A. (1984) Passenger waiting strategies for overlapping bus routes. Transportation Science, 18(3), pp. 207-230.
45. McFadden, D. (2000) Disaggregate behavioural travel demand's rum side: a 30 years retrospective, in: D. Hensher (Ed) Travel Behaviour Research: The Leading Edge, pp. 17-64 (Amsterdam/New York: Pergamon).
46. McFadden, D. L. (2003) Development of theory and methods for analyzing discrete choice, in: T. Persson (Ed) Nobel Lectures in Economic Sciences, 1996-2000, pp. 330-365 (Singapore: World Scientific).
47. Nguyen, S. and Pallottino, S. (1988) Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 37(2), pp. 176-186.
48. Nguyen, S., Pallottino, S. and Malucelli, F. (2001) A modeling framework for passenger assignment on a transport network with timetables. Transportation Science, 35(3), pp. 238-249.
49. Nielsen, O. A. (2000) A stochastic transit assignment model considering differences in passengers utility functions. Transportation Research, 34B(5), pp. 377-402.
50. Nielsen, O. A. and Frederiksen, R. D. (2006) Optimisation of timetable-based, stochastic transit assignment models based on MSA. Annals of Operations Research, 144, pp. 263-285.
51. Nielsen, O. A. and Jovicic, G. (1999) A large scale stochastic timetable-based transit assignment model for route and sub-mode choices, in: Proceedings of 27th European Transportation Forum, Seminar F, September, pp. 169-184 (Cambridge: ETC).
52. Nökel, K and Wekeck, S (2009) Boarding and alighting in frequency-based transit assignment. Paper presented at the 88th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC, January.
53. Nuzzolo, A. and Coppola, P. (2002) Real-time information to public transportation users: why, what, how? in: D. Wang and S.-M. Li (Eds) Proceedings of the 7th Conference of Hong Kong Society for Trasnportation Studies, pp. 45-58 (Hong Kong: Department of Geology, Hong Kong Baptist University).
54. Nuzzolo, A. and Crisalli, U. (2004) The schedule-based approach in dynamic transit modeling: a general review, in: A. Nuzzolo and N. H. M. Wilson (Ed) Schedule-Based Dynamic Transit Modeling: Theory and Applications, pp. 1-22 (Boston, MA: Kluwer).
55. Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F. and Crisalli, U. (2001) A doubly dynamic schedule-based assignment model for transit networks. Transportation Science, 35(3), pp. 268-285.
56. Poon, M. H., Wong, S. C. and Tong, C. O. (2004) A dynamic schedule-based model for congested transit networks. Transportation Research, 38B(4), pp. 343-368.
57. Pursula, M. and Weurlander, M. (1999) Modeling level-of-service factors in public transportation route choice. Transportation Research Record, 1669, pp. 30-37.
58. Ren, H., Gao, Z., Lam, W. H. K. and Long, J. (2009) Assessing the benefits of integrated en-route transit information systems and time-varying transit pricing systems in a congested transit network. Transportation Planning and Technology, 32(3), pp. 215-237.
59. Schmöcker, J.-D., Bell, M. G. H. and Kurauchi, F. (2008) A quasi-dynamic capacity constrained frequency-based transit assignment model. Transportation Research, 42B(10), pp. 925-945.
60. Schmöcker, J.-D., Bell, M. G. H., Kurauchi, F. and Shimamoto, H. (2009) A game theoretic approach to the determination of hyperpaths in transportation networks, in: W. H. K. Lam, S. C. Wong and H. K. Lo (Eds) Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee, pp. 1-18 (Boston, MA: Springer).
61. Shimamoto, H., Kurauchi, F. and Iida, Y. (2005) Evaluation on effect of arrival time information provision using transit assignment model. International Journal of ITS Research, 3(1), pp. 11-18.
62. Simon, H. A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, pp. 99-118.
63. Slavin, H., Rabinowicz, A., Brandon, J., Flammia, G. and Freimer, R. (2009) Using automated fare collection data, GIS and dynamic schedule queries to improve transit data and transit assignment models, in: N. H. M. Wilson and A. Nuzzolo (Eds) Schedule-Based Modelling of Transportation Networks: Theory and Applications, pp. 101-118 (New York: Springer).
64. Spiess, H. (1984) Contributions a la Theorie et aux Outils de Planification Des Reseaux de Transport Urbain [Contributions to the theory and planning tools for urban transit system]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universite de Montreal, Montreal.
65. Spiess, H. and Florian, M. (1989) Optimal strategies: a new assignment model for transit networks. Transportation Research, 23B(2), pp. 83-102.
66. Teklu, F., Watling, D. and Connors, R. (2007) A markov process model for capacity constrained transit assignment, in: R. E. Allsop, M. G. H. Bell and B. G. Heydecker (Eds) Transportation and Traffic Theory 2007: Papers Selected for Presentation at ISTTT17, chap. 21, pp. 483-505 (Amsterdam/Boston, MA: Elsevier).
67. Tian, Q., Huang, H.-J. and Yang, H. (2007) Equilibrium properties of the morning peak-period commuting in a many-to-one mass transit system. Transportation Research, 41B(6), pp. 616-631.
68. Tong, C. O. and Richardson, A. J. (1984) A computer model for finding the time-dependent minimum path in a transit system with fixed schedules. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 18, pp. 145-161
69. Tong, C. O. and Wong, S. C. (1999) A stochastic transit assignment model using a dynamic schedule-based network. Transportation Research, 33B(2), pp. 107-121.
70. Turnquist, M. A. (1978) A model for investigation the effects of service frequency and reliability in bus passenger waiting times. Transportation Research Record, 663, pp. 70-73.
71. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992) Advances in Prospect Theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), pp. 297-323.
72. van der Ward, J. (1988) The relative importance of public transport trip-time attributes in route choice. Paper presented at the PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, Bath, June.
73. Wahba, M. and Shalaby, A. (2009) MILATRAS: A new modeling framework for the transit assignment problem, in: N. H. M. Wilson and A. Nuzzolo (Eds) Schedule-Based Modeling of Transportation Networks: Theory and Applications, pp. 171-194 (New York: Springer).
74. Wardrop, J. G. (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Institution of Civil Engineers- Proceedings, 1(2), pp. 325-362
75. Wilson, N. H. M., Zhao, J. and Rahbee, A. (2009) The potential impact of automated data collection systems on urban public transport planning, in: N. H. M. Wilson and A. Nuzzolo (Eds) Schedule- Based Modeling of Transportation Networks: Theory and Applications, pp. 75-99 (New York: Springer).
76. Wu, J. H., Florian, M. and Marcotte, P. (1994) Transit equilibrium assignment: a model and solution algorithms. Transportation Science, 28(3), pp. 193-203.
77. Yang, L. and Lam, W. H. K. (2006) Probit-type reliability-based transit network assignment. Transportation Research Record, 1977, pp. 154-163.
78. Zhao, J. (2004) The planning and analysis implications of automated data collection systems: rail transit OD matrix inference and path choice modelling examples. Unpublished master's dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.