The use of a reference tissue arterial input function with low-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI data

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 4871-4883

  Heisen, M ^a   Fan, X ^b   Buurman, J ^c   Van Riel, N A W ^a   Karczmar, G S ^b   Ter Haar Romeny, B M ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CANCER TRANSPLANTATION; DISEASE MODEL; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTATE TUMOR; RAT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEOPLASM TRANSPLANTATION; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RATS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78149295155     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/016     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Fan X, Haney C R, Mustafi D, Zamora M, Markiewicz E J and Karczmar G S 2010 Use of a reference tissue and blood vessel to measure the arterial input function in DCEMRI Magn. Reson. Med. at press
2. Fan X and Karczmar G S 2009 A new approach to analysis of the impulse response function (IRF) in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCEMRI): a simulation study Magn. Reson. Med. 62 229-39
3. Fan X, Medved M, River J N, Zamora M, Corot C, Robert P, Bourrinet P, Lipton M, Culp R M and Karczmar G S 2004 New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors Magn. Reson. Med. 51 487-94
4. Faranesh A Z and Yankeelov T E 2008 Incorporating a vascular term into a reference region model for the analysis of DCE-MRI data: a simulation study Phys. Med. Biol. 53 2617-31
5. Heisen M, Fan X, Buurman J, van Riel N A, Karczmar G S and ter Haar Romeny B M 2010 The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data Magn. Reson. Med. 63 811-6
6. Henderson E, Rutt B K and Lee T Y 1998 Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease Magn. Reson. Imaging 16 1057-73
7. Huisman H J, Veltman J, Karssemeijer N, Boetes C, Blickman J G and Barentsz J O 2006 Computer-aided diagnosis of breast MRI using pharmacokinetic modeling Proc. RSNA 2006 SSC17-09
8. Kovar D A, Lewis M and Karczmar G S 1998 A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 8 1126-34
9. Laue H O, Althaus M, Behrens S, Hahn H K and Peitgen H-O 2007 Dependency of parameter estimates for the Tofts model on temporal sampling rate and on bolus arrival time Proc. ISMRM 2007 p 1722
10. Li J, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Bao S, Wu C, Wang X, Li J, Zhang X and Hu J 2009 A clinically feasible method to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters in breast cancer Med. Phys. 36 3786-94
11. Medved M, Karczmar G, Yang C, Dignam J, Gajewski T F, Kindler H, Vokes E, MacEneany P, Mitchell M T and Stadler W M 2004 Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: variability and changes in tumor tissue over time J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 20 122-8
12. Padhani A R, Hayes C, Landau S and Leach M O 2002 Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues NMR Biomed. 15 143-53
13. Parker G J, Roberts C, Macdonald A, Buonaccorsi G A, Cheung S, Buckley D L, Jackson A, Watson Y, Davies K and Jayson G C 2006 Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporalresolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 56 993-1000
14. Planey C R et al 2009 Temporal sampling requirements for reference region modeling of DCE-MRI data in human breast cancer J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30 121-34
15. Press W H, Teukolsky S A, Vetterling W T and Flannery B P 1996 Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
16. Tofts PS et al 1999 Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T (1)-weighted MRI ofa diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10 223-32
17. Vos P C, Hambrock T, Barentsz J O and Huisman H J 2009 Automated calibration for computerized analysis of prostate lesions using pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance images Proc. MICCAI 2009 5761 836-43
18. Walker-Samuel S, Parker C C, Leach M O and Collins D J 2007 Reproducibility of reference tissue quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced data: comparison with a fixed vascular input function Phys. Med. Biol. 52 75-89
19. Yang C, Karczmar G S, Medved M, Oto A, Zamora M and Stadler W M 2009 Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI analysis Magn. Reson. Med. 61 851-9
20. Yang C, Karczmar G S, Medved M and Stadler W M 2007 Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation Magn. Reson. Med. 58 1266-75
21. Yang C, Stadler W M, Karczmar G S, Milosevic M, Yeung I and Haider M A 2010 Comparison of quantitative parameters in cervix cancer measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT Magn. Reson. Med. 63 1601-9
22. Yankeelov T E, Cron G O, Addison C L, Wallace J C, Wilkins R C, Pappas B A, Santyr G E and Gore J C 2007 Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE-MRI data Magn. Reson. Med. 57 353-61
23. Yankeelov T E, De Busk L M, Billheimer D D, Luci J J, Lin P C, Price R R and Gore J C 2006 Repeatability of a reference region model for analysis of murine DCE-MRI data at 7T J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 24 1140-7
24. Yankeelov T E, Luci J J, Lepage M, Li R, Debusk L, Lin P C, Price R R and Gore J C 2005 Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model Magn. Reson. Imaging 23 519-29