Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitatiye dynamic contrast enhanced-mri analysis

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 851-859

  Yang, Cheng ^a,b   Karezmar, Gregory S ^a   Medved, Milica ^a   Oto, Aytekin ^a   Zamora, Marta ^a   Stadier, Walter M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Section Hematology/Oncology   (United States)

Author keywords

Arterial input function; Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI; Reference tissue; Reproducibility; Tracer kinetic modeling

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; KINETIC PARAMETERS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; TISSUE; UROLOGY;

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRIS (DCE); MULTIPLE REFERENCES; PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL; REPRODUCIBILITIES; SUM OF SQUARED ERRORS; TRACER KINETIC MODELING;

TISSUE ENGINEERING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; TRACER;

ADVANCED CANCER; ARTICLE; BONE METASTASIS; CANCER PATIENT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; KINETICS; METASTASIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTATE CANCER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 66249090834     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21912     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Padhani AR. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology; current status and future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16: 407-422.
2. Morgan B. Thomas A. L. Drevs J. Hennig J. Buchert M. Jivan A. Horsfield M. A. Mross K. Ball H. A. Lee L. Mietlowski W. Fuxuis S. Unger C. O'Byrne K. Henry A. Cherryman G. R. Laurent D. Dugan M. Marme D. Steward WP. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for the pharmacological response of PTK787/ZK 222584, an inhtbitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and liver metastases: results from two phase T studies. J Clin Oncol 2003;21: 3955-3984.
3. 3.,. Liu G. Rugo H. S. Wilding G. McShane T. M. Evelhoch J. L. Ng C. Jackson E. Kelcz F. Yeh B. M. Lee F. T. Jr. Charnsangavej C. Park J. W. Ashton E. A. Steinfeldt HM,. Pithavala Y. K. Reich S. D. Herhst RS. Dynamic contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a pharmacodynamic measure of response after acute dosing of AG-013736, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I study. J Clin Oncol 2005:23:5464-5473.
4. Tofts P. S. Brix G. Buckley D. L. Evelhoch J. L. Henderson E. Knopp M. V. Larsson H. B. Lee T. Y. Mayr N. A. Parker G. J. Port R. E. Taylor J. Weisskoff RM. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T (1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:223-232.
5. Leach M. O. Brindle K. M. Evelhoch J. L. Griffiths J. R. Horsman M. R. Jackson A. Jayson G. C. Judson I. R. Knopp M. V. Maxwell R. J. Mclntyre D. Padliani A. R. Price P. Rathbone R. Rustin GJ. Tofts P. S. Tozer G. M. Vennart W. Waterton J. C. Williams S. R. Workman P. The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations. Br J Cancer 2005;92:1599-1610.
6. Wendland M. F. Saeed M. Yu K. K. Roberts T. P. Lauerma K. Derugin N. Varadarajan J. Watson A. D. Higgins CB. Inversion recovery EPI of bolus transit in rat myocardium using intravascular and extra vascular gadolinium-based MR contrast media: dose effects on peak signal enhancement. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:319-329
7. Chen JJ. Smith M. R. Frayne R. The impact of partial-volume effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;4122:390-399.
8. Ivancevic M. K. Zimine I. Foxall D. Lecoq G. Righettl A. Didler D. Vallee JP. Inflow effect In first-pass cardiac and renal MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 003;18:372-378.
9. Weinmann H. J. Laniado M. Mutzel W. Pharmacokinetics of GdDTPA/dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers. Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR 1984;16:187-172.
10. Tofts P. S. Kerrnode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR Imaging. 1, Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991:17:357-387
11. Parker G. J. Roberts C. Macdonald A. Buonaccorsi G. A. Cheung S. Buckley D. L. Jackson A. Watson Y. Davies K. Jayson GC. Experimentallyderived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2008:58:993-1000.
12. Port R. E. Knopp M. V. Brix G. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using Gd-DTPA: interindividual variability of the arterial Input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:1030-1038.
13. Kovar D. A. Lewis M. Karczrnar GS. A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues. 31J Magn Reson Imaging 1998:8:1126-1134.
14. Padliani A. R. Hayes C. Landau S. Leach MO. Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues. NMR Biomed 2002;15: 143-153.
15. Walker-Samuel S. Parker C. C. Leach M. O. Collins DJ. Reproducibility of reference tissue quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced data: comparison with a fixed vascular input function. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52:75-89.
16. Yang C. Karczrnar G. S. Medved M. Stadler W. M. Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies: fundamental concepts and simulations. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:1110-1117
17. Yankeelov T. E. Luci J. J. Lepage M. Li R. Debusk L. Lin P. C. Price R. R. Gore JC. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging 12005;23:519-529.
18. Yankeelov T. E. Luci J. J. DeBusk L. M. Lin P. C. Gore JC. Incorporating the effects of transcytolemmal water exchange in a reference region model for DCE-MRI analysis: theory, simulations, and experimental results. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:326-335.
19. Yang C. Karczrnar G. S. Medved M. Stadler WM. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1266-1275.
20. Rlabkov D. Y. DI Bella EV. Estimation of kinetic parameters without input functions: analysis of three methods for multichannel blind identification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002;49:1318-1327.
21. Riabkov D. Y. Di Bella EV. Blind identification of the kinetic parameters in three-compartment models. Phys Med Biol 2004:49:639-664.
22. Port R. E. Knopp M. V. Hoffmann U. Milker-Zabel S. Brix G. Multicompartment analysis of gadolinium chelate kinetics: blood-tissue exchange in mammary tumors as monitored by dynamic MR Imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:233-241.
23. Medved M. Karczmar G. Yang C. Dignam J. Gajewski T. F. Kindler H. Yokes E. MacEneany P. Mitchell M. T. Stadler W. M. Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MKI in cancer patients; variability and changes in tumor tissue over time. J Magn Reson imaging 2004;20:122-128.
24. Bydder G. M. Hajnal J. V. Young IR. Use of the inversion recovery pulse sequence. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG, editors. Magnetic resonance imaging. St. Louis: William G. Mosby; 11999. p 6169-86.
25. Wong K. P. Feng DG. Meikle S. R. Fulham MJ. Segmentation of dynamic PET images using cluster analysis. IEEE T Nucl Sci 2002;49;200-207
26. Donahue K. M. Weisskoff R. M. Parmelee D. J. Callahan R. J. Wilkinson RA. Mandeville J. B. Rosen BR. Dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI measurement of tissue cell volume fraction. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34:423-432.
27. Yankeelov T. E. Cron G. O. Addison C. L. Wallace JG,. Wilkins R. C. Pappas B. A. Santyr G. E. Gore JC. Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE-MRT data. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:353-381.
28. Thompson H. K. Jr. Starmer C. F. Whalen R. E. Mcintosh HD. Indicator transit time considered as a gamma variate. Giro Res 1964:14:502-515.
29. Hamilton VVF, Riley K. L. Attyah A. M. Cournand A. Fowell D. M. Himmelstein A. Noble R. P. Remington J. W. Richards D. W. Wheeler NC, Whitham AG. Comparison of the Fick and Dye indicator methods of measuring cardiac output in man. Am J Physiol 1948;153:309.
30. Garrett J. S. Lanzer P. Jaschke W. Botvinick E. Sievers R. Higgins C. B. Lipton MJ. Measurement of cardiac output by cine computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 1985;56:657-661.
31. Li K. L. Zhu X. P. Waterton J. Jackson A. Improved 3D quantitative mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability in brain tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:347-357.
32. Fritz-Hansen T. Rostrup E. Larsson FIB, Sondergaard L. Ring P. Henriksen O. Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: a step toward quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:225-223.
33. Montani J. P. Mizelle H. L. Van Vliet B. N. Adair TH. Advantages of continuous measurement of cardiac output 24 h a day. Am J Physiol 1995;289 (Pt 2):H696-H703.
34. Yankeelov T. E. Rooney W. D. LI X. Springer C. S. Jr. Variation of the relaxographic "shutter-speed" for transcytolernmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape. Magn Reson Med 2003;50: 1151-1169.
35. Li X. Rooney W. D. Springer C. S. Jr. A unified magnetic resonance imaging pharmacokinetic theory: Intravascular and extracellular contrast reagents. Magn Reson Med 2005:54:1851-1359.
36. Parker G. J. Barker G. J. Tofts PS. Accurate multislice gradient echo T (1) measurement in the presence of non-ideal RF pulse shape and RF field nonunlforrnity. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:838-845.
37. Calamante F. Gadian D. G. Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:488-473.
38. Wade O. L. Bishop JM. Cardiac output and regional blood flow. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 1982. p 88-95.
39. Krejcle T. G. Hen thorn T. K. Niemann G. U. Klein C. Gupta D. K. Gentry WB, Shanks C. A. Avram MJ. Recirculatory pharmacokinetic models of markers of blood, extracellular fluid and total body water administered concomitantly. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996:278:1050-1057.
40. Yang G. Stadler W. M. Medved M. Karczmar GS. Tumor Arterial Input Function (AIF) estimation in DCE-MRI studies using a multiple reference tissue method. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2006. p 384.