Automated calibration for computerized analysis of prostate lesions using pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance images

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5762 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2009, Pages 836-843

  Vos, Pieter C ^a   Hambrock, Thomas ^a   Barenstz, Jelle O ^a   Huisman, Henkjan J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; AUTOMATED CALIBRATION; AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION; AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION METHOD; BENIGN LESION; BLOB DETECTION; CALIBRATION METHOD; COMPUTERIZED ANALYSIS; CONTEXT-BASED SEGMENTATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; FEATURE SETS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGES; MANUAL ANNOTATION; MANUAL SEGMENTATION; MR IMAGES; NORMAL TISSUE; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; PLASMA PROFILES; PROSTATE CANCERS; THRESHOLD SELECTION;

ABERRATIONS; AUTOMATION; CALIBRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL COMPUTING; PHARMACOKINETICS; RESONANCE;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NETHERLANDS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79551685469     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04271-3_101     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Vos, P., Hambrock, T., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, C., Fütterer, J., Barentsz, J., Huisman, H.: Computerized analysis of prostate lesions in the peripheral zone using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Med. Phys. 35(3), 888-899 (2008)
2. Hricak, H., Choyke, P., Eberhardt, S., Leibel, S., Scardino, P.: Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology 243(1), 28-53 (2007) (Pubitemid 46579693)
3. Fütterer, J., Heijmink, S., Scheenen, T., Veltman, J., Huisman, H., Vos, P., de Kaa, C., Witjes, J., Krabbe, P., Heerschap, A., Barentsz, J.: Prostate Cancer Localization with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging. Radiology 241(2), 449-458 (2006) (Pubitemid 44332665)
4. Chan, I.,Wells,W., Mulkern, R., Haker, S., Zhang, J., Zou, K., Maier, S., Tempany, C.: Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. Med. Phys. 30(9), 2390-2398 (2003)
5. Weinmann, H.J., Laniado, M., Mutzel, W.: Pharmacokinetics of GdDTPA/ dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers. Physiol. Chem. Phys. Med. NMR 16(2), 167-172 (1984)
6. Brix, G., Semmler, W., Port, R., Schad, L.R., Layer, G., Lorenz, W.J.: Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 15(4), 621-628 (1991)
7. Huisman, H., Veltman, J., Boetes, C., Karssemeijer, N., Blickman, H., Barentsz, J.: Computer-aided diagnosis of breast MRI using pharmacokinetic modeling. RSNA, SSC17-09 (2006)
8. Vos, P.C., Hambrock, T., Fütterer, J.J., van de Kaa, C.A.H., Barentsz, J., Huisman, H.H.: Effect of calibration on computerized analysis of prostate lesions using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. In: SPIE, vol. 6514, 65140U (2007) (Pubitemid 47567552)
9. Tofts, P., Brix, G., Buckley, D., Evelhoch, J., Henderson, E., Knopp, M., Larsson, H., Lee, T., Mayr, N., Parker, G., Port, R., Taylor, J., Weisskoff, R.: Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10(3), 223-232 (1999)
10. Kovar, D., Lewis, M., Karczmar, G.: A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 8(5), 1126-1134 (1998)
11. Otsu, N.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. EEE Trans. Sys., Man., Cyber. 9(1), 62-66 (1979)
12. Frangi, A.F., Niessen, W.J., Vincken, K.L., Viergever, M.A.: Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. In:Wells,W.M., Colchester, A.C.F., Delp, S.L. (eds.) MICCAI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1496, p. 130. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
13. Rutter, C.: Bootstrap estimation of diagnostic accuracy with patient-clustered data. Acad. Radiol. 7(6), 413-419 (2000)
14. Hittmair, K., Gomiscek, G., Langenberger, K., Recht, M., Imhof, H., Kramer, J.: Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 31(5), 567-571 (1994)