MEDICS: Ultra-portable processing for medical image reconstruction

Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques - Conference Proceedings, PACT

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 181-192

  Dasika, Ganesh ^a   Sethia, Ankit ^a   Robby, Vincentius ^a   Mudge, Trevor ^a   Mahlke, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

low power; medical imaging; operation chaining; stacked DRAM; stream processing

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS; GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTERS; GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT; IMAGE ACQUISITION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MEDICAL IMAGING; PARALLEL ARCHITECTURES; PROGRAM PROCESSORS; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

COMPUTATION EFFICIENCY; GENERAL PURPOSE PROCESSORS; HIGH POWER CONSUMPTION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM; LOW POWER; MULTICORE ARCHITECTURES; OPERATION CHAINING; STREAM PROCESSING;

MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 78149253712     PISSN: 1089795X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1854273.1854299     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. E. Asma, D. Shattuck, and R. Leahy. Lossless compression of dynamic PET data. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 50(1):9-16, Feb. 2003.
2. K. Bae and B. Whiting. CT data storage reduction by means of compressing projection data instead of images: Feasibility study. Radiology, 219(3):850-855, June 2001.
3. A. B. de Gonzalez et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(22):2071-2077, 2009.
4. V. Govindaraju et al. Toward a multicore architecture for real-time ray-tracing. In Proc. of the 41st Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 176-197, Dec. 2008.
5. T. Gunnarsson et al. Mobile computerized tomography scanning in the neurosurgery intensive care unit: increase in patient safety and reduction of staff workload. Journal of Neurosurgery, 93(3):432-436, Sept. 2000.
6. A. K. Hara et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: Feasibility study. American Journal of Roentgenology, 193(3):764-771, Sept. 2009.
7. T. D. Hartley et al. Biomedical image analysis on a cooperative cluster of GPUs and multicores. In Proc. of the 2008 International Conference on Supercomputing, pages 15-25, 2008.
8. J. Kelm et al. Rigel: An architecture and scalable programming interface for a 1000-core accelerator. In Proc. of the 36th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 140-151, June 2009.
9. G. H. Loh. 3D-Stacked memory architectures for multi-core processors. In Proc. of the 35th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 453-464, 2008.
10. C. Maass et al. CT image reconstruction with half precision floating point values, 2009.
11. A. Mahesri et al. Tradeoffs in designing accelerator architectures for visual computing. In Proc. of the 41st Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 164-175, Nov. 2008.
12. NVIDIA. GeForce GTX 200 GPU architectural overview, 2008. http://www.nvidia.com/docs/IO/55506/GeForce-GTX-200-GPU-Technical-Brief.pdf.
13. J. Orchard and J. T. Yeow. Toward a flexible and portable CT scanner. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2008, pages 188-195, 2008.
14. M. Papadonikolakis et al. Efficient high-performance ASIC implementation of JPEG-LS encoder. In Proc. of the 2007 Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pages 159-164, Apr. 2007.
15. M. Papadonikolakis et al. Efficient high-performance implementation of JPEG-LS encoder. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 3(4):303-310, Dec. 2008.
16. B. R. Rau. Iterative modulo scheduling: An algorithm for software pipelining loops. In Proc. of the 27th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 63-74, Nov. 1994.
17. M. T. Review. Cheap, Portable MRI, 2006. http://www.technologyreview.com/ computing/17499/?a=f.
18. A. Ruiz, M. Ujaldon, L. Cooper, and K. Huang. Non-rigid registration for large sets of microscopic images on graphics processors. Springer Journal of Signal Processing, May 2008.
19. K. Sankaralingam et al. Exploiting ILP, TLP, and DLP using polymorphism in the TRIPS architecture. In Proc. of the 30th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 422-433, June 2003.
20. A. Savakis and M. Piorun. Benchmarking and hardware implementation of JPEG-LS. In 2002 International Conference on Image Processing, pages 949-952, Sept. 2002.
21. N. Sinha and J. Yeow. Carbon nanotubes for biomedical applications. IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, 4(2):180-195, June 2005.
22. S. S. Stone et al. Accelerating advanced MRI reconstructions on GPUs. In 2008 Symposium on Computing Frontiers, pages 261-272, 2008.
23. M. B. Taylor et al. The Raw microprocessor: A computational fabric for software circuits and general purpose programs. IEEE Micro, 22(2):25-35, 2002.
24. Texas Instruments. CT Scanner: Medical Imaging Solutions from Texas Instruments, 2009. http://focus.ti.com/docs/solution/folders/print/529.html.
25. Tezzaron Semiconductor. FaStack Memory, 2009. http://www.tezzaron.com/ memory/FaStack-memory.html.
26. J.-B. Thibault, K. Sauer, C. Bouman, and J. Hsieh. A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multi-slice helical CT. Medical Physics, 34(11):4526-4544, Nov. 2007.
27. Trenton Systems. Trenton JXT6966 News Release, 2010. http://www. trentontechnology.com/.
28. Trimaran. An infrastructure for research in ILP, 2000. http://www.trimaran.org/.
29. D. Weinreb and J. Stahl. The introduction of a portable head/neck CT scanner may be associated with an 86% increase in the predicted percent of acute stroke patients treatable with thrombolytic therapy, 2008. Radiological Society of North America.
30. M. Woh et al. From SODA to scotch: The evolution of a wireless baseband processor. In Proc. of the 41st Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 152-163, Nov. 2008.
31. T. Yeh et al. ParallAX: an architecture for real-time physics. In Proc. of the 34th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 232-243, June 2007.
32. J. Zhang et al. Stationary scanning x-ray source based on carbon nanotube field emitters. Applied Physics Letters, 86(18):184104, 2005.