Evidence for a role of the responding agent in the joint compatibility effect

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2159-2171

  Philipp, Andrea M ^a,b   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action representation; Agent based compatibility; Joint action; Responding agent; Self other interaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149246826     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470211003802426     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 365-377.
2. Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2010). Sharing tasks with real, imagined, and unintentional co-actors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3. Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action co-representation: The joint SNARC effect. Social Neuroscience, 3, 410-420.
4. Brédart, S., Delchambre, M., & Laureys, S. (2006). One's own face is hard to ignore. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 46-52.
5. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
6. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42.
7. De Houwer, J. (1998). The semantic Simon effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 683-688.
8. De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2001). On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 189-206.
9. De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1998). An affective variant of the Simon paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 45-61.
10. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
11. Gevers, W., Lammertyn, J., Notebaert, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 122, 221-233.
12. Ghyselinck, M., Custers, R., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: Further evidence for the semantic hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 550-554.
13. Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Price, C. J., Josephs, O., Vandenberghe, R., Cappa, S. F., Kapur, N., et al. (1998). The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing. Brain, 121, 2103-2118.
14. Izaute, M., & Bonin, P. (2006). Retrieval of names in face and object naming in an interference study. Memory, 14, 400-414.
15. Jenkins, R., Lavie, N., & Driver, J. (2003). Ignoring famous faces: Category-specific dilution of distractor interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 298-309.
16. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
17. Kunde, W., & Stocker, C. (2002). A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 581-592.
18. Neuner, F., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2000). Neuropsychological impairments in the recognition of faces, voices, and personal names. Brain & Cognition, 44, 342-366.
19. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer.
20. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
21. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88, 11-21.
22. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1234-1246.
23. Sebanz, N., Rebbechi, D., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Frith, C. (2007). Is it really my turn? An eventrelated fMRI study of task sharing. Social Neuroscience, 2, 81-95.
24. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
25. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
26. Tsai, C.-C., & Brass, M. (2007). Does the human motor system simulate Pinocchio's actions? Coacting with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction. Psychological Science, 18, 1058-1062.
27. Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Jing, J.-T., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2006). A common coding framework in self-other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 353-362.
28. Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2007). A Simon effect in memory retrieval: Evidence for the responsediscrimination account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 984-988.
29. Young, A. W., Ellis, A. W., Flude, B. M., McWeeny, K. H., & Hay, D. C. (1986). Face-name interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 466-475.