Does the human motor system simulate Pinocchio's actions? Coacting with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction

Psychological Science

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1058-1062

  Tsai, Chia Chin ^a   Brass, Marcel ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STATISTICS; VISION;

ADULT; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 36348998815     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02025.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brass, M., Bekkering, H. Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologia, 106, 3 22.
2. Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A. Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44, 124 143.
3. Brass, M. Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the corresponding problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 489 495.
4. De Jong, R., Liang, C.C. Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731 750.
5. Kilner, J.M., Paulignan, Y. Blakemore, S.J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, 522 525.
6. Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R. Heyes, C. (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 632 640.
7. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129 154.
8. Ramnani, N. Miall, R.C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 85 90.
9. Rizzolatti, G. Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169 192.
10. Schubotz, R.I. von Cramon, D.Y. (2003). Functional-anatomical concepts of human premotor cortex: Evidence from fMRI and PET studies. NeuroImage, 20, 120 131.
11. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H. Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70 76.
12. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G. Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88, B11 B21.
13. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Stumpf, L. Prinz, W. (2005). Far from action blind: Action representation in individuals with autism. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 433 454.
14. Tai, Y.F., Scherfler, C., Brooks, D.J., Sawamoto, N. Castiello, U. (2004). The human premotor cortex is "mirror" only for biological actions. Current Biology, 14, 117 120.
15. Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.J., Hung, D.L. Tzeng, J.L. (2006). The power of biological agent: Co-acting with a man versus a computer in an interactive context. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16. Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.J., Jing, J.T., Hung, D.L. Tzeng, O.J.L. (2006). The common coding framework in self-other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 353 362.