Listening to humans walking together activates the social brain circuitry

Social Neuroscience

Volumn 3, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 410-420

  Atmaca, Silke ^a   Sebanz, Natalie ^b   Prinz, Wolfgang ^c   Knoblich, Gunther ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CELL COMMUNICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PERCEPTION; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SPATIAL SUMMATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN RELATION; IMITATION; MATHEMATICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 56349141151     PISSN: 17470919     EISSN: 17470927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470910801900908     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Arbib, M. A. (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, pp. 105-124.
2. Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N. and Knoblich, G. (2006) Co-representation of arbitrary S-R mappings: The joint flanker effect. Manuscript submitted for publication
3. Barresi, J. and Moore, C. (1996) Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 19, pp. 107-154.
4. Brass, M., Bekkering, H. and Prinz, W. (2001) Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106, pp. 3-22.
5. Burle, B., Possami, C. -A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M. and Hasbroucq, T. (2002) Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, pp. 324-336.
6. Clark, H. H. (1996) Using language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
7. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M. and Provost, J. (1993) PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, Computers, 25, pp. 257-271.
8. Decety, J. and Grezes, J. (2006) The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behaviour. Cognitive Brain Research, 1079, pp. 4-14.
9. Dehaene, S. (1997) The number sense-How the mind creates mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford
10. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S. and Giraux, P. (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, pp. 371-396.
11. Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. and Rizzolatti, G. (1992) Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, pp. 176-180.
12. Erlhagen, W., Mukovskiy, A. and Bicho, E. (2006) A dynamic model for action understanding and goal-directed imitation. Brain Research, 1083, pp. 174-188.
13. Fias, W. (2001) Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Psychological Research, 65, pp. 250-259.
14. Galantucci, B. (2005) An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29, pp. 737-767.
15. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A. and Turvey, M. T. (2006) The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, pp. 361-377.
16. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. and Rizzolatti, G. (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, pp. 593-609.
17. Gallese, V., Keysers, C. and Rizzolatti, G. (2004) A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, pp. 396-403.
18. Garrod, S. and Pickering, M. (2004) Why is conversation so easy?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, pp. 8-11.
19. Goldman, A. and Sripada, C. S. (2005) Simulationist models of face-based emotion recognition. Cognition, 94, pp. 103-213.
20. Greenwald, A. G. (1970) Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, pp. 73-99.
21. Grezes, J., Armony, J. L., Rowe, J. and Passingham, R. E. (2003) Activations related to "mirror" and "canonical" neurones in the human brain: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 18, pp. 928-937.
22. Hommel, B. (1996) S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, pp. 546-571.
23. Hommel, B., Muesseler, J., Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, pp. 849-937.
24. Iversen, W., Nuerk, H. C. and Willmes, K. (2000) Do signers think differently? The processing of number parity in deaf participants. Cortex, 40, pp. 176-178.
25. James, W. The principles of psychology, 2, Holt, New York
26. Jeannerod, M. (1999) The 25th Bartlett Lecture: To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, pp. 1-29.
27. Keysers, C., Wicker, B., Gazzola, V., Anton, J., Fogassi, L. and Gallese, V. (2004) A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron, 42, pp. 335-346.
28. Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y. and Blakemore, S. J. (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, pp. 522-525.
29. Kilner, J., Vargas, C., Duval, S., Blakemore, S. -J. and Sirigu, A. (2004) Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nature Neuroscience, 7, pp. 1299-1301.
30. Knoblich, G. and Jordan, S. (2002) The mirror system and joint action. Mirror neurons and the evolution of brain and language, pp. 115-124. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
31. Knoblich, G. and Jordan, S. (2003) Action coordination in individuals and groups: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 29, pp. 1006-1016.
32. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. and Osman, A. (1990) Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, pp. 253-270.
33. Lakoff, G. and Nunez, R. E. (2000) Where mathematics comes from, Basic Books, New York
34. Liberman, A. M. and Whalen, D. H. (2000) On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 187-196.
35. Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E. and Umilta, C. (2003) The SNARC effect: An instance of the Simon effect?. Cognition, 88, pp. B1-B10.
36. Nuerk, H. C., Wood, G. and Willmes, K. (2005) The universal SNARC effect: The association between number magnitude and space is amodal. Experimental Psychology, 52, pp. 187-194.
37. Pacherie, E. and Dokic, J. (2006) From mirror neurons to joint actions. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, pp. 101-112.
38. Prinz, W. (1997) Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, pp. 129-154.
39. Rizzolatti, G. and Arbib, M. A. (1998) Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, pp. 188-194.
40. Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, pp. 169-192.
41. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H. and Knoblich, G. (2006) Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, pp. 70-76.
42. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G. and Prinz, W. (2003) Representing others' actions: Just like one's own?. Cognition, 88, pp. B11-B21.
43. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G. and Prinz, W. (2005) How to share a task: Corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, pp. 1234-1246.
44. Sebanz, N., Rebbechi, D., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W. and Frith, C. (2007) Is it really my turn? An event-related fMRI study of task sharing. Social Neuroscience, 2, pp. 81-95.
45. Simon, J. R. (1990) The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. Advances in Psychology, 65, pp. 31-86.
46. Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V. and Craft, J. L. (1970) Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, pp. 97-102.
47. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J. and Frith, C. D. (2004) Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, pp. 1157-1162.
48. Stuermer, B., Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. (2000) Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, pp. 1746-1759.
49. Tomasello, M. (2000) Culture and cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, pp. 37-40.
50. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. and Moll, H. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, pp. 675-735.
51. Tsai, C. -C., Kuo, W. -J., Hung, D. and Tzeng, O. Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. Journals of Cognitive Neuroscience
52. Tsai, C., Kuo, W., Jing, J., Hung, D. and Tzeng, O. (2006) A common coding framework in self-other interaction. Evidence from a joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, pp. 353-362.
53. Wilson, M. and Knoblich, G. (2005) The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, pp. 460-473.
54. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K. and Umilta, C. (2002) Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, pp. 138-139.