Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 288-297

  Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel ^a  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Academic discourse; Attitude markers; Certainty markers; Hedges; Interpersonal metadiscourse

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049472755     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abdi Reza Interpersonal metadiscourse as an indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies 2002, 4:139-145.
2. Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel, 2001. Native and non-native writers' use of textual metadiscourse in ELT papers. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Tehran, Tehran.
3. Abdollahzadeh Esmaeel Writers' presence in Persian and English newspaper editorials. Paper resented at the 34th International Systemic Functional Congress 2007.
4. Adams-Smith D.E. Medical discourse: aspects of author's comments. The ESP Journal 1984, 3:25-36.
5. Bazerman Charles Shaping Written Knowledge 1988, The University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin.
6. Cheng Xiaoguang, Steffensen Margaret Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing. Research in the Teaching of English 1996, 30(2):149-181.
7. Clyne Michael The socio-cultural dimension: the dilemma of the German-speaking scholar. Subject-oriented Texts. Language for Special Purposes and Text Theory 1991, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 49-68. H. Shroder (Ed.).
8. Connor Ulla New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly 2002, 36:493-510.
9. Crismore Avon Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act 1989, Peter Lang, New York.
10. Crismore Avon, Vande Kopple William Readers' learning from prose: The effects of hedges. Written Communication 1988, 5:184-202.
11. Crismore Avon, Markannen Raija, Steffensen Margaret Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing. A study of texts written by American and Finnish University students. Written Communication 1993, 10(1):39-71.
12. Crompton Peter Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes 1997, 16:271-287.
13. Dafouz Emma The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: a cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 2008, 40:95-113.
14. Galtung, John, 1979. Deductive thinking and political practice. An essay of the teutonic intellectual style. In Gakung, J. (Ed.), Essays on Methodology Vol. II. Eljer, Copenhagen.
15. Garrett Mary Asian challenge: contemporary perspectives on rhetoric. Prospect Heights 1991, Waveland, IL, pp. 295-306. 2nd ed. S.K. Foss, K.A. Foss, R. Trapp (Eds.).
16. Halliday Michael An Introduction to Functional Grammar 1994, Edward Arnold, London. 2nd ed.
17. Hinkel Eli Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 1997, 27:361-386.
18. Hinkel Eli Second Language Writers' Text. Linguistic and Rhetorical Features 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
19. Hinkel Eli Teaching Academic ESL Writing 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwa.
20. Hofstede Geert Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind 1977, McGraw-Hill, New York.
21. Holmes Janet Expressing doubt and certainty in English. RELC Journal 1982, 3:9-28.
22. Hopkins Andy, Dudley-Evans Tony A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes 1988, 7:113-122.
23. Hyland Ken Hedging in Scientific Research Articles 1998, John Benjamins Pub Co., New York.
24. Hyland Ken Hedgs, boosters, and lexical invisibility: noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness 2000, 9(4):179-219.
25. Hyland Ken Modality in specialized texts. Selected papers of the first CERLIS Conference 2001, 291-310. G. Maurizio, D. Marina (Eds.).
26. Hyland Ken Humble servants of the discipline? Self mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 2001, 20:207-226.
27. Hyland Ken Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second language Writing 2004, 13:133-151.
28. Hyland Ken Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing 2005, Continuum, Oxford.
29. Hyland Ken, Tse Polly Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2004, 13:133-154.
30. Intaraprawat Puangpen Metadiscourse in native English speakers' and ESL students' persuasive essays. Dissertation Abstracts International 1988, 49(7):1720A.
31. Jalilifar Alireza, Alipour Mohammad How explicit instruction makes a difference: metadiscourse markers and EFL learners' reading comprehension skill. Journal of college Reading and Learning 2007, 38(1):35-52.
32. Lakoff Georg Hedging: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers 1972, 8:183-228.
33. Kaplan Robert Contrastive Rhetoric and Second Language Learning: Notes Toward a Theory of Contrastive Rhetoric 1984, Sage, Newbury Park.
34. Kuhn Thomas The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1972, Chicago Press, University of Chicago. 2nd ed.
35. Malinowski Bronislaw The problem of meaning in primitive languages. The Meaning of Meaning 1930, Harcourt Brace and Company, New York, pp. 296-336. C.K. Ogden, I.A. Richards (Eds.).
36. Mao Luming I conclude not: toward a pragmatic account of metadiscourse. Rhetoric Review 1993, 11(2):265-289.
37. Markannen, Raija, Schroder, Harmut, 1988. Hedging and its linguistic realizations in German, English and Finnish philosophical texts: a case study. Erikoiskieletja Kiiiiniisteoria. VAAKI Seminarii, VII., Finland, Vaasa.
38. Masoumi Davoud, Lindstrom Berner Foundations of cultural design in e-learning. International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management 2009, 6(2):124-142.
39. Mauranen Anna Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric 1993, Peter Lang, Frankfort and Main.
40. Myers Greg The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 1989, 10:1-35.
41. Myers Greg Words in Ads 1994, Edward Arnold, London.
42. Olson Leslie, Huckin Thomas N. Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes 1990, 9:33-47.
43. Oliver Robert Communication and Culture in Ancient India and China 1971, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse.
44. Prince Ellen, Frader Joel, Bosk Charles On hedging in physician-physician discourse. Linguistics and the Professions 1982, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Nor-wood, NJ, pp. 83-97. J. di Prieto (Ed.).
45. Salager-Meyer Francois Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 1994, 3:49-170.
46. Salager-Meyer Francoise Language is not a physical object. English for Specific Purposes 1998, 17:295-302.
47. Scollon Ron, Scollon Susanne Intercultural Communication 1995, Blackwell, Oxford.
48. Steffensen Margaret Reading and the reading-writing connection: effects of reading about metadiscourse on writing quality. Paper Presented at the Annual Research Workshop of the Language Center for Finnish Universities 1992.
49. Swales John Genre Analysis: English for Specific Purposes in Academic and Research Setting 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
50. Swales John, Feak Christine Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills 2004, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
51. Vande Kopple William Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 1985, 36:82-96.
52. Vande Kopple William Metadiscourse, discourse, issues in composition and rhetoric. Discourse Studies in Composition 2002, Hampton Press Inc., Cresskill, NJ, pp. 91-144. E. Barton, G. Stygall (Eds.).
53. Varttala Teppo Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes 1999, 18(2):177-200.
54. Williams Joseph M. Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace 1981, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2nd ed.