Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity

Discourse Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 139-145

  Abdi, Reza ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

genre analysis; interpersonal metadiscourse; linguistic behaviour

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993790727     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/14614456020040020101     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bazzerman, C. (1998) ‘Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions’, in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
2. Bernadette, L. (1994) ‘Current Research in Technical Communication: The Role of Metadiscourse in Persuasion’, Journal of Technical Communication 41(2): 348–55.
3. Bhatia, V.K. (1993) Analyzing Genre: Language Use in a Professional Setting. New York: Longman.
4. Brown, D. (1993) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Bunton, D. (1999) ‘The Use of Higher Level Metatext in PhD Theses’, Journal of English For Specific Purposes 18: S41—S56.
6. Chambliss, M.J. and Garner, R. (1996) ‘Do Adults Change Their Minds after Reading Persuasive Text?’, Journal of Written Communication 13(3): 291–313.
7. Cheng, X. and Steffensen, M.S. (1996) ‘Metadiscourse: A Technique for Improving Student Writing’, Journal of Research in the Teaching of English 30(2).
8. Coe, R.M. (1998) ‘The Rhetoric of Genre in the Process Era — and Beyond’, in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
9. Connor, U. (1996) Contrastive Rhetorics: A Cross-Cultural Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Crismore, A. (1990) ‘Metadiscourse and Discourse Process: Interactions and Issues’, Journal of Discourse Procedures 13(2): 191–205.
11. Crismore, A., Markkanen, R. and Steffensen, M.S. (1993) ‘Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Text Written by American and Finnish University Students’, Journal of Written Communication 10(1): 39–71.
12. Crompton, P. (1997) ‘Hedging in Academic Writing: Some Theoretical Problems’, Journal of English For Specific Purposes 15(4): 271–85.
13. Crompton, P. (1998) ‘Identifying Hedges: Definition or Divination’, Journal of English for Specific Purposes 17(3): 303–11.
14. Dudley-Evans, T. (1994) ‘Genre Analysis: An Approach to Text Analysis for ESP’, in M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. Newbury: Routledge.
15. Grabe, W. (1987) ‘Contrastive Rhetoric and Text Type Research’, in U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds) Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Texts. Redwood, CA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotics. London: Edward Arnold.
17. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
18. Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. (1987) English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Hyland, K. (1996) ‘Talking to Academy: Forms of Hedging in Science Research Articles’, Journal of Written Communication 13(2): 251–82.
20. Hyland, K. (1998) ‘Exploring Corporate Rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's Letters’, Journal of Business Communication 35(2): 224–45.
21. Hyland, K. (1999) ‘Talking to Students: Metadiscourse in Introductory Coursebooks’, Journal of English for Specific Purposes 18(1): 3–26.
22. Kaplan, R.B. (1966) ‘Cultural Thought Pattern in Intercultural Communication’, Journal of Language Learning 1(1): 1–20.
23. Kaplan, R.B. (1987) ‘Cultural Thought Patterns Revisited’, in U. Connor and R.B. Kaplan (eds) Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Texts. Redwood, CA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Mauranen, A. (1993) Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
25. Miller, C.R. (1998) ‘Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre ’, in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
26. Paltridge, B. (1996) ‘Genre, Text Type, and the Language Learning Classroom’, ELT Journal 50(13): 237–43.
27. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994) ‘Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse’, Journal of English for Specific Purposes 13: 149–79.
28. Salager-Meyer, F. (1998) ‘Language Is Not a Physical Object’, Journal of English for Specific Purposes 17(3): 295–302.
29. Swales, J. (1981) Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.
30. Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English for Specific Purpose in Academic and Research Setting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Vande Kopple, W. (1985) ‘Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse’, College Composition and Communication 36: 82–93.
32. Van Dijk, T., Ting Toomy, S., Smitherman, G. and Troutman, D. (1997) ‘Discourse, Ethnicity, Culture, and Racism’, in Teun A. van Dijk (ed), Discourse as Social Action. London: Sage.
33. Varttala, T. (1999) ‘Remarks on the Communicative Function of Hedging in Popular Scientific and Specialist Research Articles on Medicine’, Journal of English for Specific Purposes 18(2): 177–200.
34. Widdowson, H.G. (1998) ‘Communication and Community: The Pragmatics of ESP’, Journal of English for Specific Purposes 17(1): 3–11.