Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 133-151

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disciplinary interactions; L2 postgraduate; Metadiscourse

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043164610     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barton E. Contrastive and non-contrastive connectives Written Communication 122 1995 219-239
2. Beauvais P. A speech-act theory of metadiscourse Written Communication 61 1989 11-30
3. Becher T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/Open University Press
4. Bunton D. The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses English for Specific Purposes 18 1998 S41-S56
5. Cheng X. Steffensen M. Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing Research in the Teaching of English 302 1996 149-181
6. Council of Biology Editors. (1994). Scientific style and format: The CBE manual for authors, editors, and publishers (6th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. Crismore A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang
8. Crismore A. & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
9. Crismore A. Markkanen R. Steffensen M. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students Written Communication 10 1993 39-71
10. Davis E. & Schmidt D. (1995). Using the biological literature: A practical guide (2nd ed.). New York: Dekker
11. Halliday M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold
12. Hyland K. Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse Journal of Pragmatics 30 1998a 437-455
13. Hyland K. Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter Journal of Business Communication 352 1998b 224-245
14. Hyland K. (2000) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman
15. Hyland K. Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles Written Communication 184 2001a 549-574
16. Hyland K. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles, English English for Specific Purposes 203 2001b 207-226
17. Hyland K. Tse P. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal Applied Linguistics 252 2004 156-177
18. Intaraprawat P. Steffensen M. The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays Journal of Second Language Writing 43 1995 253-272
19. Johns A. (1990). Coherence as a cultural phenomenon: Employing ethographic principles in the academic milieu. In U. Connor & A. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 209-226). Alexandria, VA: TESOL
20. Mauranen A. Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economics texts English for Specific Purposes 12 1993 3-22
21. McMillan V. (1997). Writing papers in the biological sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Bedford Books
22. Schiffrin D. Metatalk: Organisational and evaluative brackets in discourse Sociological Inquiry: Language and Social Interaction 50 1980 199-236
23. Taavitsainen I. (1999). Metadiscursive practices and the evolution of early English medical writing (1375-1550). In J. M. Kirk (Ed.), Corpora Galore: Analyses and techniques in describe English (pp. 191-207). Amsterdam: Rodopi
24. Thompson G. Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader Applied Linguistics 221 2001 58-78
25. Valero-Garces C. Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English Economics texts English for Specific Purposes 54 1996 279-294
26. Vande Kopple W. (2002). Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric. In F. Bar-ton & C. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition (pp. 91-113). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press