Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 149-181

  Cheng, Xiaoguang ^a   Steffensen, Margaret S ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010068062     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beaugrande, R. de, & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. New York: Longman.
2. Bell, A.O. (Ed.). (1984). The diary of Virginia Woolf (Vol. 5; 1936-1941). London: Hogarth Press.
3. Bickerton, D. (1990). Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Cohen, A., Glasman, H., Rosenbaum-Cohen, P.R., Ferrara, J., & Fine, J. (1979). Reading English for specialized purposes: Discourse analysis and the use of student informants. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 551-554.
5. Crismore, A. (1983). Metadiscourse: What it is and how it is used in school and non-school social science texts (Tech. Rep. No. 273). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
6. Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.
7. Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M.S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing. Written Communication, 10, 39-71.
8. Crismore, A., & Vande Kopple, W.J. (1988). Readers' learning from prose: The effects of hedges. Written Communication, 2, 184-202.
9. Crusius, T.W. (1989). Discourse: A critique and synthesis of major theories. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
10. Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory. College Composition and Communication, 35, 155-171.
11. Flower, L. (1979). Writer based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41, 19-37.
12. Freedman, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 222-251.
13. Goshgarian, G. (1990). The contemporary reader. Glenview, IL: Harper Collins.
14. Halliday, M.A.K. (1976). System and function in language. London: Oxford University Press.
15. Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
16. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearing-house on Reading and Communication Skills.
17. Hookstra, G.M. (1990). Social studies: An examination of textbook structure, classroom interaction, and student achievement [CD-ROM], ProQuest File. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International (Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9019174).
18. Intaraprawat, P. (1988). Metadiscourse in native English speakers' and ESL students' persuasive essays. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.
19. Intaraprawat, P., & Steffensen, M.S. (1995). The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 253-272.
20. Kinneavy, J.L. (1971). A Theory of discourse: The aims of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Lautamatti, L. (1978). Observations on the development of the topic in simplified discourse. In V. Kohonen & N.E. Enkvist (Eds.), Text linguistics, cognitive learning and language teaching (pp. 71-104). Turku, Finland: University of Turku.
22. Littlewood, W. (1995, October) Plenary Address. International Symposium on Language Teaching, Beijing, China.
23. Mao, L.R. (1993). I conclude not: Toward a pragmatic account of metadiscourse. Rhetoric Review, 11, 265-289.
24. O'Keefe, K.H. (1989). Informational and attitudinal metadiscourse as glossing: The effects upon comprehension and decision-making in a business setting [CD-ROM], ProQuest File. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International (Dissertation Abstracts Item: 8910445).
25. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
26. Perry, W. (1968). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A schema. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: W. Morrow & Co.
28. Porter, J.E. (1992). Audience and rhetoric. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. Smith, D.E.A. (1984). Medical discourse: Aspects of author's comment. The ESP Journal, 3, 25-36.
30. Steffensen, M.S. (1992, May). Reading and reading-writing connections: Effects of reading about metadiscourse on writing. Paper presented at the Annual Research Workshop of the Language Center for Finnish Universities, University of Jyväskyla, Jyväskylä, Finland.
31. Vande Kopple, W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.
32. Ward, I. (1994). Literacy, ideology, and dialogue: Towards a dialogic pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
33. Williams, J.W. (1981). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
34. Williams, J.M., & Colomb, G.C. (1993). The case for explicit teaching: Why what you don't know won't help you. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 252-264.