The differential effect of lowlands on the phylogeographic pattern of a Mesoamerican montane species (Lepidocolaptes affinis, Aves: Furnariidae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 658-668

  Arbeláez Cortés, Enrique ^a   Nyári, Árpád S ^b   Navarro Sigüenza, Adolfo G ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic diversity; Humid Montane Forest; Isthmus of Tehuantepec; Lepidocolaptes; Nicaraguan Depression; Phylogeography

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIRD; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENETIC VARIATION; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY;

AVES; FURNARIIDAE; LEPIDOCOLAPTES; LEPIDOCOLAPTES AFFINIS;

EID: 78049364715     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Aleixo A. Molecular systematic and the role of the " Varzea" -" Terra Firme" ecotone in the diversification of Xiphorhynchus woodcreepers (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae). Auk 2002, 119:621-640.
2. Aleixo A. Historical diversification of a terra-firme forest bird superspecies: a phylogeographic perspective on the role of different hypotheses of Amazonian diversification. Evolution 2004, 58:1303-1317.
3. Arbogast B.S., Kenagy G.J. Comparative phylogeography as an integrative approach to historical biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 2001, 28:819-825.
4. Avise J.C., Walker D. Pleistocene phylogeographic effects on avian populations and the speciation process. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1998, 265:457-463.
5. Balloux F. The worm in the fruit of the mitochondrial DNA tree. Heredity 2010, 104:419-420.
6. Bangs O., Penard T.E. Some critical notes on birds. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 1919, 63:24-40.
7. Barber B.R., Klicka J. Two pulses of diversification across the Isthmus of Tehuantepec in a montane Mexican bird fauna. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2010, 10.1098/rspb.2010.0343.
8. Barrier E., Velasquillo L., Chávez M., Gaulon R. Neotectonic evolution of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (Southeastern Mexico). Tectonophysics 1998, 287:7-96.
9. Bei A., Lixun Z., Stephen B., Naifa L., Luzhang R., Sen S. Phylogeography of Tibetan snowcock (Tetraogallus tibetanus) in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 50:526-533.
10. Bonaccorso E., Navarro-Sigüenza A.G., Sánchez-González L.A., Peterson A.T., García-Moreno J. Genetic differentiation of the Chlorospingus ophthalmicus complex in Mexico and Central America. J. Avian Biol. 2008, 39:311-321.
11. Bowie R.C.K., Fjeldsa J., Hackett S.J., Crowe T.M. Molecular evolution in space and through time: mtDNA phylogeography of the Olive Sunbird (Nectarinia olivacea/obscura) throughout continental Africa. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 33:56-74.
12. Cabanne G.S., Santos F.R., Miyaki C.Y. Phylogeography of Xiphorhynchus fuscus (Passeriformes, Dendrocolpatidae): vicariance and recent demographic expansion in southern Atlantic forest. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 91:73-84.
13. Cabanne G.S., De Horta F.M., Sari E.H.R., Santos F.R., Miyaki C.Y. Nuclear and mitochondrial phylogeography of the Atlantic forest endemic Xiphorhynchus fuscus (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae): biogeography and systematics implications. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49:760-773.
14. Cadena C.D., Klicka J., Ricklefs R.E. Evolutionary differentiation in the Neotropical montane region: molecular phylogenetics and phylogeography of Buarremon brush-finches (Aves, Emberizidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44:993-1016.
15. Carling M.D., Brumfield R.T. Gene sampling strategies for multi-locus population estimates of genetic diversity θ. PLoS One 2007, 2:e160.
16. Castoe T.A., Daza J.M., Smith E.N., Sasa M.M., Kuch U., Campbell J.A., Chippindale P.T., Parkinson C.L. Comparative phylogeography of pitvipers suggests a consensus of ancient Middle American highland biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36:88-103.
17. Challenger, A., 1998. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México: pasado, presente y futuro. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico, 847pp.
18. Chesser R.T., Banks R.C., Barker F.K., Cicero C., Dunn J.L., Kratter A.W., Lovette I.J., Rasmussen P.C., Remsen J.V., Rising J.D., Stotz D.F., Winker K. Fiftieth supplement to the American ornithologists' union check-list of North American birds. Auk 2009, 126:706-714.
19. Clement M., Posada D., Crandall K.A. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9:1657-1659.
20. Cortés-Ortiz L., Bermingham E., Rico C., Rodríguez-Luna E., Sampaio I., Ruiz-García M. Molecular systematics and biogeography of the Neotropical monkey genus Alouatta. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 26:64-81.
21. Cortés-Rodríguez N., Hernández-Baños B.E., Navarro-Sigüenza A.G., Peterson A.T., García-Moreno J. Phylogeography and population genetics of the Amenthyst-throated Hummingbird (Lampornis amethystinus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 48:1-11.
22. Crawford A.J., Smith E.N. Cenozoic biogeography and evolution in direct-developing frogs of Central America (Leptodactylidae: Eleutherodactylus) as inferred from a phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 35:536-555.
23. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 8. Broadbills to Tapaculos 2003, Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 845pp. J. Del Hoyo, A. Elliot, D.A. Christie (Eds.).
24. Drovetski S.V., Zink R.M., Mode N.A. Patchy distributions belie morphological and genetic homogeneity in rosy-finches. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 50:437-445.
25. Dupanloup I., Schneider S., Excoffier L. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:2571-2581.
26. Eizirik E., Bonatto S.L., Johnson W.E., Crawshaw P.G., Vie J.C., Brousset D.M., O'Brien S.J., Salzano F.M. Phylogeographic patterns and evolution of the mitochondrial DNA control region in two Neotropical cats (Mammalia, Felidae). J. Mol. Evol. 1998, 47:613-624.
27. Excoffier, L., 2006. Arlequin ver. 3.1. An integrated software package for populations genetics data analysis. Computational and molecular population genetics lab. Zoological Institute, University of Berne. Available from: http://cmpg.unibe.ch/software/arlequin3.
28. Felsenstein J. Accuracy of coalescent likelihood estimates: do we need more sites, more sequences, or more loci?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:691-700.
29. Galtier N., Nabholz B., Glémin S., Hust G.D.D. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:4541-4550.
30. García J.T., Suárez F., Garza V., Calero-Riestra M., Hernández J., Pérez-Tris J. Genetic and phenotypic variation among geographically isolated populations of the globally threatened Dupont's lark Chersophilus duponti. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 46:237-251.
31. García-Moreno J., da Silva J.M.C. An interplay between forest and non-forest South American avifaunas suggested by a phylogeny of Lepidocolaptes woodcreepers (Dendrocolaptinae). Stud. Neotrop. Fauna E. 1997, 32:164-173.
32. García-Moreno J., Navarro-Sigüenza A.G., Peterson A.T., Sánchez-González L.A. Genetic variation coincides with geographic structure in the common bush-tanager (Chlorospingus ophthalmicus) complex from Mexico. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 33:186-196.
33. García-Moreno J., Cortés N., García-Deras G.M., Hernández-Baños B.E. Local origin and diversification among Lampornis hummingbirds: a Mesoamerican taxon. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 38:488-498.
34. Goudet, J., 2002. Fstat. Institute of Ecolgy, UNIL, Laussane, Switzerland. Available from: http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm.
35. Graham A. Historical factors and biological diversity in Mexico. Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution 1993, 109-127. Oxford University Press, New York. T.P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, J. Fa (Eds.).
36. Hackett S.J. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of tanagers in the genus Ramphocelus (Aves). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1996, 5:368-382.
37. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41:95-98.
38. Haring E., Gamauf A., Kryukov A. Phylogeographic patterns in widespread corvid birds. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 45:840-862.
39. Harpending H.C. Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. Hum. Biol. 1994, 66:591-600.
40. Hartl D.L., Clark G.C. Principles of Population Genetics 1997, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 542pp.
41. Hilty S., Brown W.L. A Guide to the Birds of Colombia 1986, Princeton University Press, USA.
42. Hourlay F., Libois R., D'Amico F., Sara M., O'Halloran J., Michaux J.R. Evidence of highly complex phylogeographic structure on a specialist river bird species, the dipper (Cinclus cinclus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 49:435-444.
43. Huang Z., Liu N., Luo S., Long J. Phylogeography of rusty-necklaced partridge (Alectoris magna) in northwestern China. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 43:379-385.
44. Huelsenbeck J.P., Larget B., Miller R.E., Ronquist F. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:673-688.
45. Klicka J., Zink R.M. The importance of recent ice ages in speciation: a failed paradigm. Science 1997, 277:1666-1669.
46. Knowles L.L., Maddison W.P. Statistical phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:2623-2635.
47. Kocher T.D., Thomas W.K., Meyer A., Edwards S.V., Pääbo S., Villablanca F.X., Wilson A.C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86:6196-6200.
48. Kuhner M.K. LAMARC 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:768-770.
49. Kuhner, M.K., 2008. Documentation LAMARC - Likelihood Analysis with Metropolis Algorithm using Random Coalescence. Available from: http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/lamarc/lamarc_prog.html.
50. Leaché A.D., Crews S.C., Hickerson M.J. Two waves of diversification in mammals and reptiles of Baja California revealed by hierarchical Bayesian analysis. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3:646-650.
51. León-Paniagua L., Morrone J.J. Do the Oaxacan Highlands represent a natural biotic unit? A cladistic biogeographical test based on vertebrate taxa. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36:1939-1944.
52. León-Paniagua L., Navarro-Sigüenza A.G., Hernández-Baños B.E., Morales J.C. Diversification of the arboreal mice of the genus Habromys (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Neotominae) in the Mesoamerican highlands. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 42:653-664.
53. Librado P., Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1451-1452.
54. Luna I., Almeida L., Villiers L., Lorenzo L. Reconocimiento florístico y consideraciones fitogeográficas del bosque mesófilo de montaña de Teocelo, Veracruz. Bol. Soc. Bot. México 1988, 48:35-63.
55. Manea, V.C., Manea, M., 2006. The origin of modern Chiapan volcanic arc in Southern Mexico inferred from thermal models. GSA Special Paper 412: Natural Hazards in Central America, pp. 27-38.
56. Mantel N.A. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967, 27:209-220.
57. Marks B.D., Hackett S.J., Capparella A.P. Historical relationships among Neotropical lowland forest areas of endemism as determined by mitochondrial DNA sequence variation within the Wedge-billed Woodcreeper (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae: Glyphorynchus spirurus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002, 24:153-167.
58. Morrone J.J., Espinosa-Organista D., Aguilar-Zuñiga C., Llorente-Bousquets J. Preliminary classification of the Mexican biogeographic provinces: a parsimony analysis of endemicity based on plant, insect, and bird taxa. Southwest Nat. 1999, 44:507-544.
59. Nabholz B., Glemin S., Galtier N. The erratic mitochondrial clock: variations of mutation rate, not population size, affect mtDNA diversity across birds and mammals. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:54.
60. Navarro A.G., Peterson A.T., López-Medrano E., Benítez D.H. Species limits in Mesoamerican Aulacorhynchus toucanets. Wilson Bull. 2001, 113:363-372.
61. Navarro-Sigüenza A.G., Peterson A.T., Nyári Á., García-Deras G., García-Moreno J. Phylogeography of the Buarremon brunneinucha Brush-finch complex (Aves, Emberizidae) in Mesoamerica. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 47:21-35.
62. Omland K.E., Baker J.M., Peters J.F. Genetic signatures of intermediate divergence: population history of Old and New World Holarctic ravens (Corvus corax). Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:795-808.
63. Page R.D.M., Holmes E.C. Molecular Evolution: A Phylogenetic Approach 1998, Blackwell Science Ltd., Great Britain, 346pp.
64. Palumbi S.R., Cipriano F., Hare M.P. Predicting nuclear gene coalescence from mitochondrial data: the three-times rule. Evolution 2001, 55:859-868.
65. Panchal M. The automation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:509-510.
66. Panchal M., Beaumont M.A. The automation and evaluation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Evolution 2007, 61:1466-1480.
67. Patten M.A., Smith-Patten B.D. Biogeographical boundaries and Monmonieŕs algorithm: a case study in the northern Neotropics. J. Biogeogr. 2008, 35:407-416.
68. Pavlova A., Zink R.M., Rohwer S. Evolutionary history, population genetics, and gene flow in the common rosefinch (Carpodacus erythrinus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 36:669-681.
69. Pereira S., Baker A. Low number of mitochondrial pseudogenes in the chicken (Gallus gallus) nuclear genome: implications for molecular inference of population history and phylogenetics. BMC Evol. Biol. 2004, 4:17.
70. Pérez-Emán J.L., Mumme R.L., Jabłoński P. Phylogeography and adaptive plumage evolution in Central American subspecies of the slate-throated redstart (Myioborus miniatus). Ornithol. Monogr. 2010, 67:90-102.
71. Peters J.L. Check-list of Birds of the World 1951, vol. 7. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 318p.
72. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:817-818.
73. Posada D., Crandall K.A., Templeton A.R. GeoDis: a program for the cladistic nested analysis of the geographical distribution of genetic haplotypes. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9:487-488.
74. Puebla-Olivares F., Bonaccorso E., Espinosa A., Omland K.E., Llorente-Bousquets J.E., Peterson A.T., Navarro-Sigüenza A.G. Speciation in the Emerald toucanet (Aulacorhynchus prasinus) complex. Auk 2008, 125:39-50.
75. Rogers A.R., Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1992, 9:552-569.
76. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
77. Sánchez-González L.A., Navarro-Sigüenza A.G., Peterson A.T., García-Moreno J. Taxonomy of Chlorospingus ophthalmicus in México and northern Central America. Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club 2007, 127:34-49.
78. Sánchez-González L.A., Morrone J.J., Navarro-Sigüenza A.G. Distributional patterns of the Neotropical humid montane forest avifaunas. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2008, 94:175-194.
79. Skutch, A.F., 1969. Life histories of Central American birds. III. Families Cotingidae, Pipridae, Formicariidae, Furnariidae, Dendrocolaptidae, and Picidae. Pacif. Coast Avif. 35.
80. Slatkin M., Hudson R.R. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics 1991, 129:555-562.
81. Solórzano S., Baker A.J., Oyama K. Conservation priorities for Resplendent Quetzals based on analysis of mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Condor 2004, 106:449-456.
82. Sorenson M.D., Ast J.C., Dimcheff D.E., Yuri T., Mindell D.P. Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1999, 12:105-114.
83. Storfer A., Murphy M.A., Evans J.S., Goldberg C.S., Robinson S., Spear S.F., Dezzani R., Delmelle E., Vierling L., Waits L.P. Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity 2007, 98:128-142.
84. Streicher J.W., Crawford A.J., Edwards C.W. Multilocus molecular phylogenetic analysis of the montane Craugastor podiciferus species complex (Anura: Craugastoridae) in Isthmian Central America. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 53:620-630.
85. Sullivan J., Markert J.A., Kilpatrick C.W. Phyloeography and molecular systematic of the Peromiscus aztecus species group (Rodentia: Muridae) inferred using parsimony and likelihood. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:426-440.
86. Sullivan J., Arellano E., Rogers D.S. Comparative phylogeography of Mesoamerican highland rodents: concerted versus independent response to past climatic fluctuations. Am. Nat. 2000, 155:755-768.
87. Swofford D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (* and others methods). Ver. 4.0 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
88. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1596-1599.
89. Templeton A.R., Routman E., Phillips C. Separating population structure from population history: a cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics 1995, 140:767-782.
90. Toledo V.M. Pleistocene changes of vegetation in tropical Mexico. Biological Diversification in the Tropics 1982, 93-111. Columbia University Press, New York. G.T. Prance (Ed.).
91. Weir J.T. Divergent timing and patterns of species accumulation in lowland and highland Neotropical birds. Evolution 2006, 60:842-855.
92. Weir J.T., Schluter D. Calibrating the avianmolecularclock. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:2321-2328.
93. Zink R.M., Barrowclough G.F. Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:2107-2121.