The phonemic restoration effect reveals pre-N400 effect of supportive sentence context in speech perception

Brain Research

Volumn 1361, Issue , 2010, Pages 54-66

  Groppe, David M ^a   Choi, Marvin ^a   Huang, Tiffany ^a   Schilz, Joseph ^a   Topkins, Ben ^a   Urbach, Thomas P ^a   Kutas, Marta ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

ERP; N400; Phonemic restoration effect; Speech comprehension

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; INFORMATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PHONEMIC RESTORATION EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78049291383     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. T. Baldeweg Repetition effects to sounds: evidence for predictive coding in the auditory system Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 3 2006 93 94
2. E.A. Bates Frontiers of Biology E. Bizzi, P. Calissano, V. Volterra, The Brain of Homo Sapiens 1999 Giovanni Trecanni Rome
3. A. Bendixen, E. Schroger, and I. Winkler I heard that coming: event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system J. Neurosci. 29 26 2009 8447 8451
4. W.D. Berry, and S. Feldman Multiple Regression in Practice 1985 Sage Publications Beverly Hills
5. R.C. Blair, and W. Karniski An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials Psychophysiology 30 5 1993 518 524
6. P. Boersma, and D. Weenink Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/ 2010
7. J. Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd ed 1988 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, New Jersey
8. J.F. Connolly, and N.A. Phillips Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6 3 1994 256 266
9. J.F. Connolly, S.H. Stewart, and N.A. Phillips The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences Brain Lang. 39 2 1990 302 318
10. J.F. Connolly, N.A. Phillips, S.H. Stewart, and W.G. Brake Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences Brain Lang. 43 1 1992 1 18
11. M. Dambacher, R. Kliegl, M. Hofmann, and A.M. Jacobs Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading Brain Res. 1084 1 2006 89 103
12. R.C. D'Arcy, J.F. Connolly, E. Service, C.S. Hawco, and M.E. Houlihan Separating phonological and semantic processing in auditory sentence processing: a high-resolution event-related brain potential study Hum. Brain Mapp. 22 1 2004 40 51
13. K.A. DeLong, T.P. Urbach, and M. Kutas Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity Nat. Neurosci. 8 8 2005 1117 1121
14. A. Delorme, and S. Makeig EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis J. Neurosci. Meth. 134 1 2004 9 21
15. M.T. Diaz, and T.Y. Swaab Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts Brain Res. 1146 2007 85 100
16. J.L. Elman, and J.L. McClelland Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes J. Mem. Lang. 27 2 1988 143 165
17. K.D. Federmeier, and M. Kutas A rose by any other name: long-term memory structure and sentence processing J. Mem. Lang. 41 1999 469 495
18. A.D. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 2 2002 78 84
19. A.D. Friederici, T.C. Gunter, A. Hahne, and K. Mauth The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension NeuroReport 15 1 2004 165 169
20. K. Friston A theory of cortical responses Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 360 1456 2005 815 836
21. D. Genzel, and E. Charniak Entropy rate constancy in text Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Philadelphia 2002 199 206
22. M.H. Giard, A. Fort, Y. Mouchetant-Rostaing, and J. Pernier Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans Front. Biosci. 5 2000 D84 D94
23. P.B. Gough Context, form, and interaction K. Rayner, Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes 1983 Academic Press New York 203 211
24. P.B. Gough, J.A. Alford, and P. Holley-Wilcox Words and contexts O.J.L. Tzeng, H. Singer, Perception of Print: Reading Research in Experimental Psychology 1981 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, New Jersey 85 102
25. F. Grosjean Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm Percept. Psychophys. 28 4 1980 267 283
26. P. Hagoort, and C.M. Brown ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects Neuropsychologia 38 11 2000 1518 1530
27. P. Hagoort, L. Hald, M.C. Bastiaansen, and K.M. Petersson Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension Science 304 5669 2004 438 441
28. C. Hemmelmann, M. Horn, S. Reiterer, B. Schack, T. Susse, and S. Weiss Multivariate tests for the evaluation of high-dimensional EEG data J. Neurosci. Meth. 139 1 2004 111 120
29. T.P. Jung, S. Makeig, C. Humphries, T.W. Lee, M.J. McKeown, and V.J. Iragui Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation Psychophysiology 37 2 2000 163 178
30. M. Kutas, and K.D. Federmeier Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 12 2000 463 470
31. M. Kutas, and S.A. Hillyard Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity Science 207 4427 1980 203 205
32. M. Kutas, and S.A. Hillyard Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association Nature 307 5947 1984 161 163
33. M. Kutas, C.K. Van Petten, and R. Kluender Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994-2005) M.A. Gernsbacher, M. Traxler, Handbook of Psycholinguistics 2nd ed 2006 Elsevier New York 659 724
34. E.F. Lau, C. Phillips, and D. Poeppel A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9 12 2008 920 933
35. T.W. Lee, M. Girolami, and T.J. Sejnowski Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources Neural Comput. 11 2 1999 417 441
36. R.F. Lorch Jr, and J.L. Myers Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 16 1 1990 149 157
37. B.F.J. Manly Randomization, Bootstrap, and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology 2nd ed. 1997 Chapman & Hall London
38. J.L. McClelland, and J.L. Elman The TRACE model of speech perception Cogn. Psychol. 18 1 1986 1 86
39. J.L. McClelland, D. Mirman, and L.L. Holt Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 8 2006 363 369
40. J.M. McQueen, D. Norris, and A. Cutler Are there really interactive processes in speech perception? Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 12 2006 533 author reply 534
41. G.A. Miller, G.A. Heise, and W. Lichten The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials J. Exp. Psychol. 41 5 1951 329 335
42. D. Mirman, J.L. McClelland, and L.L. Holt Response to McQueen et al.: theoretical and empirical arguments support interactive processing Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 12 2006 534
43. D. Mirman, J.L. McClelland, and L.L. Holt An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13 6 2006 958 965
44. R. Naatanen, and I. Winkler The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience Psychol. Bull. 125 6 1999 826 859
45. Nature Neuroscience Editors Analyzing functional imaging studies Nat. Neurosci. 4 4 2001 333
46. D. Norris, and J.M. McQueen Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition Psychol. Rev. 115 2 2008 357 395
47. D. Norris, J.M. McQueen, and A. Cutler Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary Behav. Brain Sci. 23 3 2000 299 325 discussion 325-70
48. D. O'Shaughnessy Interacting with computers by voice: automatic speech recognition and synthesis Proc. IEEE 91 9 2003 1272 1305
49. G.E. Peterson, and H.L. Barney Control methods used in a study of vowels J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24 1952 175 184
50. A. Revonsuo, R. Portin, K. Juottonen, and J.O. Rinne Semantic processing of spoken words in Alzheimer's disease: an electrophysiological study J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10 3 1998 408 420
51. A.G. Samuel Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 110 4 1981 474 494
52. A.G. Samuel Phoneme restoration Lang. Cogn. Process. 11 6 1996 647 653
53. L.D. Sanders, E.L. Newport, and H.J. Neville Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech Nat. Neurosci. 5 7 2002 700 703
54. A.J. Shahin, C.W. Bishop, and L.M. Miller Neural mechanisms for illusory filling-in of degraded speech Neuroimage 44 3 2009 1133 1143
55. C.E. Shannon A mathematical theory of communication Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27 379-423 1948 623 656
56. P. Sivonen, B. Maess, S. Lattner, and A.D. Friederici Phonemic restoration in a sentence context: evidence from early and late ERP effects Brain Res. 1121 1 2006 177 189
57. V. Steinbiss, H. Ney, X. Aubert, S. Besling, C. Dugast, and U. Essen The Philips Research system for continuous speech recognition Phillips J. Res. 49 4 1995 317 352
58. C. Summerfield, and T. Egner Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition Trends Cogn. Sci. 13 9 2009 403 409
59. W.L. Taylor "Cloze procedure": a new tool for measuring readability J. Q. 30 1953 415 433
60. Tierney, A.T. 2010, The Structure and Perception of Human Vocalizations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
61. Y.C. Tsao, G. Weismer, and K. Iqbal Interspeaker variation in habitual speaking rate: additional evidence J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 49 5 2006 1156 1164
62. J.J. van Berkum, P. Hagoort, and C.M. Brown Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400 J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11 6 1999 657 671
63. D. van den Brink, and P. Hagoort The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 6 2004 1068 1084
64. D. van den Brink, C.M. Brown, and P. Hagoort Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13 7 2001 967 985
65. C. Van Petten, and B.J. Luka Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies Brain Lang. 97 3 2006 279 293
66. C. Van Petten, S. Coulson, S. Rubin, E. Plante, and M. Parks Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25 2 1999 394 417
67. R.M. Warren Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds Science 167 917 1970 392 393
68. R.M. Warren, and C.J. Obsuek Speech perception and phonemic restorations Percept. Psychophys. 9 3B 1971 358 362
69. Weide, R.L. 2009, Carnegie Mellon University pronouncing dictionary from http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/cgi-bin/cmudict accessed September 25th, 2009.
70. J.C. Wells Longman Pronunciation Dictionary 1st ed. 1990 Longman Harlow