Response to McQueen et al.: Theoretical and empirical arguments support interactive processing

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 534-

  Mirman, Daniel ^a   McClelland, James L ^b   Holt, Lori L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; LEARNING; LETTER; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESSING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 33751431055     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.003     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. McQueen J.M., et al. Are there really interactive speech processes in speech perception?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 (2006) 533
2. Movellan J.R., and McClelland J.L. The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: implications for models of perception. Psychol. Rev. 108 (2001) 113-148
3. Pitt M.A., and McQueen J.M. Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon?. J. Mem. Lang. 39 (1998) 347-370
4. McClelland J.L., et al. Are there interactive processes in speech perception?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 (2006) 363-369
5. Magnuson J.S., et al. Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: a tale of two systems?. Cogn. Sci. 27 (2003) 801-805
6. Vroomen, J. et al. Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory-visual speech perception: contrasting build-up courses. Neuropsychologia (in press)