An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 958-965

  Mirman, Daniel ^a   McClelland, James L ^b   Holt, Lori L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248198819     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03213909     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BERTELSON, P., VROOMEN, J., & DE GELDER, B. (2003). Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect. Psychological Science, 14, 592-597.
2. BI, G.-Q., & POO, M.-M. (2001). Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 139-166.
3. CARPENTER, G. A., & GROSSBERG, S. (1991). Pattern recognition by selforganizing neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. DAVIS, M. H., JOHNSRUDE, I. S., HERVAIS- ADELMAN, A., TAYLOR, K., & MCGETTIGAN, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 222-241.
5. EISNER, F., & MCQUEEN, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224-238.
6. ELMAN, J. L., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 143-165.
7. GANONG, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 110-125.
8. GROSSBERG, S. (1976). Adaptive pattern classification and universal receding: Part I. Parallel development and coding of neural feature detectors. Biological Cybernetics, 23, 121-134.
9. GROSSBERG, S. (1987). Competitive learning: From interactive activation to adaptive resonance. Cognitive Science, 11, 23-63.
10. GUENTHER, F. H., & GJAJA, M. N. (1996). The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1111-1121.
11. HEBB, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.
12. KRALJIC, T., & SAMUEL, A. G. (2005). Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? Cognitive Psychology, 51, 141-178.
13. KRALJIC, T., & SAMUEL, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 262-268.
14. KRALJIC, T., & SAMUEL, A. G. (in press). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory & Language.
15. LEE, T. S., & NGUYEN, M. (2001). Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 1907-1911.
16. MAGNUSON, J. S., MCMURRAY, B., TANENHAUS, M. K., & ASLIN, R. N. (2003). Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: The ghost of Christmash past. Cognitive Science, 27, 285-298.
17. MAYE, J., ASLIN, R. N., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (2003, March). In search of the Weckud Welch: Online adaptation to speaker accent. Poster presented at the CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing, Cambridge, MA.
18. MCCANDLISS, B. D., FIEZ, J. A., PROTOPAPAS, A., CONWAY, M., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 89-108.
19. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
20. MCCLELLAND, J. L., MIRMAN, D., & HOLT, L. L. (2006). Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 363-369.
21. MCQUEEN, J. M., CUTLER, A., & NORRIS, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30, 1113-1126.
22. MIRMAN, D., MCCLELLAND, J. L., & HOLT, L. L. (2005). Computational and behavioral investigations of lexically induced delays in phoneme recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 424-443.
23. NORRIS, D., MCQUEEN, J. M., & CUTLER, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
24. NORMS, D., MCQUEEN, J. M., & CUTLER, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204-238.
25. OJA, E. (1982). A simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 15, 267-273.
26. O'REILLY, R. C. (1996). Biologically plausible error-driven learning using local activation differences: The generalized recirculation algorithm. Neural Computation, 8, 895-938.
27. RUMELHART, D. E., & ZIPSER, D. (1985). Feature discovery by competitive learning. Cognitive Science, 9, 75-112.
28. SAMUEL, A. G. (1997). Lexical activation produces potent phonemic percepts. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 97-127.
29. SAMUEL, A. G. (2001). Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science, 12, 348-351.
30. SAMUEL, A. G., & PITT, M. A. (2003). Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 416-434.
31. VON DER MALSBURG, C. (1973). Self-organization of orientation sensitive cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetik, 14, 85-100.