Development and evaluation of computer-assisted assessment in higher education in relation to BS7988

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 583-595

  Shephard, Kerry ^a   Warburton, Bill ^a   Maier, Pat ^a   Warren, Adam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60349107905     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930600679621     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alexander, S. & Hedberg, J. (1994) Evaluating technology based learning: which model? In: K. Beatie, C. McNaught & S. Wills (Eds) Multimedia in education: designing for change in teaching and learning (Amsterdam, Elsevier), 233-244.
2. Bain, J. D. (1999) Introduction, Higher Education Research and Development, 18(2), 165-172.
3. Boyle, A. & O'Hare, D. (2003) Finding appropriate methods to assure quality computer-based assessment development in UK higher education, in: J. Christie (Ed.) Proceedings of seventh international CAA conference, Loughborough 8-9 July 2003, Loughborough University. Available online at: http://s-d.lboro.ac.uk/caanew/pastConferences/2003/procedings/index.asp (accessed 4 May 2005).
4. British Standards Institution (BSI) (2002) BS7988: 200-code of practice for the use of information technology in the delivery of assessments (London, British Standards Institution).
5. Bull, J. & Hesketh, I. (2001) Computer-assisted assessment centre update, in: M. Danson (Ed.) Proceedings of fifth international CAA conference, Loughborough, Loughborough University. Available online at: http://s-d.lboro.ac.uk/caanew/pastConferences/2001/index.asp (accessed 4 May 2005).
6. Bull, J. & McKenna, C. (2003) A blueprint for computer-assisted assessment (London, Routledge Falmer).
7. Conole, G. & Warburton, W. (2005) A review of computer-assisted assessment, Journal of the Association for learning Technology, 13(1), 17-31.
8. Danson, M., Dawson, B. & Baseley, T. (2001) Large scale implementation of Question Mark Perception (V2.5)-experiences at Loughborough University, in: M. Danson (Ed.) Proceedings of fifth international CAA conference, Loughborough, Loughborough University. Available online at: http://s-d.lboro.ac.uk/caanew/pastConferences/2001/index.asp (accessed 4 May 2005).
9. Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. & Foster, P. (2000) Case study method (London, Sage).
10. Hambrick, K. (2002) Critical issues in online, large-scale assessment: an exploratory study to identify and refine issues. Unpublished PhD thesis, Capella University, USA.
11. Harwood, I. A. (2005) When computer-aided assessments go wrong: disaster recovery after a major failure, British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 587-597.
12. Harwood, I. & Warburton, W. (2004) Thinking the unthinkable: using project risk management when introducing computer-assisted assessments, in: M. Ashby & R. Wilson (Eds) Proceedings of eighth international CAA conference, Loughborough, Loughborough University. Available online at: http://s-d.lboro.ac.uk/caanew/pastConferences/2004/index.asp (accessed 4 May 2005).
13. Kleeman, J. & Osborne, C. (2002) A practical look at delivering assessments to BS 7988 recommendations, in: M. Danson (Ed) Proceedings of sixth international CAA conference, Loughborough 9-10 July 2002, Loughborough University. Available online at: http://s-.lboro.ac.uk/caanew/pastConferences/2002/proceedings/index.asp (accessed 4 May 2005).
14. Nichols, D. & Greenhow, M. (2002) Using Perception 3 for testing mathematics, MSOR Connections, 2(3), 19-22.
15. Ottewill, R., Fill, K. & Shephard, K. (2002) Assessing the contribution of collections of case studies to academic development in higher education, International Journal of Academic Development, 7(1), 51-62.
16. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2000) Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education section 6: assessment of students. Available online at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/public/Cop/COPaosfinal/contents.htm (accessed 30 September 2004).
17. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2004) Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education section 2: collaborative provision, and flexible and distributed learning (including e-learning). Available online at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/public/COP/cprovis/contents.htm (accessed 30 September 2004).
18. Van Rentergem, L., Cosemans, D., Verburgh, A. & Wils, A. (2002) A campus wide set up of Question Mark Perception (V2.5) at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium)-facing a large scale implementation, in: M. Danson (Ed.) Proceedings of sixth international CAA conference, Loughborough, Loughborough University. Available online at: http://s-d.lboro.ac.uk/caanew/pastConferences/2002/index.asp (accessed 4 May 2005).
19. Warburton, W. & Conole, G. (2003) CAA in UK HEIs: the state of the art, in: J. Christie (Ed.) Proceedings of seventh international CAA conference. Loughborough, Loughborough University. Available online at: http://s-d.lboro.ac.uk/caanew/pastConferences/2003/procedings/index.asp (accessed 4 May 2005).
20. Warburton, W. & Harwood, I. (2004) Implementing perception across a large HEI: getting it right, Perception European Users Conference, Edinburgh, Question Mark Computing. Available online at: http://www.questionmark.com/uk/conference/2004/index.htm (accessed 4 May 2005).
21. Zakrzewski, S. & Steven, C. (2000) A model for computer-based assessment: the Catherine wheel principle, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 201-215.
22. Zakrzewski, S. & Steven, C. (2003) Computer-based assessment: quality assurance issues, the hub of the wheel, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 609-623.