Infuence of the body on crossmodal interference eVects between tactile and two-dimensional visual stimuli

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 204, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 419-430

  Igarashi, Yuka ^a,b   Kitagawa, Norimichi ^c   Ichihara, Shigeru ^b  

^a KANAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation   (Japan)

Author keywords

Body representation; Crossmodal interference efects; Hand; Proprioception; Visuotactile interactions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; BODY POSTURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CROSSMODAL INTERFERENCE TASK; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ARTICLE; HAND; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VIBRATION; VISION;

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VIBRATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77958195783     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2267-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Armel KC, Ramachandran VS (2003) Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:1499-1506 (Pubitemid 36851274)
2. Austen EL, Soto-Faraco S, Enns JT, Kingstone A (2004) Mislocaliza-tions of touch to a fake hand. Cogn AVect Behav Neurosci 4:170-181
3. Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756 (Pubitemid 28099666)
4. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433-436 (Pubitemid 127582520)
5. di Pellegrino G, Làdavas E, Farnè A (1997) Seeing where your hands are. Nature 388:730 (Pubitemid 27375145)
6. Ehrsson HH, Spence C, Passingham RE (2004) That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex re Xects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305:875-877 (Pubitemid 39038424)
7. Farnè A, Pavani F, Meneghello F, Làdavas E (2000) Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain 123:2350-2360
8. Galfano G, Pavani F (2005) Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows. Exp Brain Res 166:518-527 (Pubitemid 41502095)
9. Gallace A, Soto-Faraco S, Dalton P, Kreukniet B, Spence C (2008) Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency e Vects. Exp Brain Res 191:171-186
10. Graziano MSA, Gross CG, Taylor CSR, Moore T (2004) A system of multimodal areas in the primate brain. In: Spence C, Driver J (eds) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 51-67
11. Haggard P, Wolpert D (2005) Disorder of body schema. In: Freund HJ, Jeannerod M, Hallet M, Leiguarda R (eds) Higher-order motor disorders. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 261-272
12. Holmes NP, Spence C (2006) Beyond the body schema: visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness. In: Knoblich G, Thornton IM, Grosjean M, Shi Vrar M (eds) Human body perception from the inside out. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15-64
13. Igarashi Y, Kitagawa N, Ichihara S (2004) Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions. Cogn AVect Behav Neuro-sci 4:182-192 (Pubitemid 39167160)
14. Igarashi Y, Kitagawa N, Spence C, Ichihara S (2007) Assessing the in Xuence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task. Acta Psychol 124:190-208
15. Igarashi Y, Kimura Y, Spence C, Ichihara S (2008) The selective e Vect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task. Exp Brain Res 184:31-38 (Pubitemid 350059788)
16. Ladavas E, Farnè A (2004) Neuropsychological evidence for multimodal representations of space near speci Wc body parts. In: Spence C, Driver J (eds) Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 69-98
17. Lippa Y, Adam JJ (2001) An explanation of orthogonal S-R compatibility e Vects that vary with hand or response position: the end-state comfort hypothesis. Percept Psychophys 63:156-174
18. Maravita A, Iriki A (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 8:79-86 (Pubitemid 38169479)
19. Maravita A, Spence C, Sergent C, Driver J (2002) Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychol Sci 13:350-355 (Pubitemid 41692282)
20. Maravita A, Spence C, Driver J (2003) Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Curr Biol 13:R531-R539 (Pubitemid 36815254)
21. Old Weld RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113
22. Parsons LM (1987) Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet. Cogn Psychol 19:178-241
23. Parsons LM (1994) Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior re Xected in mentally simulated action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:709-730
24. Parsons LM (2001) Integrating cognitive psychology, neurology and neuroimaging. Acta Psychol 107:155-181 (Pubitemid 33647318)
25. Parsons LM, Fox PT, Downs JH, Glass T, Hirsch TB, Martin CC, Jerabek PA, Lancaster JL (1995) Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 375:54-58
26. Pavani F, Castiello U (2004) Binding personal and extrapersonal space through body shadows. Nat Neurosci 7:13-14
27. Pavani F, Galfano G (2007) Self-attributed body-shadows modulate tactile attention. Cognition 104:73-88 (Pubitemid 46627561)
28. Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J (2000) Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci 11:353-359
29. Pelli DG (1997) The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437-442 (Pubitemid 127582521)
30. Schwoebel J, Friedman R, Duda N, Coslett HB (2001) Pain and the body schema: evidence for peripheral e Vects on mental representations of movement. Brain 124:2098-2104 (Pubitemid 32951758)
31. Sekiyama K (1982) Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identi Wcation of left and right hands. Percept Psychophys 32:89-95 (Pubitemid 13236728)
32. Sekiyama K (1983) Mental and physical movements of hands: kinesthetic information preserved in representational systems. Jpn Psychol Res 25:95-102
33. Shore DI, Barnes ME, Spence C (2006) Temporal aspects of the visuo-tactile congruency e Vect. Neurosci Lett 392:96-100 (Pubitemid 41757583)
34. Soto-Faraco S, Ronald A, Spence C (2004) Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contribution of vision and proprioception. Percept Psychophys 66:1077-1094 (Pubitemid 40687360)
35. Spence C, Kingstone A, Shore DI, Gazzaniga MS (2001) Representation of visuotactile space in the split-brain. Psychol Sci 12:90-93
36. Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J (2004a) Spatial constraints on visual-tactile crossmodal distractor congruency e Vects. Cogn AVect Behav Neurosci 4:148-169 (Pubitemid 39167158)
37. Spence C, Pavani F, Maravita A, Holmes N (2004b) Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile periperson-al space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. J Physiol Paris 98:171-189 (Pubitemid 39359116)
38. Spence C, Pavani F, Maravita A, Holmes NP (2008) Multi-sensory interactions. In: Lin MC, Otaduy MA (eds) Haptic rendering: foundations, algorithms, and applications. AK Peters, Wellesley, pp 21-52
39. Tomasino B, Rumiati RI, Umilta CA (2003) Selective de Wcit of motor imagery as tapped by a left-right decision of visually presented hands. Brain Cogn 53:376-380 (Pubitemid 37377680)