The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 184, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 31-38

  Igarashi, Yuka ^a   Kimura, Yota ^b   Spence, Charles ^c   Ichihara, Shigeru ^a  

^a TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crossmodal congruency; Hand image; Visuotactile interactions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DRAWING; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; INDEX FINGER; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VIBRATION; VISION; VISUOTACTILE INTERACTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ART; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; VIBRATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 35848947563     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1076-z     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Austen EL, Soto-Faraco S, Enns JT, Kingstone A (2004) Mislocations of touch to a fake hand. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4:170-181
2. Cho YS, Proctor RW (2003) Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychon Bull Rev 10:45-73
3. Driver J (1999) Egocentric and object-based visual neglect. In: Burgess N, Jeffrey KJ, O'Keefe J (eds) The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 67-89
4. Egly R, Driver J, Rafal RD (1994) Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J Exp Psychol Gen 123:161-177
5. Ehrsson HH, Spence C, Passingham RE (2004) That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305:875-877
6. Fiorio M, Haggard P (2005) Viewing the body prepares the brain for touch: effects of TMS over somatosensory cortex. Eur J Neurosci 22:773-777
7. Galfano G, Pavani F (2005) Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows. Exp Brain Res 166:518-527
8. Holmes NP, Spence C (2006) Beyond the body schema: visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness. In: Knoblich G, Thornton IM, Grosjean M, Shiffrar M (eds) Human body perception from the inside out. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15-64
9. Holmes NP, Farnè A, Rode G, Rossetti Y (2007) I know it like the back of your hand: attribution biases in hand self-recognition. Neuropsychologia (submitted)
10. Igarashi Y, Kitagawa N, Ichihara S (2004) Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4:182-192
11. Igarashi Y, Kitagawa N, Spence C, Ichihara S (2007) Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task. Acta Psychol 124:190-208
12. Kennett S, Taylor-Clarke M, Haggard P (2001) Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Curr Biol 11:1188-1191
13. Kitagawa N, Spence C (2005) Investigating the effect of a transparent barrier on the crossmodal congruency effect. Exp Brain Res 161:62-71
14. Kosslyn SM, DiGirolamo GJ, Thompson WL, Alpert NM (1998) Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. Psychophysiology 35:151-161
15. Lippa Y, Adam JJ (2001) An explanation of orthogonal S-R compatibility effects that vary with hand or response position: the end-state comfort hypothesis. Percept Psychophys 63:156-174
16. Maravita A, Spence C, Sergent C, Driver J (2002) Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychol Sci 13:350-355
17. Maravita A, Spence C, Driver J (2003) Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Curr Biol 13:R531-R539
18. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113
19. Parsons LM (1987) Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet. Cogn Psychol 19:178-241
20. Parsons LM (1994) Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 20:709-730
21. Parsons LM (2001) Integrating cognitive psychology, neurology and neuroimaging. Acta Psychol 107:155-181
22. Parsons LM, Fox PT, Downs JH, Glass T, Hirsch TB, Martin CC, Jerabek PA, Lancaster JL (1995) Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 375:54-58
23. Pavani F, Castiello U (2004) Binding personal and extrapersonal space through body shadows. Nat Neurosci 7:13-14
24. Pavani F, Galfano G (2007) Self-attributed body-shadows modulate tactile attention. Cognition 104:73-88
25. Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J (2000) Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci 11:353-359
26. Sanchez-Vives MV, Slater M (2005) From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:332-338
27. Schaefer M, Heinze H-J, Rotte M (2005) Viewing touch improves tactile sensory threshold. Neuroreport 16:367-370
28. Schwoebel J, Friedman R, Duda N, Coslett HB (2001) Pain and the body schema: evidence for peripheral effects on mental representations of movement. Brain 124:2098-2104
29. Sekiyama K (1982) Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands. Percept Psychophys 32:89-95
30. Sekiyama K (1983) Mental and physical movements of hands: kinesthetic information preserved in representational systems. Jpn Psychol Res 25:95-102
31. Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171:701-703
32. Sheridan TB (1992) Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 1:120-126
33. Shore DI, Barnes ME, Spence C (2006) Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect. Neurosci Lett 392:96-100
34. Soto-Faraco S, Ronald A, Spence C (2004) Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contribution of vision and proprioception. Percept Psychophys 66:1077-1094
35. Soto-Faraco S, Sinnett S, Alsius A, Kingstone A (2006) Spatial orienting of tactile attention induced by social cues. Psychon Bull Rev 12:1024-1031
36. Spence C, Kingstone A, Shore DI, Gazzaniga MS (2001) Representation of visuotactile space in the split-brain. Psychol Sci 12:90-93
37. Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J (2004a) Spatial constraints on visual-tactile crossmodal distractor congruency effects. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4:148-169
38. Spence C, Pavani F, Maravita A, Holmes N (2004b) Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. J Physiol (Paris) 98:175-189
39. Taylor-Clarke M, Kennett S, Haggard P (2002) Vision modulate somatosensory cortical processing. Curr Biol 12:233-236
40. Thomas R, Press C, Haggard P (2006) Shared representations in body perception. Acta Psychol 121:317-330
41. Tipper SP, Lloyd D, Shorland B, Dancer C, Howard LA, McGlone F (1998) Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. Neuroreport 9:1741-1744
42. Tipper SP, Phillips N, Dancer C, Lloyd D, Howard LA, McGlone F (2001) Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Exp Brain Res 139:160-167
43. Tomasino B, Rumiati RI, Umilta CA (2003) Selective deficit of motor imagery as tapped by a left-right decision of visually presented hands. Brain Cogn 53:376-380
44. Townsend JT, Ashby FG (1978) Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In: Castellan NJ, Restle F (eds) Cognitive theory, vol 3, pp 199-239. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
45. Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 31:80-91
46. Whiteley L, Kennett S, Taylor-Clarke M, Haggard P (2004) Facilitated processing of visual stimuli associated with the body. Perception 33:307-314
47. Whiteley L, Spence C, Haggard P (2007) Visual processing and the bodily self. Acta Psychol (in press)
48. Wuillemin D, Richardson B (1982) On the failure to recognize the back of one's own hand. Perception 11:53-55