Tactile selective attention and body posture: Assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1077-1094

  Soto Faraco, Salvador ^a,b   Ronald, Angelica ^a,c   Spence, Charles ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Universitat de Barcelona ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142301127     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196837     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. AGLIOTI, S., SMANIA, N., & PERU, A. (1999). Frames of reference for mapping tactile stimuli in brain-damaged patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 67-79.
2. AUSTEN, E. L., SOTO-FARACO, S., ENNS, J. T., & KINGSTONE, A. (2004). Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 170-181.
3. BENEDETTI, F. (1985). Processing of tactile spatial information with crossed fingers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 517-525.
4. BENEDETTI, F. (1988). Exploration of a rod with crossed fingers. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 281-284.
5. BOTVINICK, M., & COHEN, J. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that the eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
6. BRIGNER, W. L. (1984). Rotation of space-time plane predicts a new illusion of spatial displacement. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 59, 359-369.
7. BURNETT, C. T. (1904). Studies on the influence of abnormal position upon the motor impulse. Psychological Review, 11, 370-394.
8. CHAN, J. S., MERRIFIELD, K., & SPENCE, C. (2004). Auditory spatial attention assessed in a flanker interference task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. COLE, J. (1991). Pride and a daily marathon. London: Duckworth.
10. CRAIG, J. C. (1974). Vibrotactile difference thresholds for intensity and the effect of a masking stimulus. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 123-127.
11. CRAIG, J. C., & BUSEY, T. A. (2003). The effect of motion on tactile and visual temporal order judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 81-94.
12. DRIVER, J., & GROSSENBACHER, P. G. (1996). Multimodal spatial constraints on tactile selective attention. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 209-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. DRIVER, J., & SPENCE, C. (1998a). Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 254-262.
14. DRIVER, J., & SPENCE, C. (1998b). Crossmodal links in spatial attention. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 353, 1319-1331.
15. EIMER, M., COCKBURN, D., SMEDLEY, B., & DRIVER, J. (2001). Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 398-411.
16. EIMER, M., & SCHRÖGER, E. (1998). ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology, 35, 313-327.
17. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
18. EVANS, P. M., & CRAIG, J. C. (1991). Tactile attention and the perception of moving tactile stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 355-364.
19. EVANS, P. M., CRAIG, J. C., & RINKER, M. A. (1992). Perceptual processing of adjacent and nonadjacent tactile nontargets. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 571-581.
20. GILSON, R. D. (1969). Vibrotactile masking: Some spatial and temporal aspects. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 176-180.
21. HENRI, V. (1898). Über die Raumwahrnehmung des Tastsinnes: Ein Beitrag zur experimentellen Psychologie [On the spatial perception of the tactile sense: A contribution to experimental psychology]. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.
22. HOLMES, N. P., CROZIER, G., & SPENCE, C. (2004). When mirrors lie: "Visual capture" of arm position impairs reaching performance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 193-200.
23. HONORÉ, J. (1982). Posture oculaire et attention selective a des stimuli cutanes [Eye position and selective attention to cutaneous stimuli]. Neuropsychologia, 20, 727-730.
24. HONORÉ, J., BOURDEAUD' HUI, M., & SPARROW, L. (1989). Reduction of cutaneous reaction time by directing eyes towards the source of stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 27, 367-371.
25. HORNER, D. T. (1995). The effect of location on the discrimination of spatial vibrotactile patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 463-474.
26. HORNER, D. T. (1997). The effect of shape and location on temporal masking of spatial vibrotactile patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1255-1265.
27. HORNER, D. T. (2000). Perceptual processing at adjacent locations on a single finger: Masking and response competition. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1545-1555.
28. JONES, F. N. (1956). Space-time relationships in somesthetic localization. Science, 124, 484.
29. KEHNETT, S., EIMER, M., SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (2001). Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: Convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 462-478.
30. KENNETT, S., SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (2002). Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1083-1094.
31. KIM, D. H., & CRUSE, H. (2001). Two kinds of body representation are used to control hand movements following tactile stimulation. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 76-91.
32. KITAZAWA, S. (2002). Where conscious sensation takes place. Consciousness & Cognition, 11, 475-477.
33. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
34. KLEIN, R. M., & SHORE, D. I. (2000). Relationships among modes of visual orienting. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 195-208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. LAKATOS, S., & SHEPARD, R. N. (1997). Time-distance relations in shifting attention between locations on one's body. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 557-566.
36. MANGUN, R. G., HILLYARD, S. A., & LUCK, S. J. (1993) Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 219-243). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. MARAVITA, A., SPENCE, C., CLARKE, K., HUSAIN, M., & DRIVER, J. (2000). Vision and touch through the looking glass in a case of cross-modal extinction. NeuroReport, 11, 3521-3526.
38. MARAVITA, A., SPENCE, C., SERGENT, C., & DRIVER, J. (2002). Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychological Science, 13, 350-356.
39. MEYER, V., GROSS, C. G., & TEUBER, H. L. (1963). Effect of knowledge of site of stimulation on the threshold for pressure sensitivity. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 16, 637-640.
40. MONDOR, T. A., & ZATORRE, R. J. (1995). Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 387-409.
41. MOSCOVITCH, M., & BEHRMANN, M. (1994). Coding Of spatial information in the somatosensory system: Evidence from patients with neglect following parietal lobe damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 151-155.
42. NIELSEN, T. I. (1963). Volition: A new experimental approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 225-230.
43. PAVANI, F., SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353-359.
44. PENFIELD, W., & RASMUSSEN, T. (1950). The cerebral cortex of man. New York: Macmillan.
45. PONZO, M. (1910). Intorno ad alcune illusioni nel campo delle sensazioni tattili, sull'illusione di Aristotele e fenomeni analoghi [On some tactile illusions, Aristotle's illusion, and similar phenomena]. Archiv für die Gesamte Psychologie, 16, 307-345.
46. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., & ROGERS-RAMACHANDRAN, D. (1996). Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 263, 377-386.
48. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., ROGERS-RAMACHANDRAN, D., & COBB, S. (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature, 377, 489-490.
49. RINKER, M. A., & CRAIG, J. C. (1994). The effect of spatial orientation on the perception of moving tactile stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 356-362.
50. RÖOER, B., SPENCE, C., & RÖSLER, F. (2000). Inhibition of return and oculomotor control in the blind. NeuroReport, 11, 3043-3045.
51. SATHIAN, K., GREENSPAN, A. I., & WOLF, S. L. (2000). Doing it with mirrors: A case study of a novel approach to neurohabilitation. Neurohabilitation & Neural Repair, 14, 73-76.
52. SHORE, D. I., SPRY, E., & SPENCE, C. (2002). Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 153-163.
53. SPENCE, C. (2001). Crossmodal attentional capture: A controversy resolved? In C. Folk & B. Gibson (Eds.), Attention, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture (pp. 231-262). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
54. SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (1996). Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1005-1030.
55. SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (1997). Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1-22.
56. SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (EDS.) (2004). Crossmodal space and cross-modal attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. SPENCE, C., HARRIS, C., & ZAMPINI, M. (2003, July). The "Japanese illusion" revisited? Impaired vibrotactile movement discrimination with interleaved fingers. Paper presented at the EPS Meeting, Reading, U.K.
58. SPENCE, C., KINGSTONE, A., SHORE, D. I., & GAZZANIGA, M. S. (2001). Representation of visuotactile space in the split brain. Psychological Science, 12, 90-93
59. SPENCE, C., LLOYD, D., MCGLONE, F., NICHOLLS, M. E. R., & DRIVER, J. (2000). Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch and audition. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 42-48.
60. SPENCE, C., & MCGLONE, F. P. (2001). Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention. Experimental Brain Research, 141, 324-330.
61. SPENCE, C., PAVANI, F., & DRIVER, J. (1998). What crossing the hands can reveal about Crossmodal links in spatial attention. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 13.
62. SPENCE, C., PAVANI, F., & DRIVER, J. (2000). Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1298-1319.
63. SPENCE, C., PAVANI, F., MARAVITA, A., & HOLMES, N. (2004). Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Journal of Physiology, 98, 171-189.
64. SPENCE, C., SHORE, D. I., GAZZANIGA, M. S., SOTO-FARACO, S., & KINGSTONE, A. (2001). Failure to remap visuotactile space across the midline in the split-brain. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 135-142.
65. SPENCE, C., SHORE, D. I., & KLEIN, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 799-832.
66. SPENCE, C., & WALTON, M. (2004). Cross-modal congruency and visual capture in a visual elevation-discrimination task. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 113-120.
67. STYLES, E. A. (1997). The psychology of attention. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
68. TASTEVIN, J. (1937). En partant de l'expérience d'Aristote: Les dé-placements artificiels des parties du corps ne sont pas suivis par le sentiment de ces parties ni par les sensations qu'on peut y produire [Starting from Aristotle's illusion: The artificial displacements of body parts are not followed by feeling in these parts or by the sensations which can be produced there]. L'Encephale, 1, 57-84, 140-158.
69. TINAZZI, M., FERRARI, G., ZAMPINI, M., & AGLIOTI, S. M. (2000). Neuropsychological evidence that somatic stimuli are spatially coded according to multiple frames of reference in a stroke patient with tactile extinction. Neuroscience Letters, 287, 133-136.
70. TREISMAN, A. [M.] (1998). Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 353, 1295-1306.
71. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12, 97-136.
72. WEILAND, B. A. (1960). The interaction of space and time in cutaneous perception. American Journal of Psychology, 73, 248-255.
73. WEISENBERGER, J. M. (1994). Vibrotactile temporal masking: Effects of multiple maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2213-2220.
74. WEISENBERGER, J. M., & CRAIG, J. C. (1982). A tactile metacontrast effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 530-536.
75. YAMAMOTO, S., & KITAZAWA, S. (2001). Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 759-765.