Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: Comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2084-2091

  Wolf, Florian ^a   Leschka, Sebastian ^b   Loewe, Christian ^a   Homolka, Peter ^a   Plank, Christina ^a   Schernthaner, Ruediger ^a   Bercaczy, Dominik ^a   Goetti, Robert ^b   Lammer, Johannes ^a   Friedrich, Guy ^c   Marincek, Borut ^b   Alkadhi, Hatem ^b   Feuchtner, Gudrun ^b,c  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

128 slice CT; Cardiac CT; Computed tomography; Coronary stents; High pitch spiral mode

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77957943347     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1792-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Carbonaro S, Villines TC, Hausleiter J, Devine PJ, Gerber TC, Taylor AJ (2009) International, multidisciplinary update of the 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:224-232
2. Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Seyfarth T et al (2006) 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study. Acta Radiol 47:36-42
3. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818-826
4. Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 41:22-27
5. Wolf F, Cademartiri F, Loewe C et al (2009) Evaluation of coronary stents with 64-MDCT: in vitro comparison of scanners from four vendors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:787-794
6. Wolf F, Feuchtner GM, Homolka P et al (2008) In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16-and 64-slice CT scanners? Eur J Radiol 68:465-470
7. Maintz D, Burg MC, Seifarth H et al (2009) Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT. Eur Radiol 19:42-492
8. Ertel D, Lell MM, Harig F, Flohr T, Schmidt B, Kalender WA (2009) Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 19:2357-2362
9. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117-121
10. Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 19:2576-2583
11. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of highpitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 19:2896-2903
12. Homolka P, Gahleitner A, Prokop M, Nowotny R (2002) Optimization of the composition of phantom materials for computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 47:2907-2916
13. Menzel HSH, Teunen D (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Publication no EUR 16262 EN, European Commission, Luxembourg
14. Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D et al (2009) Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1045-1050
15. Arnoldi E, Johnson TR, Rist C et al (2009) Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary CTA compared with retrospective techniques. Eur Radiol 19:2147-2155
16. Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffmann U et al (2007) Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:933-938
17. Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C et al (2008) Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart 94:848-854
18. Sun Z, Davidson R, Lin CH (2009) Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 69:489-495
19. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27:2567-2572
20. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW et al (2007) Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology 245:416-423
21. Haraldsdottir S, Gudnason T, Sigurdsson AF et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j. ejrad.2009.05.030
22. Das KM, El-Menyar AA, Salam AM et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology 245:424-432
23. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:951-959
24. Hecht HS, Zaric M, Jelnin V, Lubarsky L, Prakash M, Roubin G (2008) Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 101:820-824
25. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B (2008) Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:56-63
26. Carrabba N, Bamoshmoosh M, Carusi LM et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 100:1754-1758
27. Boll DT, Merkle EM, Paulson EK, Fleiter TR (2008) Coronary stent patency: dual-energy multidetector CT assessment in a pilot study with anthropomorphic phantom. Radiology 247:687-695