Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT

Radiology

Volumn 245, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 416-423

  Schuijf, Joanne D ^a,b   Pundziute, Gabija ^c   Jukema, J Wouter ^a,b   Lamb, Hildo J ^a   Tuinenburg, Joan C ^a   Van Der Hoeven, Barend L ^a   De Roos, Albert ^a   Reiber, Johannes H C ^a   Van Der Wall, Ernst E ^a,b   Schalij, Martin J ^a   Bax, Jeroen J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESTENOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 35348939108     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2452061199     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Krone RJ, Johnson L, Noto T. Five year trends in cardiac catheterization: a report from the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:31-35.
2. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756-1824.
3. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001;103:2535-2338.
4. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ, et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:913-918.
5. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318-2323.
6. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2006;92:58-61.
7. Kitagawa T, Fujii T, Tomohiro Y, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 2006;109:188-194.
8. Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 2003;89:167-172.
9. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:427-430.
10. Cademartiri F, Marano R, Runza G, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience. Radiol Med (Torino) 2005;109:500-507.
11. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 2006;16:818-826.
12. Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R, et al. 64- versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 2006;41:22-27.
13. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2567-2572.
14. Hong C, Chrysant GS, Woodard PK, Bae KT. Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: initial experience. Radiology 2004;233:286-291.
15. Watanabe M, Uemura S, Iwama H, et al. Usefulness of 16-slice multislice spiral computed tomography for follow-up study of coronary stent implantation. Circ J 2006;70:691-697.
16. Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ, et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 1985;71:280-288.
17. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data-analysis using generalized linear-models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22.
18. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2006;22:101-105.
19. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1573-1579.
20. Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Seyfarth T, et al. 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study. Acta Radiol 2006;47:36-42.
21. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1315-1323.
22. Gordon PC, Gibson CM, Cohen DJ, Carrozza JP, Kuntz RE, Baim DS. Mechanisms of restenosis and redilation within coronary stents - quantitative angiographic assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:1166-1174.