Usefulness of 64-Detector Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosing In-Stent Restenosis in Native Coronary Arteries

American Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 101, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 820-824

  Hecht, Harvey S ^a   Zaric, Maja ^a   Jelnin, Vladimir ^a   Lubarsky, Lev ^a   Prakash, Manish ^a   Roubin, Gary ^a  

^a LENOX HILL HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 40149096370     PISSN: 00029149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.09.117     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hendel R.C., Patel M.R., Kramer C.M., and Poon M.R. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1475-1497
2. Kruger S., Mahnken A.H., Sinha A.M., Borghans A., Dedden K., Hoffmann R., and Hanrath P. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 89 (2003) 167-172
3. Cademartiri F., Mollet N., Lemos P.A., Pugliese F., Baks T., McFadden E.P., Krestin G.P., and de Feyter P.J. Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 96 (2005) 799-802
4. Schuijf J.D., Bax J.J., Jukema J.W., Lamb H.J., Warda H.M.A., Vliegen H.W., de Roos A., and van der Wall E.E. Feasibility.assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 94 (2004) 427-430
5. Gilard M., Cornily J.C., Pennec P.Y., Le Gal G., Nonent M., Mansourati J., Blanc J.J., and Boschatet J. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 92 (2006) 58-61
6. Gaspar T., Halon D.A., Lewis B.S., Adawi S., Schliamser J.E., Rubinshtein R., Flugelman M.Y., and Peled N. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 1573-1579
7. Rist C., vonZiegler F., Nikolaou K., Kirchin M.A., Wintersperger B.J., Johnson T.R., Knez A., Leber A.W., Reiser M.F., and Becker C.R. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Acad Radiol 13 (2006) 1465-1473
8. Rixe J., Achenbach S., Ropers D., Ulrich Baum U., Kuettner A., Ropers U., Bautz W., Daniel W., and Anders K. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27 (2006) 2567-2572
9. Cademartiri F., Schuijf J.D., Pugliese F., Mollet N.R., Jukema W., Maffei E., Kroft L.J., Palumbo A., Ardissino D., Serruys P.W., et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 2204-2210
10. Ehara M., Kawai M., Surmely J., Matsubara T., Terashima M., Tsuchikane E., Kinoshita Y., Ito T., Takeda Y., Nasu K., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 951-959
11. Oncel D., Oncel G., and Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience. Radiology 242 (2007) 403-408
12. Austen W.G., Edwards J.E., and Frye R.L. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad-Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery. Circulation 51 (1975) 5-40
13. Kefer J.M., Coche E., Vanoverschelde J.J., and Berber B.L. Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 87-96
14. Stone G.W., Ellis S.G., Cox D.A., Hermiller J., O'Shaughnessy C., Mann J.T., Turco M., Caputo R., Bergin P., Greenberg J., Popma J.J., and Russell M.E. A polymer-based, paclitaxel eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 221-231
15. Morice M.C., Serruys P.W., Sousa J.E., Fajadet J., Ban Hayashi E., Perin M., Colombo A., Schuler G., Barragan P., Guagliumi G., Molnar F., and Falotico R. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 346 (2002) 1773-1780
16. Moses J.W., Leon M.B., Popma J.J., Fitzgerald P.J., Holmes D.R., O'Shaughnessy C., Caputo R.P., Kereiakes D.J., Williams D.O., Teirstein P.S., Jaeger J.L., and Kuntz R.E. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 1315-1323