64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: A phantom study

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 36-42

  Mahnken, A H ^a   Muhlenbruch G ^a   Seyfarth, T ^a   Flohr, T ^a   Stanzel, S ^a   Wildberger, J E ^a   Gunther R W ^a   Kuettner, A ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angiography; Coronary vessels; CT computed tomography (CT); Multi detector row coronary vessels; Stents and prostheses computed tomography CT

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; BLOOD VESSELS; CONTRAST MEDIA; SCANNING;

ARTERY STENTS; CORONARY VESSELS; MULTI-DETECTOR ROW-CORONARY VESSELS; STENTS AND PROSTHESES-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CT;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; GRAFT OCCLUSION; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STENT;

ARTIFACTS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 31744445600     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850500406779     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anonymous. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2004 update. Dallas: American Heart Association 2003.
2. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Santoro GM, Bolognese L, Trapani M, Cerisano G, et al. Restenosis after coronary stenting in current clinical practice. Am Heart J 1998;135:510-18.
3. Buckwalter K, Rydberg J, Rankin J. Parameters affecting isotropic visualization with 4, 16, and 40 slice multi-channel CT scanners: relevance to small joint imaging. Radiology 2004;233:S200.
4. Buecker A, Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Guenther RW. Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent. Circulation 2002;105: 1772-5.
5. Fattori R, Piva T. Drug-eluting stents in vascular intervention. Lancet 2003;361:247-9.
6. Flohr T, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, Simon J, Schaller S, Ohnesorge B. New technical developments in multislice CT. Part 2: Sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning and increased gantry rotation speed for cardiac imaging. Rofo 2002;174:1022-7.
7. Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, Mueller R, Buellesfeld L, Gerckens U, et al. TAXUS I: six- and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation 2003;107:38-42.
8. Knollmann FD, Moller J, Gebert A, Bethge C, Felix R. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency by electron-beam CT. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1341-7.
9. Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, Borghans A, Dedden K, Hoffmann R, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 2003;89:167-72.
10. Maintz D, Botnar RM, Fischbach R, Heindel W, Manning WJ, Stuber M. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for assessment of the stent lumen: a phantom study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2002;4: 359-67.
11. Maintz D, Juergens KU, Wichter T, Grude M, Heindel W, Fischbach R. Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol 2003;13:830-5.
12. Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, Heindel W, Fischbach R. Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. Acta Radiol 2003;44:597-603.
13. Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE, Ruebben A, Stanzel S, Vogt F, et al. Coronary artery stents in mutislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol 2004;39:27-33.
14. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, Herzog C, Stahl J, Stanzel S, et al. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2005;40:8-13.
15. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, Saia F, Lemos PA, McFadden EP, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2265-70.
16. Pump H, Mohlenkamp S, Sehnert CA, Schimpf SS, Schmidt A, Erbel R, et al. Coronary arterial stent patency: assessment with electron-beam CT. Radiology 2000;214:447-52.
17. Regar E, Serruys PW, Bode C, Holubarsch C, Guermonprez JL, Wijns W, et al. Angiographie findings of the multicenter randomized study with the sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity balloon-expandable stent (RAVEL): sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size. Circulation 2002;106:1949-56.
18. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, Anders K, Ulzheimer S, Ohnesorge B, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003;107:664-6.
19. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, Warda HM, Vliegen HW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2004;94:427-30.
20. Willoteaux S, Negawi Z, Lions C, Gaxotte V, Beregi JP. Observations from multidetector CT imaging of different types of renal artery stents. J Endovasc Ther 2004;11:560-9.
21. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Rofo 2004;176:1803-10.