Moving from transcriptional to phospho-evolution: Generalizing regulatory evolution?

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 462-467

  Moses, Alan M ^a   Landry, Christian R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; GENE ACTIVITY; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 77957875163     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Peck, A.L. and Balme, D.M., trans. (1984; 1993) Aristotle: History of Animals (Vols 1-3), Harvard University Press.
2. Dean A.M., Thornton J.W. Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: the functional synthesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:675-688.
3. Chen K., Rajewsky N. The evolution of gene regulation by transcription factors and microRNAs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:93-103.
4. Gerhart J., Kirschner M. The theory of facilitated variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104(Suppl 1):8582-8589.
5. Choudhary C., Mann M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:427-439.
6. Tuch B.B., et al. Evolution of eukaryotic transcription circuits. Science 2008, 319:1797-1799.
7. Wray G.A. The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:206-216.
8. Carroll S.B. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 2008, 134:25-36.
9. Erwin D.H., Davidson E.H. The evolution of hierarchical gene regulatory networks. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:141-148.
10. Levine M., Tjian R. Transcription regulation and animal diversity. Nature 2003, 424:147-151.
11. Borneman A.R., et al. Divergence of transcription factor binding sites across related yeast species. Science 2007, 317:815-819.
12. Odom D.T., et al. Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:730-732.
13. Zheng W., et al. Genetic analysis of variation in transcription factor binding in yeast. Nature 2010, 464:1187-1191.
14. Liu L., et al. Mutation of the CDKN2A 5' UTR creates an aberrant initiation codon and predisposes to melanoma. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21:128-132.
15. Calvo S.E., et al. Upstream open reading frames cause widespread reduction of protein expression and are polymorphic among humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:7507-7512.
16. Rosso L., et al. Birth and rapid subcellular adaptation of a hominoid-specific CDC14 protein. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e140.
17. Gentile S., et al. The human ERG1 channel polymorphism, K897T, creates a phosphorylation site that inhibits channel activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:14704-14708.
18. Ryu G.M., et al. Genome-wide analysis to predict protein sequence variations that change phosphorylation sites or their corresponding kinases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:1297-1307.
19. Toh K.L., et al. An hPer2 phosphorylation site mutation in familial advanced sleep phase syndrome. Science 2001, 291:1040-1043.
20. Vanselow K., et al. Differential effects of PER2 phosphorylation: molecular basis for the human familial advanced sleep phase syndrome (FASPS). Genes Dev. 2006, 20:2660-2672.
21. Basu U., et al. Evolution of phosphorylation-dependent regulation of activation-induced cytidine deaminase. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:285-291.
22. Landry C.R., et al. Weak functional constraints on phosphoproteomes. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:193-197.
23. Nguyen Ba A.N., Moses A.M. Evolution of characterized phosphorylation sites in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:2027-2037.
24. Gnad F., et al. PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites. Genome Biol. 2007, 8:R250.
25. Macek B., et al. Phosphoproteome analysis of E. coli reveals evolutionary conservation of bacterial Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:299-307.
26. Malik R., et al. Comparative conservation analysis of the human mitotic phosphoproteome. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1426-1432.
27. Beltrao P., et al. Evolution of phosphoregulation: comparison of phosphorylation patterns across yeast species. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000134.
28. Carroll S.B., et al. From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design 2001, Blackwell Science.
29. Rockman M.V., et al. Ancient and recent positive selection transformed opioid cis-regulation in humans. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e387.
30. Prabhakar S., et al. Human-specific gain of function in a developmental enhancer. Science 2008, 321:1346-1350.
31. Gompel N., et al. Chance caught on the wing: cis-regulatory evolution and the origin of pigment patterns in Drosophila. Nature 2005, 433:481-487.
32. Prud'homme B., et al. Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene. Nature 2006, 440:1050-1053.
33. Pawson T. Specificity in signal transduction: from phosphotyrosine-SH2 domain interactions to complex cellular systems. Cell 2004, 116:191-203.
34. Lim W.A. Designing customized cell signalling circuits. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:393-403.
35. Serber Z., Ferrell J.E. Tuning bulk electrostatics to regulate protein function. Cell 2007, 128:441-444.
36. Traven A., Heierhorst J. SQ/TQ cluster domains: concentrated ATM/ATR kinase phosphorylation site regions in DNA-damage-response proteins. Bioessays 2005, 27:397-407.
37. Moses A.M., et al. Clustering of phosphorylation site recognition motifs can be exploited to predict the targets of cyclin-dependent kinase. Genome Biol. 2007, 8:R23.
38. Iakoucheva L.M., et al. The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:1037-1049.
39. Hu P., et al. Site-specific interplay between O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation in cellular regulation. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584:2526-2538.
40. Mohideen F., et al. A molecular basis for phosphorylation-dependent SUMO conjugation by the E2 UBC9. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:945-952.
41. Kruse J.P., Gu W. SnapShot: p53 posttranslational modifications. Cell 2008, 133:930-1930.
42. Moses A.M., et al. Regulatory evolution in proteins by turnover and lineage-specific changes of cyclin-dependent kinase consensus sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:17713-17718.
43. Ludwig M.Z., et al. Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element. Nature 2000, 403:564-567.
44. Ludwig M.Z., et al. Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. Development 1998, 125:949-958.
45. Gasch A.P., et al. Conservation and evolution of cis-regulatory systems in ascomycete fungi. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:e398.
46. Lavoie H., et al. Evolutionary tinkering with conserved components of a transcriptional regulatory network. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000329.
47. Tan C.S., et al. Comparative analysis reveals conserved protein phosphorylation networks implicated in multiple diseases. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2:ra39.
48. Holt L.J., et al. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 2009, 325:1682-1686.
49. Drury L.S., Diffley J.F. Factors affecting the diversity of DNA replication licensing control in eukaryotes. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:530-535.
50. Tirosh I., Barkai N. Comparative analysis indicates regulatory neofunctionalization of yeast duplicates. Genome Biol. 2007, 8:R50.
51. Force A., et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 1999, 151:1531-1545.
52. Prince V.E., Pickett F.B. Splitting pairs: the diverging fates of duplicated genes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:827-837.
53. Amoutzias G.D., et al. Posttranslational regulation impacts the fate of duplicated genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:2967-2971.
54. Wittkopp P.J., et al. Regulatory changes underlying expression differences within and between Drosophila species. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:346-350.
55. Landry C.R., et al. Compensatory cis-trans evolution and the dysregulation of gene expression in interspecific hybrids of Drosophila. Genetics 2005, 171:1813-1822.
56. Tirosh I., et al. A yeast hybrid provides insight into the evolution of gene expression regulation. Science 2009, 324:659-662.
57. Ptacek J., et al. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 2005, 438:679-684.
58. Euskirchen G., Snyder M. A plethora of sites. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:325-326.
59. Bradley R.K., et al. Binding site turnover produces pervasive quantitative changes in transcription factor binding between closely related Drosophila species. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000343.
60. Levy E.D., et al. How perfect can protein interactomes be?. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2:pe11.
61. Ubersax J.A., Ferrell J.E. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:530-541.
62. Mok J., et al. Deciphering protein kinase specificity through large-scale analysis of yeast phosphorylation site motifs. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3:ra12.
63. Stone J.R., Wray G.A. Rapid evolution of cis-regulatory sequences via local point mutations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:1764-1770.
64. Schneider T.D. Evolution of biological information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28:2794-2799.
65. Neduva V., Russell R.B. Linear motifs: evolutionary interaction switches. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579:3342-3345.
66. Hahn M.W. Detecting natural selection on cis-regulatory DNA. Genetica 2007, 129:7-18.
67. Mustonen V., et al. Energy-dependent fitness: a quantitative model for the evolution of yeast transcription factor binding sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:12376-12381.
68. Moses A.M. Statistical tests for natural selection on regulatory regions based on the strength of transcription factor binding sites. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:286.
69. Kim J., et al. Evolution of regulatory sequences in 12 Drosophila species. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000330.
70. Sprang S.R., et al. Structural changes in glycogen phosphorylase induced by phosphorylation. Nature 1988, 336:215-221.
71. Ptacek J., Snyder M. Charging it up: global analysis of protein phosphorylation. Trends Genet. 2006, 22:545-554.
72. Cohen P. The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation - a 25 year update. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25:596-601.
73. Seet B.T., et al. Reading protein modifications with interaction domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:473-483.
74. Hunter T. Signaling - 2000 and beyond. Cell 2000, 100:113-127.
75. Malleshaiah M.K., et al. The scaffold protein Ste5 directly controls a switch-like mating decision in yeast. Nature 2010, 465:101-105.