Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2323-2330

  Samulski, Maurice ^a   Hupse, Rianne ^a   Boetes, Carla ^b   Mus, Roel D M ^a   Den Heeten, Gerard J ^c   Karssemeijer, Nico ^a,c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast; Computer assisted; Decision making; Early detection of cancer; Mammography; Radiographic image interpretation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTERS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77957871939     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1821-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. FJ Gilbert SM Astley MG Gillan OF Agbaje MG Wallis J James CR Boggis SW Duffy CADET II Group 2008 Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography N Engl J Med 359 1675 1684 10.1056/NEJMoa0803545 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1Kkt73J 10.1056/NEJMoa0803545 18832239
2. MJ Morton DH Whaley KR Brandt KK Amrami 2006 Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection-prospective evaluation Radiology 239 375 383 10.1148/radiol.2392042121 10.1148/radiol.2392042121 16569779
3. JC Dean CC Ilvento 2006 Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers Am J Roentgenol 187 20 28 10.2214/AJR.05.0111 10.2214/AJR.05.0111 (Pubitemid 46100140)
4. JJ Fenton SH Taplin PA Carney L Abraham EA Sickles C D'Orsi EACG Berns RE Hendrick WE Barlow JG Elmore 2007 Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography N Engl J Med 356 1399 1409 10.1056/NEJMoa066099 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjslOksbg%3D 10.1056/NEJMoa066099 17409321 (Pubitemid 46556325)
5. D Gur JS Stalder LA Hardesty B Zheng JH Sumkin DM Chough BE Shindel HE Rockette 2004 Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment Radiology 233 418 423 10.1148/radiol.2332040277 10.1148/radiol.2332040277 15358846 (Pubitemid 39423800)
6. N Houssami R Given-Wilson S Ciatto 2009 Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 53 171 176 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02062.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MvitFWmug%3D%3D 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02062.x 19527363
7. E Alberdi AA Povyakalo L Strigini P Ayton R Given-Wilson 2008 CAD in mammography: lesion-level versus case-level analysis of the effects of prompts on human decisions Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3 115 122 10.1007/s11548-008-0213-x 10.1007/s11548-008-0213-x
8. SH Taplin CM Rutter CD Lehman 2006 Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 1475 10.2214/AJR.05.0940 10.2214/AJR.05.0940 17114540 (Pubitemid 44788677)
9. N Karssemeijer JD Otten H Rijken R Holland 2006 Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support Br J Radiol 79 S123 S126 10.1259/bjr/37622515 10.1259/bjr/37622515 17209117 (Pubitemid 46151856)
10. N Karssemeijer JD Otten AL Verbeek JH Groenewoud HJ de Koning JH Hendriks R Holland 2003 Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms Radiology 227 192 200 10.1148/radiol.2271011962 10.1148/radiol.2271011962 12616008 (Pubitemid 36384199)
11. D Manning S Ethell T Donovan 2004 Categories of observer error from eye tracking and AFROC data DP Chakraborty MP Eckstein (eds) Proc SPIE: medical imaging 2004- image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment. vol 5372 Bellingham Wash 90 99 10.1117/12.533489 (Pubitemid 40108789)
12. Manning D, Ethell S, Donovan T (2004) Categories of observer error from eye tracking and AFROC data. In: Chakraborty DP, Eckstein MP (eds) Proc SPIE: medical imaging 2004- image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment. vol 5372. Bellingham, Wash, pp 90-99. doi: 10.1117/12.533489 (Pubitemid 40108789)
13. RG Blanks MG Wallis RM Given-Wilson 1999 Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography J Med Screen 6 152 158 10.1136/jms.6.3.152 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FjvFWnsA%3D%3D 10572847
14. LAL Khoo P Taylor RM Given-Wilson 2005 Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study Radiology 237 444 449 10.1148/radiol.2372041362 10.1148/radiol.2372041362 16244252 (Pubitemid 41507878)
15. L Garvican S Field 2001 A pilot evaluation of the R2 image checker system and users' response in the detection of interval breast cancers on previous screening films Clin Radiol 10 833 837 10.1053/crad.2001.0776 10.1053/crad.2001.0776 (Pubitemid 35023814)
16. E Alberdi A Povyakalo L Strigini P Ayton M Hartswood R Procter R Slack 2005 Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation Br J Radiol 78 S31 S40 10.1259/bjr/37646417 10.1259/bjr/37646417 15917444 (Pubitemid 40932505)
17. LJ Warren Burhenne SA Wood CJ D'Orsi SA Feig DB Kopans KF O'Shaughnessy EA Sickles L Tabar CJ Vyborny RA Castellino 2000 Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography Radiology 215 554 562 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3lslSjtw%3D%3D 10796939
18. P Taylor HWW Potts 2008 Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate Eur J Cancer 44 798 807 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016 18353630
19. RM Nishikawa 2007 Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography Comput Med Imaging Graph 31 224 235 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.009 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.009 17386998 (Pubitemid 46601782)
20. P Taylor R Given-Wilson J Champness HW Potts K Johnston 2004 Assessing the impact of CAD on the sensitivity and specificity of film readers Clin Radiol 59 1099 1105 10.1016/j.crad.2004.04.017 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crotlOltA%3D%3D 10.1016/j.crad.2004.04.017 15556592 (Pubitemid 40045623)
21. FJ Gilbert SM Astley CR Boggis MA McGee PM Griffiths SW Duffy OF Agbaje MG Gillan M Wilson AK Jain N Barr UM Beetles MA Griffiths J Johnson RM Roberts HE Deans KA Duncan G Iyengar 2008 Variable size cad prompts and mammography film reader decisions Breast Cancer Res 10 R72 10.1186/bcr2137 10.1186/bcr2137 18724867
22. N Karssemeijer A Hupse M Samulski M Kallenberg C Boetes G Heeten 2008 An interactive computer aided decision support system for detection of masses in mammograms EA Krupinski (eds) Lect notes comput sci. 5116 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg 273 278 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3-38
23. Karssemeijer N, Hupse A, Samulski M, Kallenberg M, Boetes C, Heeten G (2008) An interactive computer aided decision support system for detection of masses in mammograms. In: Krupinski EA (ed) Lect notes comput sci. 5116. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 273-278. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3-38
24. P Taylor J Champness R Given-Wilson K Johnston HW Potts 2005 Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography Health Technol Assess 9 1 70 10.3310/hta9060 15899149
25. Roelofs AA, van Woudenberg S, Hendriks JH, Evertsz CJ, Karssemeijer N (2004) Effects of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection of breast masses. In: Pisano E (ed) Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on digital mammography. Chapel Hill, NC, pp 219-224
26. T Kamitani H Yabuuchi H Soeda Y Matsuo T Okafuji S Sakai A Furuya M Hatakenaka N Ishii H Honda 2007 Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study Eur Radiol 17 1365 1371 10.1007/s00330-006-0452-6 10.1007/s00330-006-0452-6 17093968 (Pubitemid 46691968)
27. D Gur AI Bandos CS Cohen CM Hakim LA Hardesty MA Ganott RL Perrin WR Poller R Shah JH Sumkin LP Wallace HE Rockette 2008 The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations Radiology 249 47 10.1148/radiol.2491072025 10.1148/radiol.2491072025 18682584