CAD in mammography: Lesion-level versus case-level analysis of the effects of prompts on human decisions

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Volumn 3, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 115-122

  Alberdi, Eugenio ^a   Povyakalo, Andrey A ^a   Strigini, Lorenzo ^a   Ayton, Peter ^a   Given Wilson, Rosalind ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer system evaluation; Computer assisted diagnosis; Decision making; Mammography; Screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 45849134868     PISSN: 18616410     EISSN: 18616429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-008-0213-x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Astley SM, Gilbert FJ (2004) Computer-aided detection in mammography. Clin Radiol 59:390-399
2. Bazzocchi M, Mazzarella F, Del Frate C, Girometti R, Zuiani C (2007) CAD systems for mammography: A real opportunity? A review of the literature. Radiol Med 112:329-353
3. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ (2001) Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220:781-786
4. Cupples TE, Cunningham JE, Reynolds JC (2005) Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. Am J Roentgenol 185:944-950
5. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace L (2004) Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:185-190
6. Taylor PM, Champness J, Given-Wilson RM, Potts HWE, Johnston K (2004) An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms. Br J Radiol 77:21-27
7. Khoo LAL, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM (2005) Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom national breast screening programme: Prospective study. Radiology 237:444-449
8. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, Berns EA, Cutter G, Hendrick RE, Barlow WE, Elmore JG (2007) Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 356:1399-1409
9. Alberdi E, Povyakalo AA, Strigini L, Ayton P (2004) Effects of incorrect CAD output on human decision making in mammography. Acad Radiol 11:909-918
10. Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Lehman CD (2006) Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 187:1475-1482
11. Houssami N, Given-Wilson R (2007) Incorporating new technologies into clinical practice without evidence of effectiveness in prospective studies: Computer-aided detection (CAD) in breast screening reinforces the need for better initial evaluation. Breast 16:219-221
12. Povyakalo AA, Alberdi E, Strigini L, Ayton P (2004) Evaluating 'Human + Advisory computer' system: A case study. In: Dearden A, Watts L (eds) HCI2004, 18th British HCI Group Annual Conf. British HCI Group, Leeds, pp 93-96
13. Strigini L, Povyakalo AA, Alberdi E (2003) Human-machine diversity in the use of computerised advisory systems: A case study. In: 2003 Int. Conf. on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'03). IEEE, San Francisco
14. Alberdi E, Povyakalo AA, Strigini L, Ayton P, Hartswood M, Procter R, Slack R (2005) Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: A multidisciplinary investigation. Br J Radiol 78:S31-S40
15. Skitka LJ, Mosier K, Burdick MD (1999) Does automation bias decision making?. Int J Human-Comput Stud 51:991-1006
16. Hartswood M, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Slack R, Soutter J, Voss A (2003) 'Repairing' the Machine: A Case study of the evaluation of computer-aided detection tools in breast screening. In: Kuutti K Karsten EH, Fitzpatrick G, Dourish P, Schmidt K (ed) Eighth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2003). Helsinki, Finland
17. Parasuraman R, Molloy R, Singh IL (1993) Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency". Int J Aviat Psychol 3:1-23