Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: Comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: An observer performance study

European Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1365-1371

  Kamitani, Takeshi ^a   Yabuuchi, Hidetake ^a   Soeda, Hiroyasu ^a   Matsuo, Yoshio ^a   Okafuji, Takashi ^a   Sakai, Shuji ^b   Furuya, Akio ^c   Hatakenaka, Masamitsu ^a   Ishii, Nobuhide ^d   Honda, Hiroshi ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c FUKUOKA HIGASHI MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^d Fuji Film Medical Co Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast radiography; Diagnostic radiology; Digital; Display; Images; Observer performance; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; COMPUTER TERMINALS; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIQUID CRYSTALS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROBABILITY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 34247893922     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0452-6     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sickles EA (1986) Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentogenol 146:661-663
2. Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F et al (2005) Breast lesion detection and classification: Comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-observer performance study. Radiology 237:37-44
3. Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A (2003) Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I study. Radiology 229:877-884
4. Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program-Oslo II study. Radiology 232:197-204
5. Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, Grabbe EH (2002) Magnification mammography: A comparison of full-field mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications. Eur Radiol 12:2188-2191
6. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ et al (2001) Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218:873-880
7. Ongeval CV, Bosmans H, Steen AV et al (2006) Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: Results of a prospective clinical trial. Eur Radiol 16:1360-1366
8. Fischer U, Hermann KP, Baum F (2006) Digital mammography: Current state and future aspects. Eur Radiol 16:38-44
9. Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Marten K et al (2003) Soft copy versus hard copy reading in digital mammography. J Digit Imaging 16:341-344
10. Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO et al (2002) Interpretation of digital mammograms: Comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 223:483-488
11. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RAD atlas, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
12. Cole E, Pisano ED, Brown M et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer SenoScan digital mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population. Acad Radiol 11:879-886
13. Yamada T, Saito M, Ishibashi T et al (2004) Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography in Japanese population-based screening. Radiat Med 22:408-412
14. Pisano E, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773-1783
15. Scharitzer M, Prokop M, Weber M, Fuchsjager M, Oschatz E, Schaefer-Prokop C (2005) Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: Comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors. Radiology 234:611-616
16. Balassy C, Prokop M, Weber M, Sailer J, Herold CJ, Schaefer-Prokop C (2005) Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: An observer preference study. AJR Am J Roentogenol 184:752-756
17. Oschatz E, Prokop M, Scharitzer M, Weber M, Balassy C, Schaefer-Prokop C (2005) Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions. Eur Radiol 15:1472-1476