Birmingham hip resurfacing: The prevalence of failure

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1344-1350

  Carrothers, A D ^a   Gilbert, R E ^a   Jaiswal, A ^a   Richardson, J B ^a  

^a ROBERT JONES AND AGNES HUNT ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASEPTIC LYMPHOCYTIC VASCULAR AND ASSOCIATED LESION; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING; COXITIS; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP PAIN; HUMAN; LESIONS AND DEFECTS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; GREAT BRITAIN; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957855195     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.23504     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1996;329(Suppl):89-98.
2. Pollard TCB, Basu C, Ainsworth R, Lai W, Bannister GC. Is the Birmingham hip resurfacing worthwhile? Hip 2003;13:25-8.
3. De Smet KA, Pattyn C, Verdonck R. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip 2002;12:158-62. (Pubitemid 35363510)
4. Campbell P, Shimmin A, Walter L, Solomon M. Metal sensitivity as a cause of groin pain in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:1080-5.
5. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Zustin J, et al. Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A(Suppl 3):89-95.
6. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:847-51. (Pubitemid 352009768)
7. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints: a clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:28-36. (Pubitemid 40094136)
8. Jameson SS, Nargol A. Hip resurfacing in women: cause for concern?: clinical results from an independent centre. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:318.
9. Shimmin A, Beaulé PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:637-54.
10. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:735-41.
11. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:463-4.
12. Scheerlinck T, Delport H, Kiewitt T. Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010;92-A:375-87.
13. Lazarinis S, Milbrink J, Hailer NP. Avascular necrosis and subsequent femoral neck fracture 3.5 years after hip resurfacing: a highly unusual late complication in the absence of risk factors: a case report. Acta Orthop 2008;79:763-8.
14. Forrest N, Welch A, Murray AD, et al. Femoral head viability after Birmingham resurfacing hip arthroplasty: assessment with use of [18F] fluoride positron emission tomography. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A(Suppl 3):84-9. (Pubitemid 44706487)
15. Vail TP, Glisson RR, Dominguez DE, Kitaoka K, Ottaviano D. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:1951-60.
16. García-Rey E, García-Cimbrelo E, Cordero-Ampuero J. Outcome of a hemispherical porous-coated acetabular component with a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated anatomical femoral component: a 12- to 15-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:327-32.
17. Beaulé PE, Campbell PA, Hoke R, Dorey F. Notching of the femoral neck during resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a vascular study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:35-9. (Pubitemid 43125310)
18. Zustin J, Krause M, Breer S, et al. Morphologic analysis of periprosthetic fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010;92-A:404-10.
19. Gill HS, Campbell PA, Murray DW, De Smet KA. Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:16-20.
20. Gross TP, Liu F. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component: a seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A(Suppl 3):32-7.
21. Ong KL, Kurtz SM, Manley MT, et al. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:1110-15.
22. Della Valle CJ, Mesko NW, Quigley L, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009;91-A:1130-5.
23. Petersen MB, Poulsen IH, Thomsen J, Solgaard S. The hemispherical Harris-Galante acetabular cup, inserted without cement: the results of an eight to eleven-year follow-up of one hundred and sixty-eight hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1999;81-A:219-24. (Pubitemid 29124082)
24. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:177-84. (Pubitemid 38386853)
25. Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
26. Kim PR, Beaulé PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M. Causes of early failure in a multicentre clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008;23(Suppl 1):44-9.
27. Dotterud LK, Flak ES. Metal allergy in north Norwegian school children and its relationship with ear piercing and atopy. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31:308-13.
28. Fischer T, Rystedt I. Cobalt allergy in hard metal workers. Contact Dermatitis 1983;9:115-21. (Pubitemid 13152427)
29. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Webb J, Nargol AV. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1143-51.
30. McBryde CW, Theivendran K, Thomas AM, Treacy RB, Pynsent PB. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010;92-A:105-12.
31. De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS, et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1291-7.
32. Shimmin AJ, Walter WL, Esposito C. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:469-76.
33. Jeffers JR, Roques A, Taylor A, Tuke MA. The problem with large diameter metal-on-metal acetabular cup inclination. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009;67:189-92.
34. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, et al. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:1566-74.
35. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, et al. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:38-46.
36. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, et al. Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:1072-8.
37. De Haan R, Campbell PA, Su EP, De Smet KA. Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1158-63.
38. De Smet K, Campbell PA, Gill HS. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a consensus from the Advanced Hip Resurfacing Course, Ghent, June 2009. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:335-6.
39. Khan M, Kuiper JH, Edwards D, Robinson E, Richardson JB. Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:1044-50.
40. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-70.
41. Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1137-42.
42. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:436-41. (Pubitemid 351542858)
43. Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: Annual Report 2007. http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se (date last accessed 11 April 2010).
44. Mahomed NN, Barret JA, Katz JN, et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United Stated medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:27-32.
45. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 6th Annual Report 2009. www.njrcentre.org.ukINJRCentre/AbouttheNJR/ Publicationsandreports/Annualreports/tabiol/86/Default.aspx (date last accessed 18 May 2010).
46. No authors listed. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry: Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Annual Report 2008. http://www.aoa.org.au/jointregistry-pub.asp (date last accessed 11 April 2010).
47. Allami MK, Fender D, Khaw FM, et al. Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single health region in England: the results at ten years from a regional arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:1293-8. (Pubitemid 44613142)
48. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40. (Pubitemid 19037656)
49. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
50. Lingard EA, Muthumayandi K, Holland JP. Comparison of patinet-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:1550-4.