The computer science pipeline in urban high schools: Access to what? For Whom?

IEEE Technology and Society Magazine

Volumn 22, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Margolis, Jane ^a   Holme, Jennifer Jellison ^a   Estrella, Rachel ^a   Goode, Joanna ^a   Nao, Kim ^a   Stumme, Simeon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; EDUCATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STUDENTS;

COMPUTER LITERACY; RACES; URBAN HIGH SCHOOLS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 10744226904     PISSN: 02780097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MTAS.2003.1237467     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AB 64 Education Technology. Chaptered 08/19/97. http://www.cde.ca.gov/digitalhigh/AB.htm
2. AB 598 Assembly Bill. Chaptered 02/19/99. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ctl/ab598.htm
3. A. Amsden and J.C. Clark, "Software entrepreneurship among the urban poor: Could Bill Gates have succeeded if he were black?...or improverished?," in High Technology and Low-Income Communities: Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology, D. Schön, B. Sanyal, & W. Mitchell, Eds. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1999.
4. H. Becker, J. Ravitz, and Y. Wong, "Teaching, learning, computing: 1998 national survey," Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, Univ. of California, Irvine and University of Minnesota, 1999.
5. H. Becker, "Who's wired and who's not?," The Future of Children, vol. 10 no. 2, pp. 44-75, 2000.
6. California Department of Education, Digital High School Program Application: FY 199/00 and FY 2000/01. California Department of Education Education Technology Office, 1999.
7. California Department of Education Educational Demographics Unit, http://www.cde.ca.gov/ftpbranch/retdiv/demo/Demohome.html
8. California Department of Education and the California Technology Assistance Project, Summary of Statewide Results from the 2001 California Technology Survey, Sept. 2001.
9. California Department of Education Education Technology Planning: A guide for School Districts, Commission on Technology in Learning: Sacramento, CA, 2001.
10. College Board, Advanced Placement Program California and National Summary Reports, College Entrance Examination Board, 2001.
11. L. Cuban, Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 2001.
12. Digital High School Program Application, California Department of Education, Education Technology Office, 1999.
13. "Tracking tech trends," Education Week, vol. XX1, no. 35, May 2002.
14. R. Eglash, www.rpi.edu/eglash.html.
15. R. Kling and W. Scacchi, "The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization," in Advances in Computers, M.C. Yovits, Ed., vol. 21. New York, NY: Academic, 1982, pp. 1-90.
16. R. Kling, "Behind the terminal: The critical role of computing infrastructure in effective information systems' development and use," in Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development, W. Cotterman and J. Senn, Eds. New York, NY: Wiley, 1992, pp.327-373.
17. V. Lee, R.G. Crogninger, J.B. Smith, "Course-taking, equity, and mathematics learning: Testing the constrained curriculum hypothesis in U.S. secondary schools," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 99-121, 1997.
18. V.E. Lee et al., High school curriculum structure: Effects on coursetaking and achievement in mathematics for high school graduates-An examination of data from the national Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Working Pap. 98, 1998.
19. J. Margolis and A. Fisher, Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 2002.
20. National Research Council, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Being Fluent with Information Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
21. J. Oakes, Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. Yale Univ. Press, 1985.
22. J. Oakes, "Tracking in mathematics and science education: A structural contribution to unequal schooling," in Class, Race, and Gender in American Education, L. Weis, Ed. Albany, NY: State Univ. of New York Press, 1989.
23. J. Oakes, Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp., 1990.
24. J. Oakes, "Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics," Rev. Research in Education, vol. 16, pp. 153-222, 1990.
25. J. Oakes and G. Guiton, "Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions," Amer. Educational Res. J., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3-33, 1994.
26. J. Oakes et al., "Diversity and course-taking: Equity concerns in mathematics and science achievement," prepared for NISE Forum: Diversity and Equity Issues in Mathematics and Science Education: Recommendations for a Research Agenda, Detroit, MI, 2000.
27. M. Resnick, N. Rusk, and S. Cooke, "The computer clubhouse: Technological fluency in the inner city," in High Technology and Low-Income Communities: Prospects for the Positive Use of Advanced Information Technology, D. Schön, B. Sanyal, and W. Mitchell, Eds. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1999.
28. J.W. Schofield and A.L. Davidson, Bringing the Internet to School: Lessons from an Urban District. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
29. E. Soloway, "Should we teach students to program?," Commun. ACM., vol. 36, no. 10, Oct. 1993.
30. Taulbee Report Survey, "2000-2001 CRA Taulbee Survey," 2001; www.cra.org/statistics/home.html
31. Tomas Rivera Policy Papers, Digital Stepping Stones. http://www.trpi.org/dss/index.htm
32. M. Warschauer, "Technology and school reform: A view from both sides of the track," 2000; www.gse.uci.edu/markw/reform.html.
33. M. Warshauer, Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 2003.
34. H. Wenglinsky, "Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics," Policy Information Rep., Educational Testing Service, 1998.