The integration of task-set components into cognitive task representations

Psychologica Belgica

Volumn 50, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 383-411

  Philip, Andrea M ^a,b   Koch, Iring ^a,b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957838609     PISSN: 00332879     EISSN: 2054670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/pb-50-3-4-383     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltá & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. S. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Arrington, C., Altmann, E., & Carr, T. (2003). Tasks of a feather flock together: Similarity effects in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 31, 781-789.
4. Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J.-P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 95, 14529-14534.
5. de Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention & Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 357-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Cue-task associations in task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 762-769.
7. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
8. Hahn, S., Andersen, G. J., & Kramer, A. F. (2003). Multidimensional set switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 503-509.
9. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
10. Hübner, R., Futterer, T., & Steinhauser, M. (2001). On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 640-653.
11. Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Multisensory executive functioning. Brain & Cognition, 55, 325-327.
12. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching - A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-874.
13. Kleinsorge, T. (2004). Hierarchical switching with two types of judgment and two stimulus dimensions. Experimental Psychology, 51, 145-149.
14. Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300-312.
15. Kleinsorge, T., Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (2002). Processes of task-set reconfiguration: Switching operations and implementation operations. Acta Psychologica, 111, 1-28.
16. Kleinsorge, T., Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (2004). Assembling a task space: Global determination of local shift costs. Psychological Research, 68, 31-40.
17. Koch, I. (2005). Sequential task predictability in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 107-112.
18. Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching - A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1-14.
19. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dualtask situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
20. Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Cross-modal selective attention in task switching. Psychological Research, 74, 255-267.
21. Mayr, U., & Bryck, R. L. (2005). Sticky rules: Integration between abstract rules and specific actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 337-350.
22. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
23. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
24. Mcuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25-40.
25. Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., Padilla, F., & Ahn, J.-C. (2004). Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 115, 123-142.
26. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
27. Murray, M. M., De Santis, L., Thut, G., & Wylie, G. R. (2009). The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision. Brain & Cognition, 69, 47-55.
28. Philipp, A. M., Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 395-416.
29. Philipp, A. M., Jolicoeur, P., Falkenstein, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Response selection and response execution in task switching: Evidence from a go-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 1062-1075.
30. Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2005). Switching of response modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1325-1338.
31. Quinlan, P. T., & Hill, N. I. (1999). Sequential effects in rudimentary auditory and visual tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 375-384.
32. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
33. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
34. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.
35. Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92-105.
36. Sohn, M.-H., & Anderson, J. R. (2003). Stimulus-related priming during task switching. Memory & Cognition, 31, 775-780.
37. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
38. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2006). Selective stopping in task switching: The role of response selection and response execution. Experimental Psychology, 53, 48-57.
39. Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Vandierendonck, A., & Demanet, J. (2007). Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: A recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 342-356.
40. Vandierendonck, A., Christiaens, E., & Liefooghe, B. (2008). On the representation of task information in task switching: Evidence from task and dimension switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1248-1261.
41. Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 455-469.