Sequential effects in rudimentary auditory and visual tasks

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 375-384

  Quinlan, Philip T ^a   Hill, Nicholas I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HEARING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0033071919     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206894     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BERNSTEIN, I. H., PEDERSON, N. N., & SCHURMAN, D. L. (1972). Intersensory versus intrasensory contingent information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 156-161.
2. BERTELSON, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90-102.
3. BERTELSON, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 206, 217-218.
4. FLETCHER, B., & RABBITT, P. M. A. (1978). The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection with practice in a two-choice reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 417-427.
5. HANNES, M., SUTTON, S., & ZUBIN, J. (1968). Reaction time: Stimulus uncertainty with response certainty. Journal of General Psychology, 78, 165-181.
6. KRISTOFFERSON, M. W. (1967). Shifting attention between modalities: A comparison of schizophrenics and normals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 388-394.
7. KRUEGER, L. E., & SHAPIRO, R. G. (1981). Intertrial effects of same -different judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 241-265.
8. LABERGE, D. (1973). Identification of two components of the time to switch attention: A test of a serial and a parallel model of attention. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 71-85). New York: Academic Press.
9. PASHLER, H., & BAYLIS, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 33-48.
10. POSNER, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. POSNER, M. I., NISSEN, M. J., & KLEIN, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157-171.
13. RABBITT, P. M. A. (1968). Repetition effects and signal classification strategies in serial choice-response tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 232-240.
14. RABBITT, P. M. A. (1992). Many happy repetitions: A celebration of the "Bertelson Repetition Effect" 1961-1991. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 313-330). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. REUTER-LORENZ, P. A., JHA, A. P., & ROSENQUIST, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 367-378.
16. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
17. SMITH, M. C. (1968). Repetition effect and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 435-439.
18. SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (1997). On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 389-403.
19. SUTTON, S., HAKEREM, G., ZUBIN, J., & PORTNOY, H. (1961). The effect of shift of sensory modality on serial reaction-time: A comparison of schizophrenics and normals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 224-234.
20. SUTTON, S., & ZUBIN, J. (1964). Effect of sequence on reaction time in schizophrenia. In A. T. Welford & J. E. Birren (Eds.), Behavior, ageing and the nervous system (pp. 1-37). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
21. TANAKA, Y., & SHIMOJO, S. (1996). Location vs. feature: Reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions. Vision Research, 36, 2125-2140.
22. TERRY, K. M., VALDES, L. A., & NEILL, W. T. (1994). Does "inhibition of return" occur in discrimination tasks? Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 279-286.
23. UMILTA, C., SNYDER, C., & SNYDER, M. (1972). Repetition effect as a function of event uncertainty, response-stimulus interval and rank order of the event. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 320-326.
24. WINER, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.