Decomposing the Garner interference paradigm: Evidence for dissociations between macrolevel and microlevel performance

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1676-1691

  Dyson, Benjamin J ^a   Quinlan, Philip T ^b  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SOUND DETECTION; UNCERTAINTY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SOUND LOCALIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957672452     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1676     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., Hevenor, S., Graham, S., & Grady, C. L. (2001). "What" and "where" in the human auditory system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 12301-12306.
2. Anourova, I., Nikouline, V. V., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Hotta, J., Aronen, H. J., & Carlson, S. (2001). Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing. NeuroImage, 14, 1268-1277.
3. Arnott, S. R., Binns, M. A., Grady, C. L., & Alain, C. (2004). Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans. NeuroImage, 22, 401-408.
4. Baldeweg, T. (2006). Repetition effects to sounds: Evidence for predictive coding in the auditory system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 93-94.
5. Bamber, D. (1969). Reaction times and error rates for "same"-"different" judgments of multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 169-174.
6. Ben-Artzi, E., & Marks, L. E. (1995). Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus difference. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1151-1162.
7. Ben-Artzi, E., & Marks, L. E. (1999). Processing linguistic and perceptual dimensions of speech: Interactions in speeded classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 579-595.
8. Boenke, L. T., Ohl, F. W., Nikolaev, A. R., Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2009). Different time courses of Stroop and Garner effects in perception-An event-related potentials study. NeuroImage, 45, 1272-1288.
9. Caclin, A., Giard, M. H., Smith, B. K., & McAdams, S. (2007). Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: A Garner interference study. Brain Research, 1138, 159-170.
10. Caclin, A., McAdams, S., Smith, B. K., & Giard, M. H. (2008). Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: An exploration with event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 49-64.
11. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). Psy-Scope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
12. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
13. Dyson, B. J. (in press). Trial after trial: General processing consequences as a function of repetition and change in multi-dimensional sound. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
14. Dyson, B. J., & Alain, C. (2008). Is a change as good with a rest? Task-dependent effects of inter-trial contingency on concurrent sound segregation. Brain Research, 1189, 135-144.
15. Dyson, B. J., Alain, C., & He, Y. (2005). I've heard it all before: Perceptual invariance represented by early cortical auditory-evoked responses. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 457-460.
16. Dyson, B. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (2002). Within-and between-dimensional processing in the auditory modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1483-1498.
17. Dyson, B. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (2003). Feature and conjunction processing in the auditory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 254-272.
18. Dyson, B. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (2004). Stimulus processing constraints in audition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 1117-1131.
19. Entus, A., & Bindra, D. (1970). Common features of the "repetition" and "same-different" effect in reaction time experiments. Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 143-148.
20. Farell, B. (1985). "Same"-"different" judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 419-456.
21. Felfoldy, G. L. (1974). Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 453-459.
22. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
23. Garner, W. R. (1976). Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 98-123.
24. Garner, W. R., & Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225-241.
25. Garrido, M. I., Kilner, J. M., Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2009). The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 453-463.
26. Grau, J. W., & Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1988). The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: Evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 347-370.
27. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14-23.
28. Haenschel, C., Vernon, D. J., Dwivedi, P., Gruzelier, J. H., & Baldeweg, T. (2005). Event-related brain potential correlates of human auditory sensory memory-trace formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10494-10501.
29. Hall, D. A. (2003). Auditory pathways: Are "what" and "where" appropriate? Current Biology, 13, R406-R408.
30. Harris, J. D., Pikler, A. G., Hoffman, H. S., & Ehmer, R. H. (1958). The interaction of pitch and loudness discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 232-238.
31. Hawkins, H. L. (1969). Parallel processing in complex visual discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 56-64.
32. Huettel, S. A., & Lockhead, G. R. (1999). Range effects of an irrelevant dimension on classification. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1624-1645.
33. Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1097-1113.
34. Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1993). Processing integral dimensions: The whole view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1105-1113.
35. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
36. Kruger, L. E., & Shapiro, R. G. (1981). Intertrial effects of same-different judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 241-265.
37. Krumhansl, C. L., & Iverson, P. (1992). Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 739-751.
38. Kubovy, M. (1981). Concurrent-pitch segregation and the theory of indispensable attributes. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 55-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80, 97-126.
40. Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2003). In defense of the theory of indispensable attributes. Cognition, 87, 225-233.
41. Leboe, L. C., & Mondor, T. A. (2007). Item-specific congruency effects in nonverbal auditory Stroop. Psychological Research, 71, 568-575.
42. Lockhead, G. R. (1972). Processing dimensional stimuli: A note. Psychological Review, 79, 410-419.
43. Maddox, W. T. (1992). Perceptual and decisional separability. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 147-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
45. Melara, R. D., & Marks, L. E. (1990). Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 169-178.
46. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory & Cognition, 21, 627-645.
47. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1994). Contextual influences on interactive processing: Effects of discriminability, quantity, and uncertainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 73-90.
48. Mondor, T. A., Hurlburt, J., & Thorne, L. (2003). Categorizing sounds by pitch: Effects of stimulus similarity and response repetition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 107-114.
49. Mondor, T. A., & Leboe, L. C. (2008). Stimulus and response repetition effects in the detection of sounds: Evidence of obligatory retrieval and use of a prior event. Psychological Research, 72, 183-191.
50. Mondor, T. A., Zatorre, R. J., & Terrio, N. A. (1998). Constraints on the selection of auditory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 66-79.
51. Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 520-538.
52. Mordkoff, J. T., Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1990). Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 157-168.
53. Näätänen, R., Porkka, R., Merisalo, A., & Ahtola, S. (1980). Location vs. frequency of pure tones as a basis of fast discrimination. Acta Psychologica, 44, 31-40.
54. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826-859.
55. Neuhoff, J. G. (2003). Pitch variation is unnecessary (and sometimes insufficient) for the formation of auditory objects. Cognition, 87, 219-224.
56. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 33-48.
57. Patching, G. R., & Quinlan, P. T. (2002). Garner and congruency effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 755-775.
58. Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 516-540.
59. Pomerantz, J. R., & Sager, L. C. (1975). Asymmetric integrality with dimensions of visual pattern. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 460-466.
60. Quinlan, P. T. (1999). Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 297-303.
61. Rabbitt, P. (1992). Many happy repetitions: A celebration of the "Bertelson Repetition Effect" 1961-1991. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 313-330). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
62. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113-129.
63. Sabri, M., & Campbell, K. B. (2001). Effects of sequential and temporal probability of deviant occurrence on mismatch negativity. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 171-180.
64. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1997). Fast preattentive processing of location: A functional basis for selective listening in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 232, 5-8.
65. Shechter, S., & Hochstein, S. (1992). Asymmetric interactions in the processing of the visual dimensions of position, width, and contrast of bar stimuli. Perception, 21, 297-312.
66. Smith, E. C., & Lewicki, M. S. (2006). Efficient auditory coding. Nature, 439, 978-982.
67. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
68. van Leeuwen, C., & Bakker, L. (1995). Stroop can occur without Garner interference: Strategic and mandatory influences in multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 379-393.
69. van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
70. Watanabe, T. (1988). Effect of irrelevant differences as a function of the relations between relevant and irrelevant dimensions in the same-different task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 132-142.
71. Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
72. Wood, C. C. (1975). Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speech perception: Neurophysiological and information-processing analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1, 3-20.
73. Woods, D. L., Alain, C., Diaz, R., Rhodes, D., & Ogawa, K. H. (2001). Location and frequency cues in auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 65-74.
74. Woods, D. L., Alain, C., & Ogawa, K. H. (1998). Conjoining auditory and visual features during high-rate serial presentation: Processing and conjoining two features can be faster than processing one. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 239-249.
75. Wühr, P., Biebl, R., & Ansorge, U. (2008). The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 533-545.
76. Zmigrod, S., & Hommel, B. (2009). Auditory event files: Integrating auditory perception and action planning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 352-362.