Processing linguistic and perceptual dimensions of speech: Interactions in speeded classification

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 579-595

  Ben Artzi, Elisheva ^a,b   Marks, Lawrence E ^a  

^a JOHN B PIERCE LABORATORY   (United States)

^b BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033143456     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.579     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ben-Artzi, E., & Marks, L. E. (1995). Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus difference. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1151-1162.
2. Dunbar, K. N., & MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622-639.
3. Dyer, F. N. (1973a). Interference and facilitation for color naming with separate bilateral presentations of the word and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 314-317.
4. Dyer, F. N. (1973b). Same and different judgments for word-color paire with "irrelevant" words or colors: Evidence for word-code comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 102-108.
5. Dyer, F. N. (1974). Stroop interference with long preexposure of the word: Comparison of pure and mixed preexposure sequences. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 8-10.
6. Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Gamer, W. R., & Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225-241.
8. Glaser, M. O., & Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875-894.
9. Glaser, W. R., & Dungelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.
10. Gottwald, R. L., & Garner, W. R. (1972). Effects of focusing strategy on speeded classification with grouping, filtering, and condensation tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 179-182.
11. Grau, J. W., & Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1988). The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: Evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 347-370.
12. Green, E. J., & Barber, P. J. (1981). An auditory Stroop effect with judgments of speaker gender. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 459-466.
13. Hamers, J. F., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Bilingual interdependencies in auditory perception. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 303-310.
14. Handel, S., & Imai, S. (1972). The free classification of analyzable and unanalyzable stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 108-116.
15. Hatta, T., & Kirshner, K. (1983). Language processing in partial English-Japanese bilinguals: Evidence from Stroop-test results. International Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 241-248.
16. Haussmann, R. E. (1992). Tachistoscopic presentation and millisecond timing on the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2: A Turbo Pascal unit to provide general-purpose routines for CGA, Hercules, EGA, and VGA monitors. Behavior, Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 24, 303-310.
17. Hershenson, M. (1962). Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 289-293.
18. Jerger, S., Pirozzolo, F., Jerger, J., Elizondo, R., Desai, S., Wright, E., & Reynosa, R. (1993). Developmental trends in the interaction between auditory and linguistic processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 310-320.
19. Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1989). The nature of occurrence of holistic processing. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 203-233). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Lewkowicz, D., & Turkewitz, G. (1980). Cross-modal equivalence in early infancy: Auditory-visual intensity matching. Developmental Psychology, 16, 597-607.
21. Lockhead, G. R. (1972). Processing dimensional stimuli: A note. Psychological Review, 79, 410-419.
22. Lockhead, G. R. (1979). Holistic versus analytic process models: A reply. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 746-755.
23. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
24. Marks, L. E. (1987). On cross-modal similarity: Auditory-visual interactions in speeded discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 384-394.
25. McClain, L. (1983a). Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 735-743.
26. McClain, L. (1983b). Stimulus-response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 266-270.
27. Melara, R. D. (1989). Dimensional interaction between color and pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 69-79.
28. Melara R. D., & Marks, L. E. (1990a). Dimensional interactions in language processing: Investigating directions and levels of crosstalk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 539-554.
29. Melara, R. D., & Marks, L. E. (1990b). Interacts among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 169-178.
30. Melara, R. D., & Marks, L. E. (1990C). Processes underlying dimensional interactions: Correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions. Memory & Cognition, 18, 477-495.
31. Melara, R. D., Marks, L. E., & Potts, B. C. (1993). Early-holistic processing or dimensional similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1114-1120.
32. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1994). Contextual influences on interactive processing: Effects of discriminability quantity, and uncertainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 73-90.
33. Melara, R. D., & O'Brien, T. P. (1987). Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 323-336.
34. Mullennix, J. W., & Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 379-390.
35. Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Martin, C. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365-378.
36. Mulligan, R. M., & Shaw, M. L. (1981). Attending to simple auditory and visual signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 447-454.
37. Nealis, P. M. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon: Some critical tests of the response competition hypothesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 147-153.
38. Pomerantz, J. R. (1986). Visual form perception: An overview. In E. C. Schwab & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), Pattern recognition by humans and machines: Visual perception (pp. 1-30). New York: Academic Press.
39. Pomerantz, J. R., Pristach, E. A., & Carson, C. E. (1989). Attention and object perception. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 53-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Ratcliff, R., & Hacker, M. J. (1981). Speed and accuracy of same and different responses in perceptual matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 303-307.
41. Redding, G. M., & Gerjets, D. A. (1977). Stroop effect: Interference and facilitation with verbal and manual responses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 11-17.
42. Roffler, S. K., & Butler, R. A. (1968). Localization of tonal stimuli to the vertical plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 1260-1266.
43. Schulz, T. (1979). Components of the reaction time Stroop-task. Psychological Research, 40, 377-395.
44. Shepp, B. E. (1989). On perceiving objects: Holistic versus featural properties. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 203-233). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Shor, R. E. (1975). An auditory analog of the Stroop test. Journal of General Psychology, 93, 281-288.
46. Sichel, J. L., & Chandler, K. A. (1969). The color-word interference test: The effects of varied color-word combinations upon verbal response latency. Journal of Psychology, 72, 219-231.
47. Simon, J. R. & Acosta, E. (1982). Effect of irrelevant information on the processing of relevant information: Facilitation and/or interference? The influence of experimental design. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 383-388.
48. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
49. van Leeuwen, C., & Bakker, L. (1995). Stroop can occur without Garner interference: Strategic and mandatory influences in multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 379-392.
50. Virzi, R. A., & Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translation model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13, 304-319.
51. Walker, P., & Smith, S. (1984). Stroop interference based on the synaesthetic qualities of auditory pitch. Perception, 13, 75-81.
52. Wood, C. C. (1974). Parallel processing of auditory and phonetic information in speech discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 510-508.