Item-specific congruency effects in nonverbal auditory Stroop

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 568-575

  Leboe, Launa C ^a   Mondor, Todd A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HEARING; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REACTION TIME;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 34547782317     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0049-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adam, J. J., Boon, B., Paas, F. G. W. C., & Umiltà, C. (1998). The up-right/down-left advantage for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: A dual-strategy hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1582-1595
2. Adobe Systems Incorporated (2005). Adobe Audition 1.5. San Jose, CA
3. Bauer, D. W., & Miller, J. (1982). Stimulus-response compatibility and the motor system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 367-380
4. Besner, D., & Stolz, J. A. (1999). Unconsciously controlled processing: The Stroop effect reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 449-455
5. Broadbent, D. E. (1954). The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 191-196
6. Cherry, C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979
7. Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2004). Stimulu-set location does not affect orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 69, 106-114
8. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing model of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361
9. Danziger, S., Estevez, A. F., & Mari-Beffa, P. (2002). Stroop interference effects in partially colored Stroop words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 536-541
10. Green, E. J., & Barber, P. J. (1981). An auditory Stroop effect with judgments of speaker gender. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 459-466
11. Green, E. J., & Barber, P. J. (1983). Interference effects in an auditory Stroop task: Congruence and correspondence. Acta Psychologica, 53, 183-194
12. Hall, M. D., & Blasko, D. G. (2005). Attentional interference in judgments of musical timbre: Individual differences in working memory. The Journal of General Psychology, 132, 94-112
13. Hamers, J. F., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Bilingual interdependencies in auditory perception. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 303-310
14. Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 47-91). New York: Academic
15. Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 649-667
16. Jacoby, L. L., & Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception and concept formation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 18, 1-47
17. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(3), 638-644
18. Kahneman, D., & Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual Organization (pp. 181-211). Hillsdale: Erlbaum
19. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270
20. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323
21. Lindsay, D. S., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 219-234
22. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527
23. Logan, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376-400
24. Logan, G. D., Zbrodoff, N. J., & Williamson, J. (1984). Strategies in the color-word Stroop task. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 22, 135-138
25. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203
26. MacLeod, C. M. (1998). Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation. Memory & Cognition, 26, 201-211
27. MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 383-391
28. MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 304-315
29. Martino, G., & Marks, L. E. (1999). Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: Tests of semantic coding hypothesis. Perception, 28, 903-923
30. Martino, G., & Marks, L. E. (2001). Synethesia: strong and weak. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 61-65
31. McClain, L. (1983). Stimulus-response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 266-270
32. Mondor, T. A., Zatorre, R. J., & Terrio, N. A. (1998). Constraints on the selection of auditory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 66-79
33. Morgan, A. L. R., & Brandt, J. F. (1989). An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time. Brain and Language, 36, 592-603
34. Neely, J. H., & Kahan, T. A. (2001). Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: essays in honour of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 69-93). Washington: American Psychological Association
35. Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (1999). E-Prime Software System. Pittsburg, PA
36. Roe, W. T., Wilsoncroft, W. E., & Griffiths, R. S. (1980). Effects of motor and verbal practice on the Stroop task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 647-650
37. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representations of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition (in press)
38. Schmit, V., & Davis, R. (1974). The role of hemispheric specialization in the analysis of Stroop stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 38, 149-158
39. Simon, J. R., Mewaldt, S. P., Acosta, E., Jr., & Hu, J. (1976). Processing auditory information: Interaction of two population stereotypes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 354-358
40. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662
41. Virzi, R. A., & Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory and Cognition, 13, 304-319
42. Warren, L. R., & Marsh, G. R. (1979). Changes in event related potentials during processing of Stroop stimuli. International Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 217-223
43. Weeks, D. J., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus-response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355-366
44. Zhang, H., & Kornblum, S. (1998). The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 3-19