Trial after trial: General processing consequences as a function of repetition and change in multidimensional sound

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1770-1788

  Dyson, Benjamin J ^a  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Audition; Repetition effects; Selective attention; What where

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SOUND DETECTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; SOUND LOCALIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956699422     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210903514255     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anourova, I., Nikouline, V. V., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Hotta, J., Aronen, H. J., & Carlson, S. (2001). Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing. NeuroImage, 14, 1268-1277.
2. Bamber, D. (1969). Reaction times and error rates for "same"-"different" judgments of multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 169-174.
3. Bregman, A. S., & Steiger, H. (1980). Auditory streaming and vertical localization: Interdepedence of "what" and "where" decisions in audition. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 539-546.
4. Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
5. Duncan, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Martin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 85-160). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Dyson, B. J. (2010). Perceptual organisation. In C. Plack Auditory perception. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Dyson, B. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (2004). Stimulus processing constraints in audition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1117-1131.
8. Egeth, H. E. (1966). Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 245-252.
9. Farell, B. (1985). "Same"-"different" judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 419-456.
10. Found, A., & Muller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension-weighting" account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
11. Hawkins, H. L. (1969). Parallel processing in complex visual discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 56-64.
12. Hawkins, H. L, MacKay, S. L., Holley, S. L., Friedin, B. D., & Cohen, S. L. (1973). Locus of the relative frequency effect in choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 90-99.
13. Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 800-817.
14. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
15. Huang, L., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 12-20.
16. Huettel, S. A., & Lockhead, G. R. (1999). Range effects of an irrelevant dimension on classification. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1624-1645.
17. Jolicœur, P. (1999). Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the processing blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1097-1113.
18. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. New York: Prentice-Hall.
19. Krueger, L. E. (1970). Effect of stimulus probability on two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 377-379.
20. Kruger, L. E., & Shapiro, R. G. (1981). Intertrial effects of same-different judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 241-265.
21. Kubovy, M. (1981). Concurrent-pitch segregation and the theory of indispensable attributes. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 55-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80, 97-126.
23. LaBerge, D., & Tweedy, J. R. (1964). Presentation probability and choice time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 477-481.
24. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
25. Lavie, N. (2005). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75-82.
26. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133,339-354.
27. Leboe, L. C., & Mondor, T. A. (2007). Item-specific congruency effects in nonverbal auditory Stroop. Psychological Research, 71, 568-575.
28. Leuthold, H., & Sommer, W. (1993). Stimulus presentations dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction times. Psychophysiology, 30, 510-517.
29. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of popout: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22,657-672.
30. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of popout: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 977-991.
31. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
32. Melara, R. D., & Marks, L. E. (1990). Dimensional interactions in language processing: Investigating directions and levels of crosstalk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 539-554.
33. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory and Cognition, 21, 627-645.
34. Mondor, T. A., Hurlburt, J., & Thorne, L. (2003). Categorizing sounds by pitch: Effects of stimulus similarity and response repetition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 107-114.
35. Mondor, T. A., & Leboe, L. C. (2008). Stimulus and responses repetition effects in the detection of sounds: Evidence of obligatory retrieval and use of a prior event. Psychological Research, 72, 183-191.
36. Mondor, T. A., Zatorre, R. J., & Terrio, N. A. (1998). Constraints on the selection of auditory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 66-79.
37. Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 520-538.
38. Mordkoff, J. T., Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1990). Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 157-168.
39. Mudd, S. A. (1963). Spatial stereotypes of four dimensions of pure tone. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66,347-352.
40. Muller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
41. Muller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1021-1035.
42. Näätänen, R., Porkka, R., Merisalo, A., & Ahtola, S. (1980). Location vs. frequency of pure tones as a basis of fast discrimination. Acta Psychologica, 44, 31-40.
43. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 650-657.
44. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 33-48.
45. Patching, G. R., & Quinlan, P. T. (2002). Garner and congruency effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 755-775.
46. Picton, T. W., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W., & Achim, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiology and NeuroOtology, 5, 111-139.
47. Pollmann, S., Weidner, R., Muller, H. J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). A fronto-posterior network involved in visual dimension changes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 480-494.
48. Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 515-540.
49. Quinlan, P. T. (1999). Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 297-303.
50. Rabbitt, P. (1992). Many happy repetitions: A celebration of the "Bertelson Repetition Effect" 1961-1991. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 313-330). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
51. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umilta, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height. Cognition, 99, 113-129.
52. Sabri, M., & Campbell, K. M. (2001). Effects of sequential and temporal probability of deviant occurrence on mismatch negativity. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 171-180.
53. Schröger, E. (1995). Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions. Psychophysiology, 32, 55-65.
54. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1997). Fast preattentive processing of location: A functional basis for selective listening in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 232, 5-8.
55. Spence, C. J., & Driver, J. (1994). Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 555-574
56. van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
57. Visscher, K.M., Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2009). Trial-to-trial carry-over of itemand relationalinformation in auditory short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 46-56.
58. Walker, B. N., & Ehrenstein, A. (2000). Pitch and pitch change interact in auditory displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 15-30.
59. Wanatabe, T. (1988). Effect of irrelevant differences as a function of the relations between relevant and irrelevant dimensions in the same-different task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 132-142.
60. Ward, T. B. (1983). Response tempo and separableintegral responding: Evidence for an integral-toseparable processing sequence in visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 103-112.
61. Woods, D. L., Alain, C., Diaz, R., Rhodes, D., & Ogawa, K. H. (2001). Location and frequency cues in auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 65-74.
62. Zmigrod, S., & Hommel, B. (2009). Auditory event files: Integrating auditory perception and action planning. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71, 352-362.